14:31:43 #startmeeting "Atomicapp/Nuleucule status meeting" 14:31:43 Meeting started Mon Nov 30 14:31:43 2015 UTC. The chair is dustymabe. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 14:31:43 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 14:31:43 The meeting name has been set to '"atomicapp/nuleucule_status_meeting"' 14:31:49 .hellomynameis dustymabe 14:31:49 .hellomynameis aweiteka 14:31:50 dustymabe: dustymabe 'Dusty Mabe' 14:31:53 aweiteka: aweiteka 'Aaron Weitekamp' 14:31:59 .hellomynameis tkral 14:32:00 tkral: tkral 'Tomas Kral' 14:32:14 .hellomynameis cdrage 14:32:15 cdrage: cdrage 'Charlie Drage' 14:32:18 .fas rtnpro 14:32:18 rtnpro: rtnpro 'Ratnadeep Debnath' 14:32:31 .fas kumarpraveen 14:32:31 praveenkumar: kumarpraveen '' 14:33:19 ok lets get started 14:33:24 rtnpro: want to go first 14:35:09 hmm 14:35:14 we'll come back to him 14:35:19 vpavlin: here? 14:35:25 rtnpro: :) 14:35:42 dustymabe, sorry, got dc 14:35:47 rtnpro_: no worries 14:35:55 do you want to go? status/blockers? 14:36:15 dustymabe, so, I had been exploring atomic-reactor, docker-registry last week for container pipeline 14:36:48 all need to setup a dev jenkins, docker-registry for demo of my work 14:37:23 rtnpro, are you setting up a build service? 14:37:41 rtnpro_: anything related to atomicapp specifically for last week? 14:38:35 :) 14:38:39 ok lets move on for now 14:38:42 tkral: ?? 14:39:02 yep, so I started refactoring openshift provider so that it uses openshift API rather then commandline client. 14:39:10 tkral nice 14:39:30 also have been working on examples for Marathon provider 14:39:52 tkral: cool deal 14:39:58 any blockers? 14:40:10 no blockers 14:40:43 ok 14:40:47 [GoerN]: here? 14:40:51 .fas lalatendu 14:40:52 lalatenduM: lalatendu 'Lalatendu Mohanty' 14:41:22 missing a lot of people today 14:41:36 aweiteka: ^^ 14:41:40 want to go? 14:41:43 looking at implication of a metadata-only Nulecule images, pulling atomicapp out. This should "just work" except for the OpenShift model. 14:42:03 working with the dusty on this :) 14:42:13 no blockers. 14:42:31 cool 14:42:36 dustymabe, do we have an issue for this? 14:42:47 aweiteka: no I don't think so 14:42:55 ok, i'll put one up 14:43:06 I wasn't sure if we needed one since it was still very much an "idea" 14:43:12 and not sure if it was something we were going to go with 14:43:39 it is still something we have to propose to the entire "atomic" ecosystem and see if it flies 14:43:56 one piece of the puzzle was making sure it doesn't break our openshift strategy 14:44:03 which you and I are working with Clayton on 14:44:15 ok, so we keep it an email discuss for now. we should focus the discussion on this decision point then 14:44:22 cdrage: want to go now 14:44:37 no blockers, been working on perisstent storage the past couple of days, had started working on it but ran into a few snags in the actual Nulecule spec, I've commented and tagged the respective people but still waiting for replies, seems quite straightforward to implement. Logging PR is almost done, may add a few other logging-providers before we fully push it (journald, stdout only, etc.). Today and this 14:44:40 week I'll be pushing for all the rest of the respective GA issues to be completed, prioritizing current issues rather than new features after persitent storage / logging PR. 14:44:51 nulecule discussion / issue for persistent storage: https://github.com/projectatomic/nulecule/issues/181 14:45:57 if any of you guys have any insight for how we fix types in pers storage in openshift / kubernetes and applying it to our spec, I'm all ears :) 14:46:00 cdrage: ok.. for the logging to different providers I would open that as a new issue and prioritize it for after january 14:46:47 ok I'll go now 14:46:49 dustymabe: will do, was only going to add stdout and journald as dan walsh previously asked for it and a few others ;) 14:47:16 Short week last week. Working on reviewing PRs and triaging issues for GA release. Also working on strategy for openshift with Aaron/Clayton. No Blockers right now. 14:47:31 that's it for me 14:47:40 dharmit: praveenkumar lalatenduM did you have anything you wanted to add? 14:48:06 dustymabe: I need to updat ethe EPEL rms 14:48:09 rpms* 14:48:20 with latest atomicapp release 14:48:24 Nothing except https://github.com/projectatomic/nulecule-library/pull/8 this, will do soon. 14:48:34 except that iI dont have anything 14:48:34 lalatenduM: cool.. when you do that we need to test and give karma in bodhi 14:49:04 lalatenduM: you don't have anything? 14:49:21 dustymabe: Nope, hope I am not mssing anything 14:49:44 with respect to nulecule/atomicapp 14:49:57 praveenkumar: you need [GoerN] to finish the review on that PR? 14:50:06 ok 14:50:16 dustymabe: nope it's pending from my side, he have some comments 14:50:21 ok cool 14:50:27 I think we are doing with reporting 14:50:41 I would encourage anyone here that has free cycles to work on issues for GA 14:50:42 https://github.com/projectatomic/atomicapp/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+milestone%3A%22CDK+2+GA%22 14:50:46 thanks! 14:50:53 you can ask me questions if you have any 14:50:58 ending meeting now' 14:51:07 #endmeeting