13:01:33 <lalatenduM> #startmeeting ADB 13:01:33 <zodbot> Meeting started Mon Aug 8 13:01:33 2016 UTC. The chair is lalatenduM. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 13:01:33 <zodbot> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 13:01:33 <zodbot> The meeting name has been set to 'adb' 13:01:43 <lalatenduM> #topic rollcall 13:01:49 <lalatenduM> .fas lalatendu 13:01:50 <zodbot> lalatenduM: lalatendu 'Lalatendu Mohanty' <lmohanty@redhat.com> 13:02:15 <praveenkumar> .fas kumarpraveen 13:02:15 <zodbot> praveenkumar: kumarpraveen '' <kumarpraveen.nitdgp@gmail.com> 13:03:01 <lalatenduM> bexelbie: nshaikh budhram are you guys around for meeting 13:03:18 * bexelbie is here 13:03:23 <bexelbie> .hello bex 13:03:24 <zodbot> bexelbie: bex 'Brian (bex) Exelbierd' <bex@pobox.com> 13:03:28 <budhram> .hello budhram 13:03:30 <zodbot> budhram: budhram 'Budh Ram Gurung' <bgurung@redhat.com> 13:05:31 <lalatenduM> Please add topics here https://titanpad.com/adbmeeting 13:06:42 <lalatenduM> #topic ADB-release 13:06:54 <lalatenduM> last week we missed the release 13:07:20 <lalatenduM> Also this release it is better because we will have the proxy fix from adb-utils 13:07:39 <lalatenduM> and also landrsuh integration 13:07:56 <lalatenduM> Anyone comments/question on this topic? 13:08:22 <praveenkumar> Nothing from my side. 13:08:32 <budhram> no from my side too 13:08:36 <lalatenduM> cool 13:09:04 <lalatenduM> moving to next topic 13:09:20 <lalatenduM> #topic VSM release this week 13:09:24 <budhram> Last week, we did bug fix release for VSM. Now we will do feature release this week with version 1.3.0 which will contain client installation support for docker, openshift and kubectl in CDK 13:09:55 <lalatenduM> budhram: are you planning to do the release before Thursday? 13:10:12 <budhram> Most of work done except kubectl part. Should be done in couple of days. Re: Before thursday: Yes 13:11:06 <budhram> bexelbie: do we need to discuss renaming of project here? 13:11:18 <bexelbie> I'll be happy to add that to the agenda 13:12:22 <lalatenduM> moving to the next topic 13:12:32 <lalatenduM> #topic adb-utils 13:12:39 <lalatenduM> praveenkumar: ^ 13:13:27 <praveenkumar> So we are going to have new release 1.10 which will include fix from landrush side may be tomorrow. 13:13:41 <lalatenduM> praveenkumar: cool 13:13:56 <lalatenduM> anything else on this topic 13:14:19 <lalatenduM> praveenkumar: hopefully we can make it to this week's ADB release 13:14:46 <praveenkumar> lalatenduM: yes that is the plan because then landrush integration will also can be part of it. 13:15:58 <lalatenduM> praveenkumar: BTW https://github.com/projectatomic/adb-atomic-developer-bundle/pull/462/files only has ose-CDK change , we need to do the same for CentOS 13:16:27 <praveenkumar> lalatenduM: yes ack. 13:16:48 <lalatenduM> moving to next topic 13:16:58 <lalatenduM> #topic namechange 13:17:13 <lalatenduM> bexelbie: has sent a mail about it to the mailing list 13:17:23 <bexelbie> #link https://github.com/projectatomic/adb-atomic-developer-bundle/issues/495 13:17:38 <bexelbie> The email sums it up, but to summarize here 13:17:53 <bexelbie> ADB short-circuits conversations and turns them into naming conventions and not talks about technology 13:18:01 <lalatenduM> all, please comment/suggest either in the mail of in the issue 13:18:06 <lalatenduM> s/of/or/ 13:18:06 <bexelbie> a new name is hard, but perhaps with a slight massage of one letter we can make this stop 13:18:13 <bexelbie> hence PADB (prounounced pad-b) 13:18:21 <bexelbie> yes, comment in the issue or email, ideally issue 13:19:32 <lalatenduM> bexelbie: personally I am not able to create an opinion around the new name 13:19:38 <budhram> PADB full form to Project Atomic Developer Bundle? 13:19:58 <lalatenduM> budhram: yes 13:20:02 <bexelbie> yes 13:20:43 * concaf_ likes PADB 13:21:20 <praveenkumar> +1 for PADB 13:21:56 <lalatenduM> bexelbie: lokks like we are getting support for PADB 13:21:57 <budhram> bexelbie: mail says we announce as "pad bee", so more stress on Bundle 13:21:59 <lalatenduM> :) 13:22:23 <bexelbie> I consider pad-b and "pad bee" to read the same 13:22:37 <bexelbie> I promise to make a recording of me saying it to prevent having to use the nulecule option :P 13:23:47 <lalatenduM> moving to open floor 13:23:54 <lalatenduM> #topic open-floor 13:25:51 <lalatenduM> looks like we do not have a topic for openfloor 13:26:00 <lalatenduM> closing the meeting in 1 minute 13:26:04 <bexelbie> The floor appears to be clean 13:26:15 <lalatenduM> :) 13:26:30 <budhram> +1 13:27:45 <lalatenduM> #endmeeting