23:14:20 #startmeeting 23:14:20 Meeting started Thu Jul 8 23:14:20 2010 UTC. The chair is sdziallas. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 23:14:20 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 23:14:30 #chair Jefro sdziallas 23:14:30 Current chairs: Jefro sdziallas 23:14:40 #topic Education Summit at LinuxCon 23:14:49 thanks sdziallas - what a nice comfy chair LOL 23:15:14 LOL! 23:15:30 we can make this fairly quick. we have several confirmed speakers and a few options for a schedule at http://teachingopensource.org/index.php/LinuxCon_2010/Schedule 23:15:42 * sdziallas nods, looks again 23:15:48 * paulproteus looks too 23:16:38 Looks like 8 speakers, for which I suggest option #2 if we want to lock it down now. Or we could keep it open to try to get one more. 23:17:15 I'd probably argue for #2 too, unless we get more folks. 23:17:17 Are break-out rooms possible? 23:17:38 I wonder if we can try to do #3 but take the speaker 6 slot and make it a 1.5h unconference? 23:17:40 only if we want to forego one of the sessions, I think 23:17:51 paulproteus: ok, back 23:17:52 * mchua reads up 23:17:57 hotel wifi sucks outside 23:18:16 Oh, sorry! Cool, I'll wait 'till you're cone. 23:18:17 er, done. 23:18:23 * mchua has to start up with quaid anyhoo 23:18:31 I'll look back here once in a while to see if y'all are finished. 23:18:37 mchua start up... cooking something awesome for dinner? ;) 23:18:40 I want to get really good audience participation, if possible. 23:18:54 Jefro: nah, out by the pool of my hotel, Karsten's kids wanted to swim 23:19:00 paulproteus: we need an audience that is willing to pay a $400 price tag 23:19:10 Jefro: quaid and I need to work on our own oscon talk ;) 23:19:24 paulproteus I agree, audience participation is key. one of our original plans was for half of the day to be unconf. 23:20:10 I nabbed zonker (Joe Brockmeier) early on as a key speaker, as he has a lot of experience, but he may be willing to take a back seat if we wanted to convert part of the day to roundtable. 23:20:27 I'm not sure we will get enough participants to warrant multiple breakout sessions, but a single roundtable might be very stimulating 23:20:39 Yeah, that's what I'm thinking. 23:20:50 Plus then the audience will think, "Man, what a cool group of attendees this was." 23:21:02 mchua that sounds so awesome, our pool is full of frogs 23:21:21 Maybe it'd make sense to attempt to reach out to channels (if they exist, I've no idea, but registration fee goes up on Jul 15) to get a couple of teachers / students in? 23:21:37 I'll talk to Joe. Also, within the next month any one of the 8 folks could also back out - happens all the time. 23:22:09 sdziallas that's an excellent idea. we have both blogged on the subject, but our combined reach is somewhat limited. 23:22:29 I... am not entirely sure where to start that, though. 23:23:10 my thinking on attendees is that no one is likely to make that trip from outside the area specifically to go to our mini-summit. I think our best ROI is to concentrate on the union of these two sets: Boston-area folks, and people already attending or planning to attend LinuxCon 23:23:21 Yup, agreed! 23:23:48 Jefro/sdziallas: Maybe mako or other Boston area people have leads for prospectives for Boston-area people? 23:23:55 I have tweeted about the summit on and off and always attached #LinuxCon, but perhaps we need a separate hashtag as well, and a more organized campaign 23:24:18 mchua: you? ;) 23:24:19 paulproteus : that sounds great! I don't know too many Boston area folks these days. 23:24:26 mako/laptop.org peeps/MIT people/etc. 23:24:44 mchua is probably busy ordering daquiris by the pool mmmmm 23:24:47 You could start by joining #acetarium on OFTC (tell them I sent you) and talking to people there, since that's a bunch of friendly Boston-area people. 23:24:51 I emailed the summit reminders to IAEP, but... mhm. 23:25:08 ok, that sounds good 23:25:11 (actually, it was just one) 23:26:16 * mchua looks up 23:26:24 sdziallas: you know all the boston-area profs I do, more or less 23:26:31 all my profs are Olin profs 23:26:47 mchua: I emailed two of them, but one sent a regret note and the other one is afk until Jul 12. 23:27:53 * Jefro thinks #acetarium is his kind of people, on joining IRC the first message across: "Don't blame me when the biotechnosingularity leaves you behind." 23:33:21 sdziallas: did you hit mark chang? 23:33:27 sdziallas: and sandeep chandiramandi? 23:33:34 * mchua makes sure she spelled that name right 23:33:48 mchua: I didn't. 23:34:14 wait, sanjoy mahajan 23:34:20 mhm? 23:34:24 sdziallas: sanjoy, not sandeep... I'm mixing people up 23:34:27 sandeep == olpc 23:34:32 sanjoy == mit --> olin (visiting) 23:34:39 Ah, okay. 23:34:46 sdziallas: sanjoy is the textbook guy, my humanities capstone advisor 23:34:53 Oh, Sanjoy's visiting Olin? Neat. 23:35:05 paulproteus: I am *PSYCHED* 23:35:20 mchua: :) 23:36:25 paulproteus: wait, you know him? 23:36:34 #action sdziallas to email mark chang and sanjoy mahajan 23:37:02 mchua: can haz email address plz (or is sanjoy also on the usual list)? 23:37:54 sdziallas: uh, umm... 23:37:56 sdziallas: http://mit.edu/sanjoy/www/ 23:38:00 send me email link at bottom of that 23:38:20 mchua: thx 23:39:12 alright, anything else we should discuss? Jefro, do we want to defer the call about the schedule until we know more about attendance or just make a call now? 23:39:26 (I don't want to block the channel here with the meeting.) 23:39:36 LOL - I forgot we had a meeting going on 23:39:46 Jefro: :) 23:39:58 I say we punt for a few days to consider whether to set up a roundtable, as paulproteus suggests 23:40:07 sounds good to me. 23:40:09 I suggest just doing it! 23:40:14 What's there to wait on? 23:40:46 I'm not so sure if it makes sense to go for a roundtable when there's just us speakers :D 23:40:53 paulproteus :) timing, for one. we are up to 8 hrs already with 8 speakers, and adding a roundtable means adding to the schedule. don't like to go longer than 6pm. 23:41:01 (I mean we could have *that* roundtable over lunch.) 23:41:18 Secretly I wouldn't mind if it's just us speakers (-; 23:41:21 sdziallas absolutely, and that is something to consider. a roundtable over a (provided) lunch could be very positive. 23:41:36 all we need now is a sponsor for lunch 23:41:50 Jefro: you mean: "provided": *hint* *hint* :) 23:42:18 yep, absolutely :) catered lobstah rols 23:42:25 LOL! 23:42:36 but we won't be able to get one until we can accurately gauge how many people will be there 23:42:45 #idea Jefro wants to get catered lobstah rols :D 23:43:04 * sdziallas nods. yup, true! 23:43:23 heck yeah. a bit expensive at $18 apiece, but there are several good places within walking distance, and as organizer I'd be happy to nip out and pick up an order. 23:43:57 LOL :) I'll keep that idea in the meeting logs then 23:44:02 * Jefro did some late-night research on important conference things, like how many lobstah shacks are 3 blocks or less from the Renaissance Hotel 23:44:08 excellent 23:44:26 hah, that's cool! 23:44:37 even if it is just sandwiches, we'll still need a sponsor. let's do some campaigning first for participants and see how we do. 23:44:47 * sdziallas nods. 23:45:04 #agreed get participants first, but try to find a sponsor for lunch 23:45:50 sounds good 23:46:07 any remaining issues to discuss today? 23:46:13 * sdziallas has none 23:46:26 let's make sure to get paulproteus' ideas in as well 23:46:34 #idea breakout/roundtable session 23:46:41 :) 23:46:50 Jefro: you do have such a cool chair :P 23:47:25 LOL the rocket-powered cushions and nuclear-chilled drink holder cost extra 23:47:42 :D 23:48:08 I think we are adjourned for now 23:48:14 okeydokey, let me end this then. 23:48:17 3 23:48:17 2 23:48:18 1 23:48:20 #endmeeting