15:01:04 #startmeeting RDO meeting - 2019-09-04 15:01:04 Meeting started Wed Sep 4 15:01:04 2019 UTC. 15:01:04 This meeting is logged and archived in a public location. 15:01:04 The chair is ykarel. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 15:01:04 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 15:01:04 The meeting name has been set to 'rdo_meeting_-_2019-09-04' 15:01:05 Meeting started Wed Sep 4 15:01:04 2019 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is ykarel. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 15:01:06 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 15:01:08 The meeting name has been set to 'rdo_meeting___2019_09_04' 15:01:19 ٩( ᐛ )و 15:01:26 o/ 15:01:28 please add topic to agenda https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/RDO-Meeting 15:01:33 #chair jpena PagliaccisCloud 15:01:33 Current chairs: PagliaccisCloud jpena ykarel 15:01:34 Current chairs: PagliaccisCloud jpena ykarel 15:01:41 Rafael Folco proposed rdo-infra/ci-config master: [WIP] Staging promoter provisioning https://review.rdoproject.org/r/21909 15:04:09 User marios proposed rdo-infra/ci-config master: WIP D N M create and push container manifest with ppc and amd64 https://review.rdoproject.org/r/22002 15:05:18 Ok let's start with known topics 15:05:28 [ssbarnea, jpena]: Proposed adding ansible 2.8 as default version to base job. Any concerns? Workaround availabel as anyone can define ansible-version: 2.7 if they want or need. - https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/21996/ 15:05:45 #topic Proposed adding ansible 2.8 as default version to base job. Any concerns? 15:05:46 zbr: ^^ 15:06:34 jpena: based on my tests we should have no concerns. anyone of different ideas? 15:06:50 zbr, can u share what tests u did here also 15:06:58 considering that we do have a documented workaround it should be very easy to patch, after. 15:07:40 I created some reviews to test common jobs: https://review.rdoproject.org/r/21997, https://review.rdoproject.org/r/21998, https://review.rdoproject.org/r/22000, https://review.rdoproject.org/r/22001 15:07:54 all worked fine, I haven't found any obvious issue 15:08:08 * ykarel looks 15:08:56 Ansible Version: 2.8.3 15:09:22 ykarel: ci testing was limted to ovb but i run locally with 2.8 15:09:45 jpena, zbr isn't rhel8 job tested somewhere, as the patch specifically mentions rhel8 and python detection 15:09:59 yes, see https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/21918/ 15:10:08 * ykarel looks 15:10:12 you see rhel-8 there 15:11:09 zbr, ack, but i guess ansible_python_interpreter is set somewher in those jobs 15:11:30 i think u need to test without setting it, /me need to look more to those job defs 15:11:35 ykarel: i can vet that 2.8 can properly detect python 15:11:55 sshnaidm|ruck: ^ maybe you can confirm that too? 15:12:21 i know because I used 2.8 locally since it was released, this being its major "selling point" 15:14:55 zbr, i think it works as i remember overcloud deploy in rhel8 runs with ansible 2.8 only and there is no python_interpreter set 15:15:11 in fact that change was already workflowed few days ago but it failed to merge for random issues, 7 rechecks so far and still counting:D 15:15:35 hard luck :( 15:15:54 testing here w/o interpreter set: https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/21892/ 15:15:59 ykarel, zbr ^ 15:16:08 sshnaidm|ruck, ack 15:17:00 ok so we agree to move zuul base jobs to ansible 2.8 once testing finishes 15:17:28 unless and until someone objects 15:18:07 fwiw, upstream zuul is using 2.8 as a default, and we have not found any issues 15:18:20 ok good news 15:18:43 anything else to discuss with this topic, or we shall move to next 15:18:55 let's move on 15:19:19 ack 15:19:31 #topic [ykarel]: CentOS8 and RDO Train 15:19:34 it's me 15:19:46 so couple of info 15:19:49 #info CentOS8 RC Work is completed as per https://wiki.centos.org/About/Building_8, but we still don't have any ETA for it's release. 15:20:01 #info If it's released sooner we can start RDO preparation for CentOS8 and get Train released with CentOS8, if it's not released sooner it will be very difficult to get Train released with CentOS8. For now we have started with train preparation with CentOS7 only 15:21:05 so in short we don't have CentOS8 bit's ready for us to move RDO Train to it, so we need to wait 15:22:09 ok, it was just for info, let's move to next topic 15:22:21 i will update here once we have some more news 15:22:26 #topic Train release preparation update 15:23:01 centos7-train bootstrap has started 15:23:06 jpena, would u like to update ^^ 15:23:11 yep 15:23:32 So we have started the centos7-train bootstrap process. For now, you can see its status at https://trunk.rdoproject.org/centos7-train-bootstrap/report.html 15:23:51 we will need some more passes, the first one failed when stestr (a dependency) required cliff (an RDO Trunk package) 15:24:17 re centos8: why we do not get access to a RC build? Why we have to wait like everyone else for a "release"? Asking because having a pre-release would allow to spot missing bits and fix them before the release. 15:24:17 once that is fixed, I expect the builder to be in good shape by the end of the week, and we'll switch the URL to the usual one 15:25:33 jpena, nice 15:25:54 zbr|out, re. centos8 we have asked for RC images, and waiting for response from rbowen 15:26:27 yes if we have RC builds we can start preparation, but would need a release to get Train released over it 15:26:55 in any case, we have a ton of dependencies to build, and also depend on other SIGs (Ceph, Virt...) 15:27:12 yup that's also true :( 15:28:06 and regarding Train preparation, one more update 15:28:12 #info non clients libraries are being released upstream this week, RDO prep started, status being tracked at https://review.rdoproject.org/etherpad/p/train-release-preparation 15:30:37 any queries on it, else we move to open floor 15:31:53 #topic chair for next meeting 15:31:58 any volunteer? 15:32:25 I'll take it 15:32:36 Thanks 15:32:42 #action jpena to chair next week 15:32:57 #topic open floor 15:33:11 feel free to bring any topic now 15:34:16 Rafael Folco proposed rdo-infra/ci-config master: promotion staging zuul job https://review.rdoproject.org/r/21873 15:34:50 ykarel: since it's a little quiet, can I point at your patch to restore ppc container builds? https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/22083/ 15:35:15 reviews appreciated, thanks if you already have 15:35:35 mjturek, yes let's wait for zuul, then we can get it merged 15:35:47 fair enough! :) 15:37:43 Zoltan Caplovic created rdo-infra/rdo-infra-playbooks master: Playbook for rcm-registry (rhos-rcn tenant) https://review.rdoproject.org/r/22085 15:41:10 ok any other topic, or we close and everyone gets 20 minutes back 15:41:15 ? 15:41:48 * jpena votes for the 20 minutes 15:42:29 * ykarel don't see any objection to vote, so let's close 15:42:33 #endmeeting