#meeting:fedoraproject.org: Fedora Linux Final Go/No-Go Meeting
Meeting started by @amoloney:fedora.im at 17:01:08 UTC
Meeting summary
- INFO: the purpose of this meeting is to check whether or not F42 Final is ready for shipment, according to the release criteria (@amoloney:fedora.im, 17:03:07)
- LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Release_Criteria (@amoloney:fedora.im, 17:03:09)
- INFO: This is determined in this meeting in a few ways: (@amoloney:fedora.im, 17:03:34)
- INFO: 1. A release candidate compose is available (@amoloney:fedora.im, 17:03:51)
- INFO: 2. No remaining blocker bugs (@amoloney:fedora.im, 17:04:00)
- INFO: 3. Test matrices are fully complete (@amoloney:fedora.im, 17:04:13)
- INFO: 4. Fedora CoreOS and IoT are ready (@amoloney:fedora.im, 17:04:20)
- TOPIC:Roll Call (@amoloney:fedora.im, 17:04:25)
- TOPIC:Release Candidate Availability (@amoloney:fedora.im, 17:07:59)
- INFO: The release candidate available is RC-1.1 (@amoloney:fedora.im, 17:10:46)
- TOPIC:Current status - blockers (@amoloney:fedora.im, 17:11:05)
- LINK: https://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/milestone/42/final/buglist (@amoloney:fedora.im, 17:11:19)
- INFO: let's take a look at proposed final blockers (@adamwill:fedora.im, 17:12:01)
- LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2357836 (@adamwill:fedora.im, 17:12:17)
- TOPIC:(2357836) WebUI: list index out of range (@adamwill:fedora.im, 17:12:17)
- INFO: Proposed Blocker, anaconda, ON_QA (@adamwill:fedora.im, 17:12:17)
- LINK: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/1852 (@adamwill:fedora.im, 17:12:17)
- AGREED: 2357836 - RejectedBlocker (Final) AcceptedFreezeException (Final) - this is rejected as a blocker as we think the precedence is too low to block on, it's a very uncommon bug. Anyone affected can reboot and try again. However, a freeze exception is granted as obviously it'd be best to fix this race if we slip (@adamwill:fedora.im, 17:33:12)
- INFO: Ticket vote: FinalBlocker (+0,0,-5) (-boniboyblue, -kparal, -sumantrom, -farribeiro, -geraldosimiao) (@nirik:matrix.scrye.com, 17:34:57)
- TOPIC:(2358741) Support for GNOME X sessions was dropped outgrowing the previously accepted scope of the Wayland transition (@nirik:matrix.scrye.com, 17:34:57)
- LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2358741 (@nirik:matrix.scrye.com, 17:34:57)
- LINK: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/1849 (@nirik:matrix.scrye.com, 17:34:57)
- INFO: Proposed Blocker, gdm, NEW (@nirik:matrix.scrye.com, 17:34:57)
- AGREED: 2358741 - RejectedBlocker(final): This is an engineering design decision and doesn't violate any blocker criteria. (@nirik:matrix.scrye.com, 17:43:34)
- TOPIC:(2358880) Live install sometimes gets stuck during rsync, launching another application unsticks it (@nirik:matrix.scrye.com, 17:43:47)
- INFO: Proposed Blocker, kernel, NEW (@nirik:matrix.scrye.com, 17:43:47)
- LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2358880 (@nirik:matrix.scrye.com, 17:43:47)
- LINK: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/1850 (@nirik:matrix.scrye.com, 17:43:47)
- AGREED: 2358880 - RejectedBlocker(final): this is rejected as a blocker as we think it is too infrequent to block on, it's rare and only on vm installs. Anyone affected can reboot and try again. However, a freeze exception is granted as obviously it'd be best to fix this if we slip (@nirik:matrix.scrye.com, 17:55:19)
- INFO: 5 verified accepted blockers that are fixed in RC-1.1 (@nirik:matrix.scrye.com, 17:56:27)
- INFO: Accepted Blocker, libdnf, NEW (@nirik:matrix.scrye.com, 17:56:38)
- LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2354865 (@nirik:matrix.scrye.com, 17:56:38)
- LINK: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review/issue/1812 (@nirik:matrix.scrye.com, 17:56:38)
- TOPIC:(2354865) libdnf (DNF4) should read DNF5 repo overrides (@nirik:matrix.scrye.com, 17:56:38)
- AGREED: 2354865 - blocker status is waived to Fedora 43 Beta under the "Difficult to fix blocker bugs" category per https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_blocker_bug_process#Exceptional_cases , as the intended fix (porting gnome-software to libdnf5) is not appropriate to land in Fedora 42 at this stage of development (@adamwill:fedora.im, 18:07:18)
- INFO: with that, there are no unaddressed final blockers (@adamwill:fedora.im, 18:07:36)
- TOPIC:Current Status - Test Matrices (@amoloney:fedora.im, 18:12:01)
- LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:Fedora_42_Test_Results (@amoloney:fedora.im, 18:12:13)
- INFO: We have sufficient test coverage in place for F42 final release candidate rc-1.1 (@amoloney:fedora.im, 18:29:32)
- TOPIC:Fedora CoreOS and IoT Release Readiness Check-in (@amoloney:fedora.im, 18:29:48)
- INFO: Both Fedora CoreOS and IoT are release ready (@amoloney:fedora.im, 18:31:33)
- TOPIC:Go/No-Go decision (@amoloney:fedora.im, 18:31:59)
- INFO: I will now poll each group - Releng, QA & FESCo. Please relpy Go or No-Go (@amoloney:fedora.im, 18:32:28)
- AGREED: Fedora Linux 42 Final is GO and will be shipped on Tuesday, April 15 on the early target (@amoloney:fedora.im, 18:33:41)
- ACTION: @amoloney to announce decision and update the schedule accordingly (@amoloney:fedora.im, 18:34:07)
- TOPIC:Open Floor (@amoloney:fedora.im, 18:35:00)
Meeting ended at 18:39:23 UTC
Action items
- @amoloney to announce decision and update the schedule accordingly
People present (lines said)
- @adamwill:fedora.im (91)
- @nirik:matrix.scrye.com (78)
- @amoloney:fedora.im (72)
- @geraldosimiao:matrix.org (68)
- @lruzicka:matrix.org (34)
- @farribeiro:matrix.org (27)
- @conan_kudo:matrix.org (22)
- @zodbot:fedora.im (21)
- @kparal:matrix.org (15)
- @boniboyblue:fedora.im (15)
- @sumantrom:fedora.im (14)
- @lbrabec:matrix.org (10)
- @derekenz:fedora.im (10)
- @mattdm:fedora.im (4)
- @pwhalen:fedora.im (3)
- @marmijo:fedora.im (3)
- @meetbot:fedora.im (2)
- @curtiss:matrix.org (1)
- @frantisekz:fedora.im (1)
- @dustymabe:matrix.org (1)
- @robatino:fedora.im (1)
- @jnsamyak:matrix.org (1)