#ansible-meeting: Ansible Core Meeting

Meeting summary

1. 1. April's Agenda https://github.com/ansible/community/issues/159 (gundalow, 19:02:33)
   
   
2. Discuss extending the module "shipit" workflow to non-modules, such as: (gundalow, 19:05:59)
   1. https://github.com/ansible/community/issues/159#issuecomment-291567077 (gundalow, 19:06:09)
   2. https://github.com/ansible/ansibullbot/issues/437 (gundalow, 19:06:45)
   
   
3. Fix for wildcards inside of a path for fileglob lookup (gundalow, 19:09:47)
   1. New alternative fix from bcoca https://github.com/ansible/ansible/pull/23265 (gundalow, 19:10:17)
   
   
4. Proposal Proposal (gundalow, 19:12:14)
   1. https://github.com/ansible/proposals/pull/59 (gundalow, 19:14:59)
   2. ACTION: allanice001 to update the PR based on review comments (gundalow, 19:16:39)
   
   
5. How should Paths work (gundalow, 19:16:48)
   1. https://github.com/ansible/ansible/pull/22546 (gundalow, 19:16:58)
   2. not sure... (gundalow, 20:02:49)
   
   
6. Adding nested dictionary lookups (gundalow, 20:02:58)
   1. https://github.com/ansible/ansible/pull/9563 (gundalow, 20:03:06)
   2. https://github.com/ansible/community/issues/159#issuecomment-291569762 (gundalow, 20:03:12)
   3. ACTION: mattclay to update the PR with a template example and inquire if that works for the described use case (mattclay, 20:21:49)
   
   
7. 23242/ (gundalow, 20:22:13)
   
8. https://github.com/ansible/ansible/pull/23242 (gundalow, 20:22:31)
   1. https://github.com/ansible/ansible/pull/23242/files looks good, just need another set of eyes then it can be merged & cherrypicked (gundalow, 20:22:59)
   
   
9. https://github.com/ansible/ansible/pull/23242 (gundalow, 20:24:29)
   1. ignorethis (gundalow, 20:24:58)
   
   
10. Open Floor (gundalow, 20:30:10)

Action items

1. allanice001 to update the PR based on review comments
2. mattclay to update the PR with a template example and inquire if that works for the described use case

Action items, by person

1. allanice001
   1. allanice001 to update the PR based on review comments
2. mattclay
   1. mattclay to update the PR with a template example and inquire if that works for the described use case

People present (lines said)

1. gundalow (98)
2. bcoca (62)
3. abadger1999 (34)
4. allanice001 (25)
5. jtanner (22)
6. mattclay (14)
7. sivel (13)
8. nitzmahone (11)
9. robinro (5)
10. zodbot (5)
11. bjolivot_ (5)
12. alikins (2)
13. shertel (1)
14. ryansb (1)
15. Qalthos (0)
16. ganeshrn (0)
17. jimi|ansible (0)