#meeting-3:fedoraproject.org log

<@phsmoura:fedora.im>

17:00:10

!startmeeting Infrastructure (2025-02-13)

<@meetbot:fedora.im>

17:00:11

Meeting started at 2025-02-13 17:00:10 UTC

<@meetbot:fedora.im>

17:00:11

The Meeting name is 'Infrastructure (2025-02-13)'

<@phsmoura:fedora.im>

17:00:15

!topic ahoy

<@phsmoura:fedora.im>

17:00:15

!info Agenda is at: https://board.net/p/fedora-infra

<@phsmoura:fedora.im>

17:00:15

!chair nirik zlopez nb bodanel dtometzki jnsamyak lenkaseg patrikp

<@phsmoura:fedora.im>

17:00:15

!meetingname infrastructure

<@phsmoura:fedora.im>

17:00:15

!info About our team: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/cle/

<@phsmoura:fedora.im>

17:00:15

!info Fedora Infra documentation: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/infra

<@meetbot:fedora.im>

17:00:16

The Meeting Name is now infrastructure

<@smilner:fedora.im>

17:00:27

!hi

<@zodbot:fedora.im>

17:00:28

None (smilner)

<@phsmoura:fedora.im>

17:00:36

hello\

<@james:fedora.im>

17:01:05

!hi

<@zodbot:fedora.im>

17:01:06

James Antill (james)

<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>

17:01:49

morning

<@Zlopez:matrix.org>

17:01:57

!hi

<@zodbot:fedora.im>

17:01:59

Michal Konecny (zlopez)

<@seddik:fedora.im>

17:02:07

!hi

<@zodbot:fedora.im>

17:02:08

seddik alaouiismaili (seddik)

<@pcreech:matrix.org>

17:02:45

!hi

<@zodbot:fedora.im>

17:02:47

Patrick Creech (pcreech17)

<@phsmoura:fedora.im>

17:04:06

!info Getting Started Guide: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/infra/gettingstarted/

<@phsmoura:fedora.im>

17:04:06

!topic New folks introductions

<@phsmoura:fedora.im>

17:04:06

!info This is a place where people who are interested in Fedora Infrastructure can introduce themselves

<@smilner:fedora.im>

17:04:09

Good crowd today!

<@phsmoura:fedora.im>

17:04:28

are there new people here? feel free to introduce yourselves

<@phsmoura:fedora.im>

17:05:42

!info chair 2025-03-06 - ???

<@phsmoura:fedora.im>

17:05:42

!topic Next chair

<@phsmoura:fedora.im>

17:05:42

!info magic eight ball says:

<@phsmoura:fedora.im>

17:05:42

!info chair 2025-02-20 - @Yaash

<@phsmoura:fedora.im>

17:05:42

!info chair 2025-02-27 - @saibug

<@phsmoura:fedora.im>

17:05:42

!info chair 2025-03-13 - ???

<@phsmoura:fedora.im>

17:06:32

anyone willing to chair this meeting on march 03 or 13?

<@seddik:fedora.im>

17:07:49

13 i can take

<@phsmoura:fedora.im>

17:07:56

<@phsmoura:fedora.im>

17:08:35

thanks saibug , I added you in the board

<@phsmoura:fedora.im>

17:08:55

moving on

<@phsmoura:fedora.im>

17:08:58

!info github2fedmsg sunset date was changed to 13rd February! fedmsg will go away with it!

<@phsmoura:fedora.im>

17:08:58

!info CLE Infra&Releng NA-hours team has a Monday through Thursday 30 minute meeting going through tickets at 1800 UTC in https://matrix.to/#/#meeting-3:fedoraproject.org

<@phsmoura:fedora.im>

17:08:58

!info CLE Infra&Releng EU-hours team has a Monday through Thursday 30 minute meeting going through tickets at 0800 UTC in https://matrix.to/#/#meeting-3:fedoraproject.org

<@phsmoura:fedora.im>

17:08:58

!topic announcements and information

<@phsmoura:fedora.im>

17:09:31

do we have any other announcements?

<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>

17:10:16

!info F42 beta freeze starts next tuesday (the 18th)

<@phsmoura:fedora.im>

17:13:17

!info zlopez is on call from 2025-02-06 to 2025-02-13

<@phsmoura:fedora.im>

17:13:17

!info @pcreech is on call from 2025-02-13 to 2025-02-20

<@phsmoura:fedora.im>

17:13:17

!topic Oncall

<@phsmoura:fedora.im>

17:13:17

!info https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/infra/day_to_day_fedora/#_the_oncall_role_in_our_team

<@phsmoura:fedora.im>

17:13:17

!info @saibug is on call from 2025-02-20 to 2025-02-27

<@phsmoura:fedora.im>

17:13:17

!info ??? is on call from 2025-02-27 to 2025-03-06

<@phsmoura:fedora.im>

17:13:17

!info ??? is on call from 2025-03-06 to 2025-03-13

<@phsmoura:fedora.im>

17:13:58

anyone willing to be oncall on one of those weeks?

<@phsmoura:fedora.im>

17:15:19

we are good for now tho.. lets move on

<@phsmoura:fedora.im>

17:15:29

!info Summary of last week: ( Zlopez )

<@phsmoura:fedora.im>

17:17:16

Zlopez: anything new about oncall in last week?

<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>

17:18:22

There was one oncall I saw in releng room about package lists.

<@phsmoura:fedora.im>

17:19:31

ok, maybe we lost him.. np. Lets see monitoring topic

<@phsmoura:fedora.im>

17:19:49

!info Go over existing items and fix them

<@phsmoura:fedora.im>

17:19:49

!info https://nagios.fedoraproject.org/nagios

<@phsmoura:fedora.im>

17:19:49

!topic Monitoring discussion [nirik]

<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>

17:20:01

ok, lets see...

<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>

17:20:27

there's one alert from ipa01.stg... otherwise we are 100% clear. ;)

<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>

17:20:29

however...

<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>

17:20:52

The fedmsg retirement this morning also nuked some checks we want to keep... so we need to re-add them. ;)

<@Zlopez:matrix.org>

17:21:00

Sorry, my attention was elsewhere

<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>

17:21:57

There were a bunch of checks that looked for messaging messages in datagrepper and alerted if the last one was N time ago. Those were (for whatever reason) run on busgateway01. We should just re-add them to run on noc01 or somewhere.

<@Zlopez:matrix.org>

17:23:04

I had 3 pings during the week, one about failing package build, but that was still something in implementation. One about id.fedoraproject.org not working and that was caused by python update by dnf-automatic and one more, I can't remember what that was about

<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>

17:25:15

I can file a ticket on that and hopefully someone would like to work on it. ;)

<@phsmoura:fedora.im>

17:26:10

ok, lets check the backlog

<@phsmoura:fedora.im>

17:26:40

!link https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issues?status=Open&tags=blocked&priority=0&close_status=

<@phsmoura:fedora.im>

17:26:40

!topic Revisit blocked tickets

<@phsmoura:fedora.im>

17:26:40

!info Check if any blocked ticket is unblocked

<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>

17:27:11

still blocked I think

<@phsmoura:fedora.im>

17:28:28

!info Refine oldest tickets on Fedora Infra tracker

<@phsmoura:fedora.im>

17:28:28

!topic Fedora Infra backlog refinement

<@phsmoura:fedora.im>

17:28:28

!link https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issues?status=Open&order_key=last_updated&order=asc

<@Zlopez:matrix.org>

17:30:03

!ticket 11807

<@zodbot:fedora.im>

17:30:06

<@zodbot:fedora.im>

17:30:06

● **Last Updated:** 5 months ago

<@zodbot:fedora.im>

17:30:06

● **Opened:** 12 months ago by kevin

<@zodbot:fedora.im>

17:30:06

**fedora-infrastructure #11807** (https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/11807):**move resultsdb-ci-listener deployment pipeline**

<@zodbot:fedora.im>

17:30:06

● **Assignee:** patrikp

<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>

17:30:46

No idea the status here. i guess patrikp was looking into it?

<@Zlopez:matrix.org>

17:31:00

I didn't saw any work on this being done

<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>

17:31:04

perhaps we could pair up another person so they could co-work it?

<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>

17:31:21

I'm happy to point to where things are, answer questions...

<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>

17:31:49

perhaps Gwmngilfen would like to help out here?

<@Zlopez:matrix.org>

17:31:55

Me too, that should be relatively easy to do

<@Zlopez:matrix.org>

17:32:12

Happy to point where things are :-)

<@gwmngilfen:fedora.im>

17:33:20

i need to go cook for the family, but I can note 11807 and take a read of it tomorrow

<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>

17:34:30

no hurry, this has been around for a year.

<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>

17:34:44

but it would be very nice to have it fixed before it breaks next time. ;)

<@Zlopez:matrix.org>

17:34:46

!ticket 11377

<@zodbot:fedora.im>

17:35:01

**fedora-infrastructure #11377** (https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/11377):**Install AWX for testing proof of concept**

<@zodbot:fedora.im>

17:35:01

<@zodbot:fedora.im>

17:35:01

● **Opened:** a year ago by kevin

<@zodbot:fedora.im>

17:35:01

● **Last Updated:** 4 months ago

<@zodbot:fedora.im>

17:35:01

● **Assignee:** Not Assigned

<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>

17:35:35

so, I've had some thoughts/discussions on this recently.

<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>

17:35:51

I think we should mark it blocked for now, and then reevaluate after the datacenter move

<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>

17:36:28

it's all tied up with redoing our ansible repo/setup, if awx is done with their big reworkings, and having time to change a lot of things.

<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>

17:36:44

I don't think it's a good idea to try and do this before the DC move.

<@Zlopez:matrix.org>

17:37:25

OK, let me mark it as blocked

<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>

17:37:27

anyone have other thoughts around this?

<@smilner:fedora.im>

17:39:07

In terms of capacity that sounds reasonable. Ideally we could use the same playbooks to set up and remove issues/cruft/etc... before the DC move .... but that may be a bigger lift than we have capacity for at this time.

<@smilner:fedora.im>

17:39:42

I would love to see us have more testing of our ansible stuff as well as more people involved but that's something we can look at in the future

<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>

17:40:02

we really don't have time to re-write everything before the move...and during the move it would make the move a lot harder

<@smilner:fedora.im>

17:41:15

Totally understand. Ideal != reality.

<@Zlopez:matrix.org>

17:41:54

!ticket 12217

<@zodbot:fedora.im>

17:41:56

<@zodbot:fedora.im>

17:41:56

● **Opened:** 4 months ago by dkirwan

<@zodbot:fedora.im>

17:41:56

**fedora-infrastructure #12217** (https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/12217):**Create a POC integration in Konflux for fedora-infra/webhook-to-fedora-messaging**

<@zodbot:fedora.im>

17:41:56

● **Last Updated:** 4 months ago

<@zodbot:fedora.im>

17:41:56

● **Assignee:** dkirwan

<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>

17:42:18

just FYI, our ansible repo: Total Physical Source Lines of Code (SLOC) = 21,004

<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>

17:42:54

so, not sure the status here.

<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>

17:43:16

I also wonder if our forgejo stuff is a better proof of concept and is already pretty far along?

<@Zlopez:matrix.org>

17:44:31

From what I remember @humaton:fedora.im wanted to use amqp directly for forgejo if that would be possible instead of adding another service in the middle

<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>

17:45:07

yeah, I am not sure... re-reading it I might be confused what this was about?

<@Zlopez:matrix.org>

17:45:51

It was about webhook2fedmsg integration

<@Zlopez:matrix.org>

17:46:11

I think we now have more apps that are using that when fedmsg is gone

<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>

17:46:22

ok, so this was just enabling that for konsflux?

<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>

17:46:29

ok, so this was just enabling that for konflux?

<@Zlopez:matrix.org>

17:46:32

Maybe we should just point people to the apps that already did it

<@Zlopez:matrix.org>

17:46:39

Yes

<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>

17:47:17

I read this as "test making webhook2fedmsg images in konflux so we could learn how it works'

<@Zlopez:matrix.org>

17:47:30

From how old the ticket is, I assume it's before we officially announced the migration

<@Zlopez:matrix.org>

17:48:20

I'm not sure, I thought that this is about Konflux using webhook2fedmsg

<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>

17:48:47

so, ask in ticket to clarify? or ask david in early standup?

<@Zlopez:matrix.org>

17:48:50

It would be probably better to ask in the ticket

<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>

17:48:52

or both

<@Zlopez:matrix.org>

17:48:58

Or both

<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>

17:49:09

I can ask in ticket? or would you like to?

<@Zlopez:matrix.org>

17:50:26

I will give you the honors :-)

<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>

17:51:12

ok, asked the thing that was confusing to me. Feel free to add to it. ;)

<@Zlopez:matrix.org>

17:52:36

I think we can move to Open floor now

<@humaton:fedora.im>

17:52:37

I think this was about the app image

<@phsmoura:fedora.im>

17:52:44

!topic Open Floor

<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>

17:53:28

if so, perhaps we just close that for now and use forgejo for image proof of concepting?

<@Zlopez:matrix.org>

17:54:07

Let's wait for response from @dkirwan:fedora.im

<@humaton:fedora.im>

17:54:44

yup if its about the PoC close it and reference forgejo deployment ticket

<@humaton:fedora.im>

17:55:01

we have 1 done by me, and Lenka also created one

<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>

17:55:03

fair enough

<@humaton:fedora.im>

17:55:13

so we have 'some' konflux exposure

<@phsmoura:fedora.im>

17:58:37

seems we dont have anything else

<@phsmoura:fedora.im>

17:58:46

lets go back then

<@phsmoura:fedora.im>

17:59:31

thanks everyone for joinning today

<@phsmoura:fedora.im>

17:59:46

!endmeeting