=================================================================
#fedora-bugzappers: Fedora 13 Alpha blocker bug review meeting #1
=================================================================


Meeting started by adamw at 16:05:34 UTC. The full logs are available at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-bugzappers/2010-02-05/alphablocker1.2010-02-05-16.05.log.html
.



Meeting summary
---------------
* LINK:
  https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&field0-0-0=blocked&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=MODIFIED&bug_status=ON_DEV&bug_status=ON_QA&bug_status=VERIFIED&bug_status=RELEASE_PENDING&bug_status=POST&type0-0-0=substring&value0-0-0=%20538273&product=Fedora&classification=Fedora
  (adamw, 16:06:33)
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=557386  (adamw, 16:07:25)

* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=557386  (adamw, 16:09:25)
  * 557386 is agreed to remain a blocker (and release criterion will be
    added for abrt being broken), bug status is waiting for abrt team to
    confirm the fix provided by kernel team  (adamw, 16:20:20)
  * late-breaking news: jmoskovc confirms the 557386 change is what abrt
    team needs to make abrt work again  (adamw, 16:22:40)

* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=559290  (adamw, 16:22:46)
  * LINK:
    https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Blocker_Bug_FAQ#What_about_hardware_and_local_configuration_dependent_issues.3F
    (jlaska, 16:34:42)
  * AGREED: 559290 drops to Beta blocker, assign to LVM team for action
    (adamw, 16:36:52)
  * ACTION: jlaska to update 559290 and assign to LVM team  (adamw,
    16:37:03)
  * pjones thinks this is a case of incorrect allocation, not actual
    genuine usage of large amounts of RAM  (adamw, 16:37:19)

* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=560334  (adamw, 16:38:19)
  * AGREED: 560334 looks to be resolved: reporter cannot reproduce and
    neither can dlehman  (adamw, 16:41:25)

* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=562209  (adamw, 16:43:00)
  * AGREED: 562209 is a blocker, breaks 'installer must run from
    boot.iso' criterion. action is on anaconda team  (adamw, 16:47:04)

*   (adamw, 16:48:05)

* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=557928  (adamw, 16:48:13)
  * AGREED: 557928 is not an alpha blocker, we will punt to beta for
    now. anaconda team is looking at it  (adamw, 16:55:57)

* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=560477  (adamw, 16:56:33)
  * AGREED: 560477 is a blocker (breaks 'rescue mode most start
    successfully'), patch is written but not committed  (adamw,
    17:03:52)
  * ACTION: pjones to push patch to fix 560477  (adamw, 17:04:03)

* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=557323  (adamw, 17:04:35)
  * LINK:
    http://git.fedorahosted.org/git/?p=anaconda.git;a=commit;h=8a87de5f8573e4d800c02b99c09762e44f5666cd
    (jlaska, 17:10:25)
  * AGREED: 557323 is probably fixed, according to anaconda team: will
    be closed  (adamw, 17:12:50)

* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=559679  (adamw, 17:13:40)
  * AGREED: 559679 is fixed, the fixed selinux-policy hit rawhide
    already; closing  (adamw, 17:15:47)

* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=560017  (adamw, 17:16:14)
  * AGREED: 560017 is a blocker as per comment #3, it should be fixed,
    qa will confirm  (adamw, 17:20:06)
  * ACTION: jlaska to confirm fix for 560017  (adamw, 17:20:11)

* checking beta and final blocker bugs for any that should be promoted
  (adamw, 17:21:32)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=558678 - I filed
    this and set it to beta blocker  (adamw, 17:21:45)
  * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=523646 seems icky
    (adamw, 17:28:24)

* open floor  (adamw, 17:40:58)

Meeting ended at 17:42:48 UTC.




Action Items
------------
* jlaska to update 559290 and assign to LVM team
* pjones to push patch to fix 560477
* jlaska to confirm fix for 560017




Action Items, by person
-----------------------
* jlaska
  * jlaska to update 559290 and assign to LVM team
  * jlaska to confirm fix for 560017
* pjones
  * pjones to push patch to fix 560477
* **UNASSIGNED**
  * (none)




People Present (lines said)
---------------------------
* adamw (166)
* jlaska (128)
* pjones (22)
* dlehman (18)
* Oxf13 (6)
* drago01 (4)
* zodbot (3)
* Tech33 (1)
* stickster (1)
* warren (1)




Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4

.. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot