#fedora-bugzappers: Fedora 13 Alpha blocker bug review meeting #1
Meeting started by adamw at 16:05:34 UTC
(full logs).
Meeting summary
-
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&field0-0-0=blocked&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=MODIFIED&bug_status=ON_DEV&bug_status=ON_QA&bug_status=VERIFIED&bug_status=RELEASE_PENDING&bug_status=POST&type0-0-0=substring&value0-0-0=%20538273&product=Fedora&classification=Fedora
(adamw,
16:06:33)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=557386 (adamw, 16:07:25)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=557386 (adamw, 16:09:25)
- 557386 is agreed to remain a blocker (and
release criterion will be added for abrt being broken), bug status
is waiting for abrt team to confirm the fix provided by kernel
team (adamw,
16:20:20)
- late-breaking news: jmoskovc confirms the
557386 change is what abrt team needs to make abrt work again
(adamw,
16:22:40)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=559290 (adamw, 16:22:46)
- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Blocker_Bug_FAQ#What_about_hardware_and_local_configuration_dependent_issues.3F
(jlaska,
16:34:42)
- AGREED: 559290 drops
to Beta blocker, assign to LVM team for action (adamw,
16:36:52)
- ACTION: jlaska to
update 559290 and assign to LVM team (adamw,
16:37:03)
- pjones thinks this is a case of incorrect
allocation, not actual genuine usage of large amounts of RAM
(adamw,
16:37:19)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=560334 (adamw, 16:38:19)
- AGREED: 560334 looks
to be resolved: reporter cannot reproduce and neither can
dlehman (adamw,
16:41:25)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=562209 (adamw, 16:43:00)
- AGREED: 562209 is a
blocker, breaks 'installer must run from boot.iso' criterion. action
is on anaconda team (adamw,
16:47:04)
- (adamw, 16:48:05)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=557928 (adamw, 16:48:13)
- AGREED: 557928 is not
an alpha blocker, we will punt to beta for now. anaconda team is
looking at it (adamw,
16:55:57)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=560477 (adamw, 16:56:33)
- AGREED: 560477 is a
blocker (breaks 'rescue mode most start successfully'), patch is
written but not committed (adamw,
17:03:52)
- ACTION: pjones to
push patch to fix 560477 (adamw,
17:04:03)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=557323 (adamw, 17:04:35)
- http://git.fedorahosted.org/git/?p=anaconda.git;a=commit;h=8a87de5f8573e4d800c02b99c09762e44f5666cd
(jlaska,
17:10:25)
- AGREED: 557323 is
probably fixed, according to anaconda team: will be closed
(adamw,
17:12:50)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=559679 (adamw, 17:13:40)
- AGREED: 559679 is
fixed, the fixed selinux-policy hit rawhide already; closing
(adamw,
17:15:47)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=560017 (adamw, 17:16:14)
- AGREED: 560017 is a
blocker as per comment #3, it should be fixed, qa will
confirm (adamw,
17:20:06)
- ACTION: jlaska to
confirm fix for 560017 (adamw,
17:20:11)
- checking beta and final blocker bugs for any that should be promoted (adamw, 17:21:32)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=558678
- I filed this and set it to beta blocker (adamw,
17:21:45)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523646
seems icky (adamw,
17:28:24)
- open floor (adamw, 17:40:58)
Meeting ended at 17:42:48 UTC
(full logs).
Action items
- jlaska to update 559290 and assign to LVM team
- pjones to push patch to fix 560477
- jlaska to confirm fix for 560017
Action items, by person
- jlaska
- jlaska to update 559290 and assign to LVM team
- jlaska to confirm fix for 560017
- pjones
- pjones to push patch to fix 560477
People present (lines said)
- adamw (166)
- jlaska (128)
- pjones (22)
- dlehman (18)
- Oxf13 (6)
- drago01 (4)
- zodbot (3)
- Tech33 (1)
- stickster (1)
- warren (1)
Generated by MeetBot 0.1.4.