13:31:05 #startmeeting RDO Office Hour - 2017-08-29 13:31:05 Meeting started Tue Aug 29 13:31:05 2017 UTC. The chair is chandankumar. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 13:31:06 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 13:31:06 The meeting name has been set to 'rdo_office_hour_-_2017-08-29' 13:31:07 Meeting started Tue Aug 29 13:31:05 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is chandankumar. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 13:31:08 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 13:31:11 The meeting name has been set to 'rdo_office_hour___2017_08_29' 13:31:32 #topic Roll Call 13:31:52 rbowen: dmsimard apevec number80 jpena jschlueter|znc office hour time 13:31:58 o/ 13:33:33 #chair number80 13:33:33 Current chairs: chandankumar number80 13:33:34 Current chairs: chandankumar number80 13:34:03 o/ 13:34:13 Here is the RDO office hour agenda link : https://review.rdoproject.org/etherpad/p/rdo-office-hour-easyfixes 13:34:19 #chair jpena 13:34:19 Current chairs: chandankumar jpena number80 13:34:20 Current chairs: chandankumar jpena number80 13:34:27 Good morning, all. 13:34:33 #chair rbowen 13:34:33 Current chairs: chandankumar jpena number80 rbowen 13:34:34 Current chairs: chandankumar jpena number80 rbowen 13:35:44 Here comes the Agenda one by one 13:36:13 * Easyfix Review cleanup: https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/q/status:open+branch:rpm-master+easyfix 13:36:44 * Cleanup easyfix issues https://github.com/redhat-openstack/easyfix/issues/ 13:36:54 Javier Peña proposed openstack/watcher-distgit rpm-master: Removed BuildRequires/Requires: python-coverage from .spec https://review.rdoproject.org/r/8458 13:37:04 * Answering and closing unanswered ask.openstack.org questions addressed https://ask.openstack.org/en/questions/scope:unanswered/sort:age-desc/page:1/query:rdo/ 13:37:23 * Pike requirements sync pending packages https://review.rdoproject.org/etherpad/p/pike-release-preparation 13:37:37 * Final copy for https://github.com/redhat-openstack/website/blob/master/source/blog/2017-09-01-rdo-pike-released.html.md (RDO Pike release announcement) 13:37:54 * Generating a list of contributors for the same 13:38:35 that's it i think 13:38:43 Feel free to pick anyone and start working on that 13:39:40 Hi guys, i added a fix for tacker pike systemd service, its been in review queue for a week, could someone review it? https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/8793/ 13:48:00 mrunge: hello 13:49:47 mrunge: we need your comment on this issue https://github.com/redhat-openstack/easyfix/issues/11 related to coverage 13:53:11 Mike Fedosin proposed rdoinfo master: Remove under-review tag for glare and glareclient https://review.rdoproject.org/r/9051 13:53:54 Merged openstack/murano-agent-distgit rpm-master: Removed BuildRequires/Requires: python-coverage from .spec https://review.rdoproject.org/r/8467 14:01:04 jpena: argh, I was certain the weirdo jobs had been moved to rdo cloud once we enabled bfv 14:01:11 sorry :( 14:04:03 sshnaidm: no, the web interface was especially locked down after the last few vulnerabilities 14:04:19 dmsimard, ok 14:04:21 sshnaidm: and it's on the way out, we're migrating to full zuul soon. What did you need from the job configuration ? 14:04:29 dmsimard: no worries. Those jobs need to run on the rdo-nodepool tenant, right? 14:04:56 dmsimard, just a full view of job config, but I'm fine with generated xml 14:05:13 jpena: yes 14:05:29 ack, then I didn't break anything with my change 14:05:42 sshnaidm: yeah I guess you can run jjb to spit the xml out 14:11:51 will it fixes the heisen-CI jobs? 14:12:12 -es 14:14:22 Merged config master: Remove qcow image upload from container build job https://review.rdoproject.org/r/9053 14:15:45 Jon Schlueter created openstack/horizon-distgit rpm-master: move python-django-babel to guarded block https://review.rdoproject.org/r/9054 14:19:25 apevec, can you check and vote on: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/498684/, required for ocata promotion 14:23:01 If you are willing to review packages feel free to take a look at RDO-PIKE tracker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1427510 14:23:02 bugzilla.redhat.com bug 1427510 in distribution "Tracker: Blockers and Review requests for new RDO Pike packages" [Unspecified,New] - Assigned to apevec 14:23:48 number80: it is waiting on you https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1433898 14:23:48 bugzilla.redhat.com bug 1433898 in Package Review "New package: Sushy" [Unspecified,Post] - Assigned to mrunge 14:25:22 chandankumar: they're already published 14:25:37 https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/hguemar/rdo-packager/package/mock-rdo-config/ 14:25:55 I'll refresh the build 14:27:54 https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/9051/2 14:28:18 ^btw I think incorrect config sneaked in for glare in rdoinfo 14:28:32 Make sure to get it fixed before merging 14:28:56 number80: ah i closed the bz containing the review 14:29:20 number80: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1436029 14:29:21 bugzilla.redhat.com bug 1436029 in Package Review "openstack-glare - Unified Artifact Repository" [Unspecified,Closed: currentrelease] - Assigned to amoralej 14:29:22 Well, it took me two revisions to notice 14:29:54 (and it was likely silently failing before) 14:30:01 *not failing 14:30:05 Pradeep Kilambi created openstack/gnocchi-distgit newton-rdo: Rebase to 3.0.14 https://review.rdoproject.org/r/9055 14:31:33 pradk: there's a periodic job doing these rebase, was it failing for some reason? (if it is, we'd like to get it fixed) 14:31:53 number80, not fast enough :) 14:32:04 whats the frequency of the periodic job? 14:33:04 number80, we need this d/s soon.. so i just put a rebase 14:33:12 ok 14:33:34 well, it can be too fast, so I'm not surprised it can be too slow :) 14:38:36 Mike Fedosin proposed rdoinfo master: Remove under-review tag for glare and glareclient https://review.rdoproject.org/r/9051 14:39:02 amuller: number80 I am not sure whom can i ping for this package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1421701 please have a look 14:39:03 bugzilla.redhat.com bug 1421701 in Package Review "Review Request: openstack-neutron-bgp-dragent" [Medium,Assigned] - Assigned to karlthered 14:39:26 chandankumar: likely mine 14:39:56 "Please submit spec file in gerrit after project creation" 14:40:40 project was not created ... 14:40:53 Raildo Mascena de Sousa Filho proposed rdoinfo master: Add myself as maintainer for patrole tempest plugin https://review.rdoproject.org/r/9031 14:41:01 bnemec: hello 14:41:18 bnemec: please send a rdoinfo review to remove under-review tag for this bz https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1420931 14:41:19 bugzilla.redhat.com bug 1420931 in Package Review "Review Request: tripleo-repos - repo management tool for tripleo" [Medium,Assigned] - Assigned to apevec 14:41:25 there's no rdoinfo request, so I'll postpone it to queen 14:41:37 number80: time to create a pike tracker 14:41:44 apevec: are you taking care of creating the RDO-QUEEN tracker? ^ 14:41:53 s/pike/Queens 14:42:43 rbowen: i think we can publish a list of packages added in Pike Release from this bz https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1427510 14:42:44 bugzilla.redhat.com bug 1427510 in distribution "Tracker: Blockers and Review requests for new RDO Pike packages" [Unspecified,New] - Assigned to apevec 14:42:45 chandankumar: It hasn't been reviewed yet though. 14:43:29 bnemec: spec file is imported https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/6882/ as per this review 14:43:31 chandankumar: Thanks! So, each of those tickets is a new package? 14:43:36 rbowen: yes 14:43:46 ok, I'll get right on that. That could take a while. 14:43:51 rbowen: crossed one bz having packages available 14:43:55 in RDO 14:43:57 ha doc link is broken 14:44:03 Anybody have a suggestion of how to generate a list of all contributors? 14:44:38 * chandankumar is not sure software factory repoexplorer generates list of contributors 14:44:47 jpena: dmsimard ^^ 14:44:55 jpena, fbo_: do you have link for repoxplorer? 14:45:08 It does, you can even restrict the time period 14:45:08 I don't think repoexplorer is enabled for review.rdo 14:45:18 no, it's not 14:45:19 We could enable it 14:45:29 dmsimard: fbo_ used to have a test deployment 14:45:35 (with actual data) 14:45:57 You can see it on the real sf.io here https://softwarefactory-project.io/repoxplorer/ 14:46:43 dmsimard: but not with RDO data :( 14:47:00 number80: eh, that's the best I can do for now 14:47:21 number80: we can surely enable repoexplorer, let me look 14:47:31 dmsimard: thanks :-) 14:48:54 number80: i think we can merge this review https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/8315/ 14:48:59 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1435191 14:49:01 bugzilla.redhat.com bug 1435191 in Package Review "New package: osops-tools-monitoring-oschecks" [Unspecified,Assigned] - Assigned to hguemar 14:49:11 chandankumar, number80: repoexplorer requires elasticsearch 14:49:17 which is not yet deployed for review.rdo 14:49:20 so it'll have to wait 14:49:45 number80: but you need to submit fedora -review on that 14:49:52 Merged rdo-infra/rdo-dashboards master: Set Pike GA timer https://review.rdoproject.org/r/9052 14:51:20 Ben Nemec created rdoinfo master: Remove under-review tag from tripleo-repos https://review.rdoproject.org/r/9056 14:52:03 chandankumar: for osops-tools-monitoring-oschecks? it's ok 14:53:02 bnemec: we donot need pike for this https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/9056/ ? 14:53:26 chandankumar: We didn't switch to using it in Pike, so no. 14:53:30 trown created config master: Upload images from one periodic ovb job for each release https://review.rdoproject.org/r/9057 14:53:58 * number80 will be off for few hours and back 14:54:06 I need my daily sun fix 14:54:25 sshnaidm: adarazs https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/9057/ gets us image upload back (from one ovb job like upstream) 14:54:26 Actually it should be a branchless project anyway. 14:56:00 trown: cool, looking. 14:56:18 bnemec: for all branchless project, we maintain a branch for each release, so that we can build the package for the same 14:57:14 Mike Fedosin proposed rdoinfo master: Remove under-review tag for glare and glareclient https://review.rdoproject.org/r/9051 14:58:02 Christopher Brown proposed openstack/horizon-distgit rpm-master: Removed BuildRequires/Requires: python-coverage from .spec https://review.rdoproject.org/r/8464 15:01:53 #info we have cleanup RDO-Pike package review queue https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1427510 15:01:54 bugzilla.redhat.com bug 1427510 in distribution "Tracker: Blockers and Review requests for new RDO Pike packages" [Unspecified,New] - Assigned to apevec 15:01:59 \o/ 15:02:13 Merged openstack/gnocchi-distgit newton-rdo: Rebase to 3.0.14 https://review.rdoproject.org/r/9055 15:03:42 Next week we will be looking at Newton RDO bugs during office hour. 15:04:09 #info next week [05-09-2017] Newton RDO Bugs Training 15:07:04 chandankumar: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/RDO-Pike-New-Packages 15:07:27 Christopher Brown proposed openstack/horizon-distgit rpm-master: Removed BuildRequires/Requires: python-coverage from .spec https://review.rdoproject.org/r/8464 15:08:06 rbowen, NB bugs in the RDO- trackers might not be new pkg reviews, but most are 15:08:14 it could be any release blocking issue 15:08:22 or just version update 15:08:50 tracker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=RDO-QUEENS created 15:10:01 excellent :) 15:11:24 hello folks! regarding to this: https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/9051/4 can I leave pike there? 15:11:42 ykarel: do you want to include your package reviews here https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/RDO-Pike-New-Packages 15:11:44 ? 15:12:07 apevec: So, perhaps I could say, the following packages were added or upgraded? 15:12:11 apevec: glareclient was reviewed in time, glare was delayed due to mistake 15:12:15 Oh. Someone is annotating right now. Awesome. 15:14:52 Mike Fedosin proposed rdoinfo master: Remove under-review tag for glare and glareclient https://review.rdoproject.org/r/9051 15:15:33 number80: we added shade in this release na? 15:15:38 mfedosin, number80 - ok then Pike is fine 15:15:51 but ocata probably not 15:16:01 apevec: I agree, way too late 15:16:08 chandankumar: yep 15:16:22 apevec: deal, I'll remove ocata 15:17:07 jpena: dmsimard EmilienM please have a look if we missed any package we added during Pike cycle https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/RDO-Pike-New-Packages 15:17:44 Mike Fedosin proposed rdoinfo master: Remove under-review tag for glare and glareclient https://review.rdoproject.org/r/9051 15:19:10 rbowen: number80 can we group the pike package list based on type like: openstack projects, libraries, tempest-plugins, puppet-modules 15:19:13 ? 15:19:44 That would indeed make it easier to follow than just a long list. 15:22:52 rbowen: done, if i missed other will update it 15:23:06 dmsimard: is Ara also packaged in this release na? 15:23:17 chandankumar: nope. 15:23:26 chandankumar: maybe in queens. 15:23:33 dmsimard: ack, thanks :-) 15:23:54 The fedora packaging is done, just need to tweak it a bit. Unfortunately ARA can't be in EPEL7 so it needs to find a SIG to adopt it :) 15:23:57 chandankumar: The top list is ... Python Libraries? 15:24:40 pradk: panko is added in Pike release in RDO na? 15:25:01 Christopher Brown proposed openstack/horizon-distgit rpm-master: Removed BuildRequires/Requires: python-coverage from .spec https://review.rdoproject.org/r/8464 15:25:38 number80: we have packaged some dashboards also na in this release? 15:25:56 Yeah 15:26:30 rbowen: i think we can cross verify this on RDO list? may be we have missed some packages 15:27:16 number80: what about new packages added for tripleo-ui? 15:27:19 Yes, will do. I was waiting for the edits to slow down. Looks like we've got lots of participation here. :-) 15:27:35 nodejs ones 15:27:37 I've added the ones that I found on rdoinfo 15:28:37 jpich: jrist please add the packages added from tripleo-ui deps side during pike release in RDO https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/RDO-Pike-New-Packages 15:28:55 hmm 15:29:06 chandankumar: is there a quick/easy way to do that? I'm not sure tbh 15:29:42 jrist: currently we are greping it from rdoinfo or from this list https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1427510 15:29:43 bugzilla.redhat.com bug 1427510 in distribution "Tracker: Blockers and Review requests for new RDO Pike packages" [Unspecified,New] - Assigned to apevec 15:29:55 Was there a blocker bugzilla bug for Pike ? 15:30:03 ah, yeah that 15:30:10 RDO-PIKE always :) 15:30:23 trown proposed config master: Upload images from one periodic ovb job for each release https://review.rdoproject.org/r/9057 15:30:37 I could bring up my repository version tracker thing 15:30:43 that number80 hated :D 15:30:55 * dmsimard mumbles verwatch mumbles 15:31:17 I don't hate, just say that it was not fitting all our needs 15:31:20 #info RDO Pike New package list created https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/RDO-Pike-New-Packages 15:31:24 and times up 15:31:28 #endmeeting