15:02:07 #startmeeting Ansible Docs Working Group aka DaWGs 15:02:07 Meeting started Tue Apr 30 15:02:07 2019 UTC. 15:02:07 This meeting is logged and archived in a public location. 15:02:07 The chair is acozine. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 15:02:07 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 15:02:07 The meeting name has been set to 'ansible_docs_working_group_aka_dawgs' 15:02:17 who's around? 15:02:39 * alongchamps waves 15:02:46 #chair alongchamps 15:02:46 Current chairs: acozine alongchamps 15:03:27 samccann is out this week 15:04:08 gundalow dag decentral1se felixfontein Pilou shaps Xaroth you folks chiming in this week? 15:04:14 * gundalow waves 15:06:16 #chair gundalow 15:06:16 Current chairs: acozine alongchamps gundalow 15:06:34 I merged the docs-build speedup we discussed last week 15:06:35 Nothing from me 15:06:38 ah, nice 15:07:28 on the dev-docs side, I've got https://github.com/ansible/ansible/pull/55931 open - it incorporates work Pilou did months (years?) ago 15:08:10 open docs PRs have been steady at just under 75 this week: https://github.com/ansible/ansible/pulls?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Apr+is%3Aopen+label%3Adocs 15:08:36 I'd love to see folks "adopt" stale PRs to see if we can update-and-merge or close them 15:11:16 alongchamps: what are you up to? any PRs or issues to shepherd through the system? 15:11:29 nothing much on my side; just watching 15:14:22 well, this may be the shortest DaWGs meeting ever 15:14:43 oh, for anyone interested in AnsibleFest . . . 15:15:08 Call for Proposals is open: https://ansiblefest2019.eventpoint.com/cfp 15:15:34 folks who give talks get free conference registration 15:19:18 #topic random PRs 15:19:30 what do folks think about https://github.com/ansible/ansible/pull/55870? 15:21:06 is there a way to get `failed_when` to join multiple conditions with `OR`? 15:21:25 it seems like a reasonable use case to me 15:21:53 so this is one of those docs PRs that might spark a change to the code . . . 15:23:12 acozine: failed_when: x == y or z == a 15:23:27 #chair bcoca 15:23:27 Current chairs: acozine alongchamps bcoca gundalow 15:23:48 same with 'and', but 'and' is also 'implicit' when using a list 15:24:03 failed_when: [ x ==y, z == a] 15:24:15 the example looks like this: 15:24:30 https://www.irccloud.com/pastebin/fWYxATUs/failed_when%20example 15:25:31 if you wanted that to fail if either condition is met, what's the right syntax? 15:25:35 that is basically same as [ a, b] 15:25:39 both are 'lists' 15:25:54 ah, okay 15:26:06 failed_when: result.rc == 0 or "no such" not in results.stdout 15:26:32 lists are always 'imlpicit AND' there is not 'implicit OR' 15:26:37 you must be explicit 15:28:33 so I'll parade my ignorance here - the example you gave is NOT a list - what is it? It's not an array either - how would you describe it? 15:28:44 list == array 15:28:50 diff names, same thing 15:29:06 which example are you specifically reffering to? i gave several 15:29:22 heh, the `failed_when: result.rc == 0 or "no such" not in results.stdout` one 15:29:29 string 15:29:37 great, thanks 15:29:39 aka, not a list/array 15:29:50 heh, exactly 15:30:10 dict == map == hash == associative array (devs love to rename same stuff diff ways) 15:30:39 list == array == stack ~= queue/fifo/lifo (these are just lists with ordering rules) 15:31:07 awesome, I'll update that PR with more details 15:31:35 any other contenders for Next Random PR to Review? 15:35:06 Can anyone understand what's going on in this one? 15:35:08 https://github.com/ansible/ansible/pull/55796 15:36:13 it just looks wrong, but then I'm not sure what his playbook was trying to accomplish 15:38:53 it's a quiet day in docs-land 15:40:19 I'm going to call the meeting for today - feel free to add topics (PRs, issues, ideas, complaints, etc.) to the agenda for next week in a comment at the bottom of https://github.com/ansible/community/issues/389 15:40:31 thanks alongchamps gundalow bcoca! 15:40:50 #endmeeting