13:30:22 <dustymabe> #startmeeting
13:30:22 <zodbot> Meeting started Mon Oct 19 13:30:22 2015 UTC.  The chair is dustymabe. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
13:30:22 <zodbot> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic.
13:30:29 <dustymabe> #topic rollcall
13:30:34 <dustymabe> .hellomynameis dustymabe
13:30:35 <zodbot> dustymabe: dustymabe 'Dusty Mabe' <dustymabe@redhat.com>
13:30:48 <[GoerN]> .hellomynameis [goern]
13:30:49 <zodbot> [GoerN]: Sorry, but you don't exist
13:30:53 <cdrage> LOL
13:30:55 <dustymabe> :)
13:30:58 <[GoerN]> well :)
13:30:59 <gallen> .hellomynameis gallen
13:31:00 <zodbot> gallen: Sorry, but you don't exist
13:31:01 <DV> hello
13:31:17 <rtnpro> .fas rtnpro
13:31:17 <zodbot> rtnpro: rtnpro 'Ratnadeep Debnath' <rtnpro@gmail.com>
13:31:32 <aweiteka> .fas aweiteka
13:31:32 <zodbot> aweiteka: aweiteka 'Aaron Weitekamp' <aweiteka@redhat.com>
13:31:33 <DV> dustymabe: I think something should be added in google calendar
13:31:51 <cdrage> .fas cdrage
13:31:51 <zodbot> cdrage: 'cdrage' Not Found!
13:31:52 * aweiteka feels geeky
13:31:58 <dustymabe> DV: I added everyone personally to an invite
13:32:08 <markllama> morning
13:32:09 <cdrage> yup, there is a calendar post
13:32:12 <DV> gallen: don't take it personally, zodbot is new to this :)
13:32:22 <gallen> I am offended.
13:32:25 <dustymabe> DV: I didn't invite you personally
13:32:30 <DV> ahh
13:32:39 <dustymabe> didn't know you wanted to be included but will add you
13:32:45 <dustymabe> ok let's get started
13:33:00 <dustymabe> we basically want short status and any blockers
13:33:02 * markllama hides in the corner from the IntroBot
13:33:11 <[GoerN]> dustymabe, you got my update, I really really need to leave, and: thanks for setting this up I think it will help a lot
13:33:11 <dustymabe> cdrage: you're up first
13:33:20 <dustymabe> [GoerN]: yes
13:33:28 * lalatenduM lurks
13:33:30 * DV watch the show
13:33:37 <cdrage> one sec, just hopping on github
13:33:48 <DV> lalatenduM: you were not invited either ;-) ?
13:34:10 <shippable> aweiteka/atomicapp #29 (oc-client - 9458e80 : aweiteka): Build status -- FAILED
13:34:10 <shippable> Change view: https://github.com/aweiteka/atomicapp/compare/4be47ce7c7c3fe6d72b8bcb245c6266715b7ba28...9458e803a844d35570d897774bb78f975b65e05e
13:34:10 <shippable> Build details: https://app.shippable.com/builds/5624efdb74d4910d000af479
13:34:19 <dustymabe> [GoerN] | so feel free to mention my update: No update since last Thu, offer cdrage any help he needs with doing a release on Wed
13:34:30 <dustymabe> ^^ update from [GoerN]
13:34:39 <lalatenduM> DV: I saw the invite on container-tools , so thats fine :)
13:35:10 <dustymabe> DV: I thought we just wanted the core atomicapp team on this one? At least according to the mail aaron sent me
13:35:22 <cdrage> so no blockers at the moment, working on testing the refactor PR that rtnpro has been working on, really wanting to push beta-3
13:35:23 <DV> oki
13:35:38 <rtnpro> cdrage, yay!
13:35:50 <cdrage> on wednesday I'll be doing the release of whatever we have done so far to our master branch and pushing it to the docker hub / tagged release
13:36:01 <dustymabe> ok vpavlin next
13:36:33 <dustymabe> cdrage is wednesday a hard cutoff date?
13:36:34 <vpavlin> No blockers, Nulecule&Atomic App talk on Docker meetup last week - people looked confused a bit;) But got a request for AWS provider
13:36:39 <DV> cdrage, gallen: any chance to get regression testing going with what we have on git head ?
13:36:55 <DV> vpavlin: confused by ?
13:37:09 <vpavlin> Also presented Nulecule on Fri at work to guys starting some containerized roject
13:37:12 <dustymabe> DV currently we have a topic branch for beta3
13:37:42 <vpavlin> DV: by the whole thing..my perception is that most people who play with containers at the moment do not fight with the problems Nulecule solves, yet
13:37:53 <aweiteka> ack
13:38:10 <cdrage> dustymabe: from my understanding with [GoerN] we will be releasing whatever we have done from the last release to now on master branch and pushing 0.1.12. Yes, it'll be a hard cutoff date, if there is anything after that we can simply push it to 0.1.13 next week
13:38:19 <cdrage> every week
13:38:25 <DV> vpavlin: close the loop with bexelbie so that this is put upfront in doc
13:38:39 <vpavlin> DV: Yeah, he was there, we will talk, I guess:-)
13:38:46 <DV> ok
13:39:03 <vpavlin> I plan to send talk proposal for FOSDEM
13:39:14 <dustymabe> ok gallen you are next
13:39:17 <vpavlin> That's probably all
13:40:01 <gallen> No blockers. Currently trying to get CTF up and running. Plan to start bothering aweiteka immediately thereafter.  And hopefully start some testing as DV asked about.
13:40:17 <dustymabe> gallen: thanks
13:40:35 <dustymabe> aweiteka: you are next
13:41:00 <aweiteka> working on openshift related issues: https://github.com/projectatomic/atomicapp/issues/321
13:41:10 <aweiteka> LABELs are done
13:41:10 <cdrage> DV: to answer your question from before, yes on the regression testing, although I've already implemented this to the cdk2-beta3 branch, we will be adding more once a few bugs are fixed from the refactor
13:41:29 <aweiteka> oc client I'm not happy with but think we need to do it for short term
13:41:35 <dustymabe> aweiteka: any blockers?
13:41:35 <aweiteka> ^^ https://github.com/projectatomic/atomicapp/pull/336
13:42:15 <aweiteka> blockers: i need to see how remote apps work with the new oc model.
13:42:33 <dustymabe> yeah I suspect there are some issues we are going to have to work out there
13:42:34 <aweiteka> params are not in scope so our openshift story will be weak.
13:42:39 <dustymabe> this isn't a beta3 thing is it?
13:42:52 <aweiteka> it's really just a first pass, poc type of thing. yeah
13:42:56 <aweiteka> so no blockers
13:42:56 <dustymabe> ok
13:43:03 <dustymabe> markllama: you are next
13:43:07 <dustymabe> come on down!!
13:43:38 <markllama> No blockers, learning nulecule really for the first time it seems
13:44:05 <dustymabe> markllama: :) get with bexelbie if you have any troubles
13:44:05 <markllama> going to base the mlb demo on wordpress, learning that today
13:44:23 <dustymabe> cool cool
13:44:30 <dustymabe> next up: rtnpro
13:44:43 <rtnpro> ok
13:44:43 <markllama> everyone says this should be easier than I think, and goern suggested modifying the roadshow demo to use the nulecule.  If it turns out that easy, I'll add that.
13:45:33 <rtnpro> so, today,I pushed fix for https://github.com/projectatomic/atomicapp/pull/329
13:46:00 <cdrage> for issue #323
13:46:05 <rtnpro> and after that, I am working on fixing docs and adding docs for the new atomicapp codebase
13:46:06 <rtnpro> https://github.com/rtnpro/atomicapp/commits/cdk2-beta3-rc1-docs
13:46:16 <rtnpro> cdrage, thanks :)
13:46:28 <dustymabe> rtnpro: cool deal
13:46:32 <dustymabe> any blockers?
13:47:10 <rtnpro> dustymabe, nothing specific
13:47:17 <dustymabe> cool
13:47:20 * dustymabe is next
13:47:23 <rtnpro> I need to speak with aweiteka to fix https://github.com/projectatomic/atomicapp/issues/193
13:47:35 <dustymabe> No blockers.. Just working through my issues for beta3 now that we have merged rtnpro's refactor to a topic branch. Lots of work and lots of testing for the next few days.
13:47:52 <dustymabe> did I miss anyone?
13:48:39 <dustymabe> Any questions can be sorted out among individuals after the meeting is over. If there were any blockers please find who can help you and work it out.
13:48:50 <aweiteka> dustymabe, nice job :)
13:48:54 <dustymabe> #endmeeting