15:08:12 #startmeeting Ansible Core Meeting 15:08:12 Meeting started Tue Apr 12 15:08:12 2016 UTC. The chair is abadger1999. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 15:08:12 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 15:08:12 The meeting name has been set to 'ansible_core_meeting' 15:09:12 jimi|ansible, gregdek, nitzmahone, rbergeron, newtMcKerr, Qalthos, etc.. Who all's here? 15:09:25 * gregdek hullos 15:09:45 * bcoca waves 15:09:50 #chair bcoca gregdek 15:09:50 Current chairs: abadger1999 bcoca gregdek 15:10:13 resmo: I know you were interested in this one yesterday. 15:11:50 Do we have a particular/standing agenda? 15:12:12 * gregdek notes that this is probably a good meeting to review what's in ansible/proposals... 15:12:17 morning guys 15:12:27 gregdek: yes, start an agenda 15:12:42 kamsz: hi 15:12:59 I've notified #ansible and #ansible-devel that meeting has started. 15:13:26 gregdek: Sounds like a good idea -- would you like to start us off? 15:13:56 You're chaired so go ahead and take the floor. 15:14:05 LOL 15:14:24 It's my meeting now, is it? :) 15:14:35 first point of meeting, set correct dates times? 15:14:51 seems like this time was not intended for today but for thrusday, today we have another at 3pm 15:15:16 Right. 15:15:17 Alright, that works for me. 15:15:20 https://github.com/ansible/community/blob/master/MEETINGS.md 15:15:38 I believe the times there are correct, yes? 15:15:45 1900 UTC == 1500 EDT? 15:15:49 For Tuesday? 15:15:50 times are correct, but this is not the right time 15:15:53 https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/ansible-project/fUrfZGgQ13I 15:15:55 Okeydoke. 15:15:58 3pm EST Tue 15:16:02 THEN I GUESS WE'RE ADJOURNED! 15:16:07 :-) 15:16:09 ^ that is what i went off of 15:16:26 1400 UTC <== 11am EST 15:16:55 my clock says it is 1516 UTC 15:17:14 is my clock broken oh god help 15:17:31 1500EST, not UTC :) 15:17:31 lol 15:17:33 edt/est problem? 15:17:43 TIMEZONES!!!! 15:17:44 Right. The 1400 meeting is me doing triage of old issues -- which I've been doing in the background. I'll be removing that meeting, since it's really just a cleanup task, no meeting required for it. 15:17:56 dangit, the meeting starts in 3 hours and 43 minutes 15:18:00 confusgion 15:18:05 Right. 15:18:11 #topic Open floor 15:18:13 so ... remove the meeting from the MEETINGS? 15:18:15 i put EST/EDT in the announcement for a reason... 15:18:17 Just did. 15:18:18 timezones are stupid everything in UTC forever 15:18:22 Anyone who showed up want to talk about something or shall we close down and meet back here in a little under 4 hours? 15:18:28 daemoniz: plus all the ones 15:18:32 ♥ 15:18:33 bah, lrn2timezone 15:18:33 I have 3 PRs that I would like to discuss; actually 1 to discuss and 2 to get merged :) 15:18:39 (unless it's me that has it wrong) 15:18:58 * jimi|ansible goes back to trying to announce 2.0.2 rc4... 15:19:02 in 4h is not a good time for me (Europe) 15:19:03 he 15:19:17 robinroth: Okay, go ahead... I can look at at least one of them now and we can get to the other later today or on thu. 15:19:22 https://github.com/ansible/ansible-modules-core/pull/3254 15:19:27 git depth 15:19:48 #topic git depth PR: https://github.com/ansible/ansible-modules-core/pull/3254 15:20:08 hi 15:20:11 robinroth: for future reference, the thursday meeting will be at this time 15:20:18 * gregdek wanders afk, ping if needed 15:21:19 what does depth currently do then? 15:22:06 currently the initial clone respects depth (pull only last N commits), but following updates don't and fetch the full history 15:22:16 the bug for this is https://github.com/ansible/ansible/issues/14954 15:22:47 depth is also used in ansible-pull to only fetch the last commit, but this bugs breaks this on the second run 15:24:53 hmm 15:28:12 resmo: any concern? 15:29:30 robinroth: I thought there might be a closed bug that had to do with that but I'm not sure... I only see an open bug atm: https://github.com/ansible/ansible-modules-core/issues/527 15:29:58 open bug -- so I have no idea if it would be affected by changes to that code. 15:30:40 robinroth: Do you have integration tests for this? We probably want those so that if we do further work on tagging we don't cause this to regress. 15:30:45 robinroth: no 15:31:38 abadger1999: for the depth option there are no tests yet, I can add those and also have a look at the issue you mentioned 15:32:38 robinroth: Cool. If you make some integration tests I think this would be good to merge. 15:32:53 #3254 LGTM 15:33:13 We'll just need to be watchful for breakage in the way people use tags when we do. 15:33:39 sooo... are we having this meeting twice today then? 15:33:40 abadger1999: sure, we need integration tests for sure 15:33:49 #chairs 15:33:55 #chair 15:34:00 jimi|ansible: I am but no need for you to. 15:34:37 I jsut didn't want to leave contributors who showed up because I posted to the irc channel high and dry. 15:34:39 jimi|ansible: this is a test run? 15:34:52 #chair gundalow resmo 15:34:52 Current chairs: abadger1999 bcoca gregdek gundalow resmo 15:35:17 ALL THE CHAIRS! 15:35:25 abadger1999: Thanks, I wanted to make sure that we added any links in 15:35:37 im actually using a bench ... 15:36:15 robinroth: Cool. I think there's time to look at one more and then we could look at your others on Thursday. 15:36:40 custom ismount function in mount module: https://github.com/ansible/ansible-modules-core/pull/2737 15:36:55 #topic Custom ismount function https://github.com/ansible/ansible-modules-core/pull/2737 15:36:59 #action robinroth to see if https://github.com/ansible/ansible-modules-core/pull/3254 effects https://github.com/ansible/ansible-modules-core/issues/527 is so add tests 15:37:37 this is an issue in upstream python, that the ismount function unnecessarily fails with permission issues 15:38:03 I submitted a patch to python, but they take forever to integrate and the fix should also be there for older versions 15:38:34 the module_utils code is in 2.0.1 already, but it's not used, this is what this PR wants to change 15:38:39 just want to make sure we're doing it twice if we do it, since we advertised the later time, i have no objection to it 15:38:51 well, we did merge the module_utils part, this does not look wrong 15:39:18 This looks good to me. 15:39:19 jimi|ansible: I'll be available at the correct time. I agree it needs to be twice today 15:39:27 Do we want to cherry-pick it to stable-2.0 as well? 15:39:50 abadger1999: for possible 2.0.3, yes, but need to wait for 2.0.2 to be out 15:40:02 k . 15:40:37 Just need to remember to cherry-pick change to ansible *and* ansible-modules-core 15:41:06 gundalow: From my comments (a long time ago now...) I think the module_utils change is already cherry-picked 15:41:35 yep, module_utils/ismount.py is there already. 15:41:56 cool 15:42:18 #action abadger1999 to merge this to devel now. Will cherry-pick to stable-2.0 once 2.0.2 is out the door. 15:42:45 robinroth: If I should forget to cherry-pick, don't hesitate to ping me in #ansible-devel to remind me :-) 15:43:07 abadger1999: sure 15:43:11 Thanks. 15:43:36 #topic Meeting end 15:43:56 Any burning comments that people have before we end? 15:44:16 there is this third PR: https://github.com/ansible/ansible/pull/15221 15:44:16 but I guess it can wait 15:44:25 thanks for the comments/merge/... 15:44:32 Is there a short description about the purpose of this meeting verses new modules? 15:44:37 Yeah - if it's okay to wait for Thursday, we'll get to it then. 15:45:18 Is this the place to push up requests that require the Core Team's input? 15:45:23 gundalow: I think new modules are okay here if we have nothing else but we should concentrate first on: 15:45:47 issues and PRs that people who are willing to come to the meeting want to present. 15:46:27 Old PRs that need attention from us (as opposed to from the submitter) 15:46:43 gundalow: Yes -- definitely the place for getting Core team input. 15:47:34 cool, I'll raise a PR to update https://github.com/ansible/community/blob/master/MEETINGS.md 15:47:49 Cool. 15:47:56 Alright see you all in a few hours. 15:47:59 #endmeeting