15:02:01 #startmeeting Atomic Developer Bundle Weekly Meeting 15:02:01 Meeting started Mon Feb 8 15:02:01 2016 UTC. The chair is lalatenduM. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 15:02:01 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 15:02:01 The meeting name has been set to 'atomic_developer_bundle_weekly_meeting' 15:02:16 Anyone here for ADB weekly meeting? 15:02:18 .fas dharmit 15:02:19 dharmit: dharmit 'Dharmit Shah' - shahdharmit 'Dharmit Shah' 15:02:22 .mynameis lalatendu 15:02:24 .fas surajd 15:02:24 surajd: surajd 'Suraj Deshmukh' 15:02:24 .fas kumarpraveen 15:02:27 praveenkumar: kumarpraveen '' 15:02:35 .fas bamachrn 15:02:36 bamacharan: bamachrn '' - bamacharankundu 'Bamacharan Kundu' 15:02:38 .fas lalatendu 15:02:39 lalatenduM: lalatendu 'Lalatendu Mohanty' 15:03:02 here are the topics for today meeting 15:03:03 https://titanpad.com/adbmeeting 15:03:50 If you guys wants to add anything, you are welcome 15:04:02 the first topic is from bexelbie 15:04:39 but I think he is not around. so we can move down the topics 15:05:10 #topic ADB release this week 15:05:41 praveenkumar: should we plan to include adb-utils for this weeks ADB release 15:05:45 lalatenduM, I am here - but need to rejoin a meeting 15:05:48 lalatenduM: do we have adb-utils dist-git for centos so we can create package 15:05:49 one sec getting into an elevator 15:06:07 sure bexelbie 15:06:13 praveenkumar: but will it work? as we dont have images cached 15:06:18 bexelbie: np 15:06:38 lalatenduM: yes it should be because in Vagrant file we will pull all required images. 15:06:45 .fas mohammedzee1000 15:06:45 mzee1000: mohammedzee1000 'Mohammed Zeeshan Ahmed' 15:07:11 praveenkumar: ok, then we will coordinate on this 15:07:20 lalatenduM: sure 15:07:48 #action lalatenduM and praveenkumar to work on putting adb-utils in adb and modifying openshift vagrantfile in ADB accordingly 15:07:57 moving to next action item 15:08:15 #topic https://github.com/navidshaikh/vagrant-service-manager/issues/1 15:08:31 praveenkumar: are we going to have `docker pull` in Vagrantfile? 15:08:53 dharmit: yes we are going to have for openshift Vagrant file. 15:09:10 everyone is encouraged to comment on https://github.com/navidshaikh/vagrant-service-manager/issues/1 15:09:54 anything else on this topic , or should we move to the next topic 15:10:00 please push my item to next week - I really need to focus on this in person meeting 15:10:10 bexelbie: sure 15:10:15 next topic 15:10:26 #topic ssues on adb-utils https://github.com/projectatomic/adb-utils/issues @praveenkumar 15:11:00 So we have currently bunch of open issue just want to point out if someone also want to work on these. 15:11:49 I sent PR which will resolve some issue and then we have first round of review. 15:12:09 praveenkumar: currenty there are 4 issues which needs discussion https://github.com/projectatomic/adb-utils/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+label%3A%22needs+discussion%22 15:12:21 .fas tuxdna 15:12:21 tuxdna: tuxdna '' 15:13:10 lalatenduM: yes for template there is already discussion going on ML and Pete pointed out some so will follow up with it. 15:13:24 praveenkumar: I think you need to add more context to https://github.com/projectatomic/adb-utils/issues/1 , specifying what needs to be dscussed 15:13:38 praveenkumar: right we can remove the tag from templates issue 15:14:01 lalatenduM: sure I will add some context to #1 issue 15:14:02 praveenkumar: I have also asked Pete to pint us to the template files 15:15:12 #10 we have a workaround 15:15:25 that's all from my side. 15:16:08 praveenkumar: isn't the ose image should handle the kill command 15:16:41 lalatenduM: I will discuss that offline, it will take some time. 15:16:56 praveenkumar: also I am fine with fixing the reload option in https://github.com/projectatomic/adb-utils/issues/5 , but it is not priority 15:17:13 ok, moving on 15:17:38 #topic Inputs on https://github.com/projectatomic/adb-atomic-developer-bundle/issues/195 @dharmit 15:18:02 dharmit: anything specific you want to bring here 15:18:24 pradeepto: lalatenduM: Can you guys suggest on the last comment I made on the issue today? That's all I need. Totally ok with a response on gh and not here. 15:18:44 dharmit: will do, thanks for bringing it up 15:18:56 sure dharmit 15:19:31 lalatenduM: regarding reload option I am not sure how we handle it, does that mean just reload openshift container? 15:19:51 praveenkumar: yeah, restarting the containers 15:20:30 praveenkumar: bascically we need to do equivlent of service reload with docker containers 15:21:10 restarting the containers, but we need to delete the existing stuff in openshft 15:21:32 that would be the difference between just restart vs reload 15:22:08 lalatenduM: we need some more details about it, will ask hardy. for me in openshift case restart and reload is same (and it's not like every service require reload) 15:23:00 praveenkumar: agree 15:23:49 #topic openfloor 15:24:12 #action praveenkumar have to get more details for reload option in service file 15:24:15 Do we have a topic to discuss in openfloor 15:24:41 I don't have anything. 15:24:42 praveenkumar: lets check how systemd understands it 15:24:48 yes 15:26:14 looks like we dont have any topic for openfloor 15:26:25 will end the meeting in 1.. 15:26:45 2.. 15:27:09 3.. 15:27:14 #endmeeting