13:01:33 <lalatenduM> #startmeeting ADB
13:01:33 <zodbot> Meeting started Mon Aug  8 13:01:33 2016 UTC.  The chair is lalatenduM. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
13:01:33 <zodbot> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic.
13:01:33 <zodbot> The meeting name has been set to 'adb'
13:01:43 <lalatenduM> #topic rollcall
13:01:49 <lalatenduM> .fas lalatendu
13:01:50 <zodbot> lalatenduM: lalatendu 'Lalatendu Mohanty' <lmohanty@redhat.com>
13:02:15 <praveenkumar> .fas kumarpraveen
13:02:15 <zodbot> praveenkumar: kumarpraveen '' <kumarpraveen.nitdgp@gmail.com>
13:03:01 <lalatenduM> bexelbie: nshaikh budhram are you guys around for meeting
13:03:18 * bexelbie is here
13:03:23 <bexelbie> .hello bex
13:03:24 <zodbot> bexelbie: bex 'Brian (bex) Exelbierd' <bex@pobox.com>
13:03:28 <budhram> .hello budhram
13:03:30 <zodbot> budhram: budhram 'Budh Ram Gurung' <bgurung@redhat.com>
13:05:31 <lalatenduM> Please add topics here https://titanpad.com/adbmeeting
13:06:42 <lalatenduM> #topic ADB-release
13:06:54 <lalatenduM> last week we missed the release
13:07:20 <lalatenduM> Also this release it is better because we will have the proxy fix from adb-utils
13:07:39 <lalatenduM> and also landrsuh integration
13:07:56 <lalatenduM> Anyone comments/question on this topic?
13:08:22 <praveenkumar> Nothing from my side.
13:08:32 <budhram> no from my side too
13:08:36 <lalatenduM> cool
13:09:04 <lalatenduM> moving to next topic
13:09:20 <lalatenduM> #topic VSM release this week
13:09:24 <budhram> Last week, we did bug fix release for VSM. Now we will do feature release this week with version 1.3.0 which will contain client installation support for docker, openshift and kubectl in CDK
13:09:55 <lalatenduM> budhram: are you planning to do the release before Thursday?
13:10:12 <budhram> Most of work done except kubectl part. Should be done in couple of days. Re: Before thursday: Yes
13:11:06 <budhram> bexelbie: do we need to discuss renaming of project here?
13:11:18 <bexelbie> I'll be happy to add that to the agenda
13:12:22 <lalatenduM> moving to the next topic
13:12:32 <lalatenduM> #topic adb-utils
13:12:39 <lalatenduM> praveenkumar: ^
13:13:27 <praveenkumar> So we are going to have new release 1.10 which will include fix from landrush side may be tomorrow.
13:13:41 <lalatenduM> praveenkumar: cool
13:13:56 <lalatenduM> anything else on this topic
13:14:19 <lalatenduM> praveenkumar: hopefully we can make it to this week's ADB release
13:14:46 <praveenkumar> lalatenduM: yes that is the plan because then landrush integration will also can be part of it.
13:15:58 <lalatenduM> praveenkumar: BTW https://github.com/projectatomic/adb-atomic-developer-bundle/pull/462/files only has ose-CDK change , we need to do the same for CentOS
13:16:27 <praveenkumar> lalatenduM: yes ack.
13:16:48 <lalatenduM> moving to next topic
13:16:58 <lalatenduM> #topic namechange
13:17:13 <lalatenduM> bexelbie: has sent a mail about it to the mailing list
13:17:23 <bexelbie> #link https://github.com/projectatomic/adb-atomic-developer-bundle/issues/495
13:17:38 <bexelbie> The email sums it up, but to summarize here
13:17:53 <bexelbie> ADB short-circuits conversations and turns them into naming conventions and not talks about technology
13:18:01 <lalatenduM> all, please comment/suggest either in the mail of in the issue
13:18:06 <lalatenduM> s/of/or/
13:18:06 <bexelbie> a new name is hard, but perhaps with a slight massage of one letter we can make this stop
13:18:13 <bexelbie> hence PADB (prounounced pad-b)
13:18:21 <bexelbie> yes, comment in the issue or email, ideally issue
13:19:32 <lalatenduM> bexelbie: personally I am not able to create an opinion around the new name
13:19:38 <budhram> PADB full form to Project Atomic Developer Bundle?
13:19:58 <lalatenduM> budhram: yes
13:20:02 <bexelbie> yes
13:20:43 * concaf_ likes PADB
13:21:20 <praveenkumar> +1 for PADB
13:21:56 <lalatenduM> bexelbie: lokks like we are getting support for PADB
13:21:57 <budhram> bexelbie: mail says we announce as "pad bee", so more stress on Bundle
13:21:59 <lalatenduM> :)
13:22:23 <bexelbie> I consider pad-b and "pad bee" to read the same
13:22:37 <bexelbie> I promise to make a recording of me saying it to prevent having to use the nulecule option :P
13:23:47 <lalatenduM> moving to open floor
13:23:54 <lalatenduM> #topic open-floor
13:25:51 <lalatenduM> looks like we do not have a topic for openfloor
13:26:00 <lalatenduM> closing the meeting in 1 minute
13:26:04 <bexelbie> The floor appears to be clean
13:26:15 <lalatenduM> :)
13:26:30 <budhram> +1
13:27:45 <lalatenduM> #endmeeting