16:02:32 #startmeeting Ansible Network Working Group 16:02:32 Meeting started Wed Dec 4 16:02:32 2019 UTC. 16:02:32 This meeting is logged and archived in a public location. 16:02:32 The chair is Qalthos. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 16:02:32 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 16:02:32 The meeting name has been set to 'ansible_network_working_group' 16:03:14 #chair ganeshrn ikhan privateip GomathiselviS dmellado pabelanger 16:03:14 Current chairs: GomathiselviS Qalthos dmellado ganeshrn ikhan pabelanger privateip 16:03:51 o/ 16:03:56 sorry, was reading an email 16:04:45 #topic Core Updates 16:05:21 I believe we are in the process of preparing for 2.9 release, so if there are backports people are intersted in, please lets us know 16:06:08 Aside from that, 2.10 release is still on track. Now is the time to be working on your PRs, if you'd like to include something for it 16:06:33 that gives reviewers lots of time before rc phase 16:07:17 #info core development for 2.10, see https://github.com/ansible/community/wiki/Network%3A-2.10-Roadmap for details 16:07:41 #link https://github.com/ansible/community/labels/network is where the agenda is, so lets get started 16:08:18 #topic Meraki reviews 16:08:24 mrproper: this looks to be your topic 16:08:41 from the looks of it, 2 or 3 PRs were merged 16:08:45 #link https://github.com/ansible/ansible/pull/63712 16:08:57 is current open 16:09:11 Whoops, I didn't push the comment edit 16:09:27 ah, cool 16:09:52 okay, so looks like Qalthos is working on that. Seems straightforward 16:10:07 The third one is... different 16:11:05 I am not sure if we do something like that in other places 16:11:15 I know we have talked about it in the context of network interfaces, and delete 16:11:24 eg: delete is usually a foot cannon 16:12:23 this topic also seem familar for meraki, I think we've talked about it before 16:12:45 since mrproper isn't here at the moment, lets move to next topic and we can loop back at end if needed 16:13:18 #topic new asa_ogcontent module 16:13:30 #link https://github.com/ansible/ansible/pull/65248 16:13:43 I am unsure if OP is on IRC 16:14:14 Federico87_: 16:14:20 Hello! 16:14:25 Oh 16:14:32 for some reason tab missed that 16:15:01 So, I have add unit test as required by Qalthos 16:15:37 so, more a question for Qalthos and collections. Is there a point in time, were we want a new module to be a collection over ansible/ansible? 16:15:44 I cannot remember where things settled on that 16:16:43 I think the clearest advice we have is that things are moving to collections within the 2.10 cycle 16:16:56 You can get started now or you can wait until we make you 16:17:36 okay, that make sense 16:17:48 Federico87_: were you aware of that? 16:17:52 We're still accepting new module PRs for the time being, and I don't know when that is going to stop, but it will 16:18:18 no really, not sure what you are talking about. I am was out from ansible stuff for the past 4 months :) 16:19:01 Federico87_: so, longer term there modules / plugins / etc will be moved into collections 16:19:21 which means, that there is going to be some sort of migration processes away from ansible/ansible to new collections 16:19:26 based on grouping of content 16:19:32 My understanding is that there will be a community networking collection that things in ansible/ansible should easily transition into 16:19:37 so, we are still accepting new modules 16:19:58 but for 2.10, there is discussion of migration to new community network colleciton as Qalthos says 16:20:27 ook, I might need to do some reading about this. Since this module would be expected in 2.10...is it not good? sorry for the dummy question 16:20:49 It's fine here 16:20:51 no, I think we can look to merge it. Just that the home for it long term is going to be not ansible/ansible 16:21:01 we'll have migration process in play to deal with it 16:21:12 more a heads up, of new future to come 16:21:25 oook 16:22:05 You also have the option of creating your own collection so as to have greater control over your own content, if you want that 16:22:54 Ok, I need to dig out some docs and understand more about this collection. Regarding this PR/module, does it look ok to you? 16:23:33 I can review more closely, but having tests is usually good sign in my books 16:23:41 I haven't yet looked more closely at it 16:24:25 Federico87_: 2 sets of eyes on PR now, keep an eye out for movement on the PR 16:24:38 I'll try and review by tomorrow 16:25:12 As side note, this is something we use to extract object-group information on our custom django platform and has been running for a while. I have just put in ansible module format 16:25:12 :) 16:25:16 Thanks for that 16:25:31 ++ 16:25:37 #topic Open discussion 16:25:56 so, we don't have anything else on the agenda. So if people want to discuss anything else 16:26:34 only thing I have to share, is we are finally moving nxos testing into zuul 16:26:55 which is the last step of migrating away from DCI for all our testing needs 16:27:05 I am hoping to have most of that work finished by next week 16:27:05 Wooo! 16:27:20 pabelanger++ 16:27:20 Qalthos: Karma for pabelanger changed to 1 (for the current release cycle): https://badges.fedoraproject.org/tags/cookie/any 16:28:19 ...right, zodbot is here 16:30:22 okay, lets end early today 16:30:24 thanks everybody 16:30:27 #endmeeting