15:02:30 #startmeeting RDO meeting - 2016-09-07 15:02:30 Meeting started Wed Sep 7 15:02:30 2016 UTC. The chair is number80. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 15:02:30 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 15:02:30 The meeting name has been set to 'rdo_meeting_-_2016-09-07' 15:02:31 Meeting started Wed Sep 7 15:02:30 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is number80. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 15:02:32 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 15:02:35 The meeting name has been set to 'rdo_meeting___2016_09_07' 15:02:35 #topic roll call 15:02:40 \o/ 15:02:40 who's here 15:02:42 o/ 15:02:44 o/ 15:02:45 o/ hi guys! 15:02:46 o/ 15:02:47 o/ 15:02:47 \o/ 15:02:49 hi 15:02:53 agenda is here, please complete: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/RDO-Meeting 15:02:54 o/ 15:03:08 #chair chandankumar jruzicka myoung dmellado flepied snarwade imcsk8 jpena 15:03:08 Current chairs: chandankumar dmellado flepied imcsk8 jpena jruzicka myoung number80 snarwade 15:03:08 Current chairs: chandankumar dmellado flepied imcsk8 jpena jruzicka myoung number80 snarwade 15:03:10 * Duck o/ 15:03:15 o/ 15:03:19 #chair Duck coolsvap apevec 15:03:19 Current chairs: Duck apevec chandankumar coolsvap dmellado flepied imcsk8 jpena jruzicka myoung number80 snarwade 15:03:19 Current chairs: Duck apevec chandankumar coolsvap dmellado flepied imcsk8 jpena jruzicka myoung number80 snarwade 15:03:26 ok, we have quorum 15:03:31 o/ 15:03:39 #chair trown 15:03:39 Current chairs: Duck apevec chandankumar coolsvap dmellado flepied imcsk8 jpena jruzicka myoung number80 snarwade trown 15:03:41 Current chairs: Duck apevec chandankumar coolsvap dmellado flepied imcsk8 jpena jruzicka myoung number80 snarwade trown 15:04:02 * social_ is here but also in other meeting so... 15:04:19 trown: wants to take over? 15:04:59 sure... forgot :P 15:05:11 trown: then starts with the next topic :) 15:05:22 #topic Test day readiness 15:05:42 tl;dr we don't know yet :( 15:05:58 current job failed on expired certs 15:06:01 as luck would have it 15:06:02 ya, I am fairly hopeful though 15:06:24 jpena is fixing certs as we type 15:06:33 yeah, previous promotion was 11 days ago 15:06:41 we have all of the image hosting setup, just need to get a promote 15:06:54 though, it shouldn't be much different from actual M3 15:06:55 but we'll lett current #705 run to see 3o quickstart jobs 15:07:12 anything else on this? 15:07:17 * number80 ok 15:07:18 trown, how is the speed from new d/l ? 15:07:29 apevec: variable... because it is OS1 15:07:43 yesterday it was taking 45 minutes to get the image for me, today 5 15:07:48 hello guys, I from software-factory, flepied said you have an issue with cert ? 15:08:11 both of which are better than 3 hours though 15:08:13 atarakt, we do, CC jpena 15:08:24 ok moving on 15:08:30 #topic Moving redhat-openstack/tempest reviews from gerrithub to r.o.o (chandankumar) 15:08:32 atarakt, jpena found http://softwarefactory-project.io/redmine/issues//1303 15:08:56 #undo 15:08:56 Removing item from minutes: 15:09:06 atarakt, jpena found http://softwarefactory-project.io/redmine/issues//1303 15:09:16 atarakt, but can you PM jpena 15:09:20 o/ 15:09:30 so we keep topics going (meeting now) 15:09:35 #chair jschlueter 15:09:35 Current chairs: Duck apevec chandankumar coolsvap dmellado flepied imcsk8 jpena jruzicka jschlueter myoung number80 snarwade trown 15:09:37 #topic Moving redhat-openstack/tempest reviews from gerrithub to r.o.o (chandankumar) 15:09:52 I think chandankumar left for dinner 15:10:01 apevec: ok, I will check with jpena 15:10:01 apevec: I can take over otherwise 15:10:10 my concern is in etherpad, why don't we just get rid of it :) 15:10:11 I and dmellado was thinking about moving redhat-openstack/tempest from gerrithub to r.o.o 15:10:19 I mean tempest fork 15:10:38 dmellado: go ahead. 15:10:49 chandankumar: I thought you were gone, but that's basically it 15:11:08 as of now the tempest fork is hosted on gerrithub and we were thinking about having it moved under the rdo gerrit 15:11:30 that would make it look like endorsed, which is not the right message 15:11:42 what is the time frame to split out just the config tool? 15:11:47 I'd keep old branches where they are and remove the fork asap 15:11:49 mmm apevec I see your point there 15:11:51 trown, it was already split 15:12:03 oh 15:12:12 trown: the config tool split it's ongoing 15:12:22 I'm creating a repo under git.openstack 15:12:24 for that 15:12:39 WIP, didn't have that much time this week, but there's a roadmap for it 15:13:06 dmellado, this one? https://github.com/redhat-openstack/python-tempestconf 15:13:27 apevec: yep, but that need to be done 15:13:37 it's not still complete by any means 15:13:43 right, and then all jobs changed to actually use it? 15:13:44 k, so consensus is to leave tempest fork where it is with the idea that we want to remove it soon? 15:13:58 and I'd prefer for that to leave under git.openstack 15:14:07 dmellado: +1 15:14:12 *nods* 15:14:18 dmellado, yes, I understood redhat-openstack is just a PoC > 15:14:19 ? 15:14:22 fine from my side if we're meant to deprecate it 15:14:25 apevec: exactly 15:14:54 then consensus for the fork to stay where it is 15:15:05 +1 15:15:18 +1 15:15:29 +1 15:15:31 we need to make sure we will be sending tempest config patches to the new repos if anyone have. 15:15:39 *repo 15:15:44 #agreed leave tempest fork where it is and deprecate as soon as possible 15:16:08 chandankumar: I'll send an email to the ML when that's done 15:16:17 until then, keep sending any patches to the in-tree 15:16:53 moving on? 15:17:07 yep 15:17:10 yup! 15:17:12 #topic Adding repo files for CI-tested repos in buildlogs CDN 15:17:37 #info Background: https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=11090 15:17:51 this is mine 15:18:10 Some time ago we tried to get some .repo files for our current-passed-ci repos under buildlogs 15:18:19 somehow it got forgotten, until today 15:18:27 do we still think it's a good idea to have them? 15:19:24 I am kind of confused what the use case is 15:19:28 we could also have those in rdo-release.rpm 15:19:34 goal? 15:19:40 yes and no 15:19:43 trown, make jobs actually use CDN 15:19:46 jschlueter, because of the '-maxdepth 2' we did not collected the 2th subdirs like manifest, ill. change it to 3 15:19:52 otherwise they just take delorean.repo from CDN 15:19:58 which is waste 15:20:18 those .repo files still references snapshots 15:20:29 ah, the delorean.repo points to non-CDN files... got it 15:20:29 yeah, on trunk.rdoproject.org 15:20:52 trown, weshay so question is for CI folks: 15:20:55 http://buildlogs.centos.org/centos/7/cloud/x86_64/rdo-trunk-master-tested/delorean.repo 15:21:06 could jobs be modified easily to take .repo from rdo-release.rpm ? 15:21:22 we have current-passed-ci aka -tested in there 15:21:43 https://github.com/redhat-openstack/rdo-release/blob/newton/rdo-testing.repo 15:22:01 hmm... it is a bit tricky with the image-based deploy we have now 15:22:07 not -tripleo, not sure where put that one 15:22:13 running everything would be fairly easy, I think we would just need to add something to find the hash for other purposes 15:22:20 ok, we were speaking about rdo-testing.repo 15:22:32 trown, oh, you mean .repo ends up in the image 15:22:33 apevec, it's worth creating a card for it 15:22:40 because we need to use trunk.rdoproject.org to actually validate, but we then use that same image for gate jobs later 15:22:47 weshay, ack 15:23:10 weshay, there's also task to capture the whole repo inside the image? 15:23:16 iiuc 15:23:55 apevec: that needs further discussion. I would like to bring it up on openstack-dev[TripleO] and come to some consensus about the undercloud image 15:23:56 jpena, can you take an action to create a card for CI part of this and assign to weshay ? 15:24:03 apevec: sure 15:24:25 #action jpena to create cart for CI part of using CDN, assign to weshay 15:25:46 trown, so is the plan to let the rdo-master job complete, then rekick w/ the same pin? 15:25:51 weshay: ya 15:26:04 from #705 - all 3 packastack jobs are green 15:26:08 so looks good 15:26:15 ok next topic? 15:26:27 #topic 15:26:32 #undo 15:26:32 Removing item from minutes: 15:26:38 #topic newton-rdo branching status [hguemar] 15:27:11 number80 ^ 15:27:22 number80, good progress on that! 15:27:41 do you see anything which could be partitioned and distributed among us? 15:27:48 #info oslo libs are getting forked for newton 15:28:24 apevec: as of now, I'd rather have people take over other reviews, it's quite tedious and error-prone 15:28:36 ack 15:28:49 #info everybody take over RDO-NEWTON reviews 15:28:57 *nodes* 15:29:01 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=RDO-NEWTON 15:29:57 #action apevec to report RDO-NEWTON progress for the next meeting 15:29:57 tomorrow will be clients 15:30:01 EOL 15:30:32 expect beg/borrow/steal from me ;) 15:30:44 yup 15:31:04 ok, next topic 15:31:05 #topic anouncements 15:31:20 #info Newton milestone 3 test day is this Thursday and Friday. Please participate.https://www.rdoproject.org/testday/newton/milestone3/ 15:31:39 #info Demos/Q&A at RDO booth at OpenStack Summit Barcelonad - signup at https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/rdo-barcelona-summit-booth 15:31:51 Barcelona, without the d 15:31:53 :-) 15:31:54 #info Ping me (rbowen) ASAP if there's anything you want in the newsletter (going out later today) - https://github.com/rbowen/rdo-website/blob/master/source/newsletter/2016-september.html.md 15:31:58 Thanks. 15:32:06 :) 15:32:16 ack 15:34:20 anything else? 15:34:32 #topic open floor 15:34:42 I'd like to ask about tripleo update job, do we have such job? Can we add at least no-op ideally from ci-tested to new-ci-tested as part of promotion job? 15:35:05 yes 15:35:08 several 15:35:30 no-op ? 15:35:46 apevec: tripleo update where yum update won't update anything :) 15:35:54 the history on update/upgrade jobs folks is that historically they take too long to run.. 4-5 hrs 15:36:24 we can add mitaka -> master to the current-tripleo rdo pipeline but just looking for a good time to do it 15:36:52 weshay: the update(not upgrade) job shouldn't take that long 15:37:06 mitaka -> master has been passing.. failed in the most recent runs, matbu and apetrich are getting upstream to work atm.. 15:37:20 yum update which doesn't update anything, isn't that FAIL ? :) 15:37:46 that means there are no new packages 15:37:54 btw, review.rdoproject.org is now back 15:38:00 jpena++ 15:38:08 jpena++ thanks 15:38:15 jpena++ 15:38:15 imcsk8: Karma for jpena changed to 6 (for the f24 release cycle): https://badges.fedoraproject.org/tags/cookie/any 15:38:17 jpena, make sure to document the steps 15:39:17 anything else for the meeting, or should we call it? 15:39:30 social_, there are update and upgrade jobs available, just waiting on the right time to gate a promotion on it.. I don't think today is the day.. but I do have matbu and apetrich reporting back to us if the hash we promote for newton 3 works w/ upgrades 15:39:38 trown: chair call pending. 15:39:42 trown, next chair! 15:39:46 chandankumar: ah thanks :) 15:39:57 #topic next chair 15:41:01 anyone? :) 15:41:03 did my IRC drop :P 15:41:19 if not then i can take it. 15:41:25 deafening /dev/null :) 15:41:42 thanks chandankumar 15:41:49 #info chandankumar to chair next meeting 15:41:58 trown: Thanks :-) 15:42:00 #endmeeting