<@abompard:matrix.org>
19:00:38
!startmeeting Fedora Infrastructure Ops Daily Standup Meeting
<@meetbot:fedora.im>
19:00:39
Meeting started at 2026-07-20 19:00:38 UTC
<@meetbot:fedora.im>
19:00:39
The Meeting name is 'Fedora Infrastructure Ops Daily Standup Meeting'
<@abompard:matrix.org>
19:00:39
!info invitees @smilner:fedora.im
<@abompard:matrix.org>
19:00:39
<@abompard:matrix.org>
19:00:39
!meetingname fedora_infrastructure_ops_daily_standup_meeting
<@abompard:matrix.org>
19:00:39
<@abompard:matrix.org>
19:00:39
!info Meeting is 30 minutes MAX. At the end of 30, its stops
<@abompard:matrix.org>
19:00:39
<@abompard:matrix.org>
19:00:39
!info Agenda is at https://board.net/p/fedora-infra-daily
<@abompard:matrix.org>
19:00:39
!info Reminder: Speak up if you want to work on a ticket!
<@abompard:matrix.org>
19:00:39
!chair @nirik:matrix.scrye.com, @phsmoura:fedora.im, @james:fedora.im
<@abompard:matrix.org>
19:00:39
<@abompard:matrix.org>
19:00:39
<@meetbot:fedora.im>
19:00:41
The Meeting Name is now fedora_infrastructure_ops_daily_standup_meeting
<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>
19:00:46
morning
<@smoliicek:fedora.im>
19:00:53
hello
<@smoliicek:fedora.im>
19:01:18
some forge issues happening in #admin:fedoraproject.org
<@smoliicek:fedora.im>
19:01:21
FYI
<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>
19:01:55
yeah, I saw, but... only one complaint so far...
<@smoliicek:fedora.im>
19:02:06
i'd blame windows :)
<@smoliicek:fedora.im>
19:02:09
is James around?
<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>
19:03:41
perhaps not?
<@smoliicek:fedora.im>
19:03:54
doesn't seem like it, let's continue then
<@smoliicek:fedora.im>
19:03:55
!next
<@abompard:matrix.org>
19:03:57
<@abompard:matrix.org>
19:03:57
!topic Tickets needing review
<@abompard:matrix.org>
19:03:57
<@abompard:matrix.org>
19:03:57
!info https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues?q=&type=all&sort=relevance&state=open&labels=0&milestone=0&project=0&assignee=0&poster=0
<@abompard:matrix.org>
19:03:57
Run `!ticket #<number>` for each ticket, discuss and classify. DON'T DO THIS FOR PRIVATE TICKETS.
<@smoliicek:fedora.im>
19:04:03
ha, no tickets
<@smoliicek:fedora.im>
19:04:05
!next
<@abompard:matrix.org>
19:04:07
!topic Planning, Upcoming work and Open floor
<@smoliicek:fedora.im>
19:04:48
i filed a PR to fasjson that fixes the build problems (switch fedora:40 -> 44)
<@james:fedora.im>
19:04:53
gah, sorry missed
<@smoliicek:fedora.im>
19:04:55
https://github.com/fedora-infra/fasjson/pull/1028
<@smoliicek:fedora.im>
19:05:05
no worries, no tickets :)
<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>
19:05:14
yeah, looks fine, but we should wait until ipa is happy to roll it out
<@smoliicek:fedora.im>
19:05:23
yeah, that's fine
<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>
19:05:47
I hope to work on batcave02 today... there's a bunch of missing ansible-collections packages I need to sort out... then see what else breaks in the playbook after that.
<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>
19:06:02
If I can get it sorted, I'll schedule a switchover day/time
<@smoliicek:fedora.im>
19:07:00
i did (with the help of kevin) the openshift-ro role fix today
<@smoliicek:fedora.im>
19:07:16
will probably go and play around with a grafana POC for fdwg later today
<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>
19:09:07
James: you able to start on that siguldry stuff this week? if not, I can shift to it later in the week. I would really like to try and get it landed...
<@james:fedora.im>
19:09:29
Yeh, I'm looking to do a bunch of that this week.
<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>
19:10:03
excellent. do let me know if I can help any...
<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>
19:11:46
I don't think I have anything else off hand...
<@smoliicek:fedora.im>
19:12:02
also nothing here
<@james:fedora.im>
19:12:13
I did wonder ... what would you prefer ... using conditionals or different dirs/files for sigul vs. siguldry?
<@james:fedora.im>
19:12:26
Dito. the old brdige vs. new bridge.
<@james:fedora.im>
19:12:37
Dito. the old bridge vs. new bridge.
<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>
19:12:41
I would make it a different role entirely. We already do have the pesign-bridge, just put server/bridge under there?
<@james:fedora.im>
19:12:59
Sure, makes sense.
<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>
19:13:15
and you can repave the staging vm's entirely with rhel10 and new data...
<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>
19:13:29
I don't think I ever repopulated them when we moved datacenters anyhow
<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>
19:13:52
we will need to make a new staging test key, but... thats fine.
<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>
19:15:00
oh, I guess we will also need a autosign for stg... just make it a rhel10 vm...
<@james:fedora.im>
19:15:08
Yeh, there's no sign bridges at all that ansible knows about in stg.
<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>
19:15:50
yeah, I guess I indeed never redeployed in stg...
<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>
19:16:06
clean slate! :)
<@smoliicek:fedora.im>
19:20:51
well, i think that's everything?
<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>
19:21:09
yeah, off to reboot into post mass rebuild packages... wish me luck. ;)
<@niknikovsky:fedora.im>
19:21:19
glhf
<@smoliicek:fedora.im>
19:21:21
🫰
<@smoliicek:fedora.im>
19:21:50
James you got the emoji i was looking for :D
<@smoliicek:fedora.im>
19:21:52
well
<@smoliicek:fedora.im>
19:21:55
!endmeeting