<@davide:cavalca.name>
16:00:57
!startmeeting CentOS Hyperscale SIG
<@meetbot:fedora.im>
16:00:59
Meeting started at 2024-08-28 16:00:57 UTC
<@meetbot:fedora.im>
16:00:59
The Meeting name is 'CentOS Hyperscale SIG'
<@davide:cavalca.name>
16:01:05
morning everyone
<@davide:cavalca.name>
16:01:07
!topic Roll call
<@rcolebaugh:matrix.org>
16:01:32
!hi
<@zodbot:fedora.im>
16:01:34
Raymond Colebaugh (rcolebaugh) - he / him / his
<@conan_kudo:matrix.org>
16:02:24
!hi
<@zodbot:fedora.im>
16:02:27
Neal Gompa (ngompa) - he / him / his
<@jonathanspw:fedora.im>
16:03:13
!hi
<@zodbot:fedora.im>
16:03:14
Jonathan Wright (jonathanspw)
<@salimma:fedora.im>
16:03:21
!hi
<@zodbot:fedora.im>
16:03:22
Michel Lind (salimma) - he / him / his
<@davide:cavalca.name>
16:04:22
let's get started
<@davide:cavalca.name>
16:04:23
!topic Followups
<@daandemeyer/:matrix.org>
16:04:30
!hi
<@zodbot:fedora.im>
16:04:32
Daan De Meyer (daandemeyer)
<@davide:cavalca.name>
16:04:45
let's see... we survived both flock and devconfus
<@davide:cavalca.name>
16:04:51
and the devconfus talks are up already
<@salimma:fedora.im>
16:04:54
somehow. yay
<@davide:cavalca.name>
16:04:57
still need to update our tracker page
<@davide:cavalca.name>
16:05:54
anybody else has followups?
<@davide:cavalca.name>
16:08:16
alright, let's move to
<@davide:cavalca.name>
16:08:21
!topic Announcements
<@davide:cavalca.name>
16:08:46
Matteo Croce: pushed an updated version of the rpm stack with CoW for c9s
<@davide:cavalca.name>
16:08:57
we're currently testing that internally at Meta
<@davide:cavalca.name>
16:09:16
as discussed at fosdem, the c10s one is waiting to see whether upstream ends up rebasing rpm or not
<@davide:cavalca.name>
16:09:50
also, while updating some home systems I realized our latest systemd release is not installable due to a conflict with grubby
<@davide:cavalca.name>
16:10:13
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/systemd/c/a9807c4486037e2a47bae8ae7fcf3fa265ebdaab?branch=rawhide should fix that, this still needs to get pulled into Hyperscale (and then we need to make a release)
<@daandemeyer/:matrix.org>
16:10:22
I'll add grubby to the systemd-releng mkosi config packages
<@daandemeyer/:matrix.org>
16:10:29
That should add coverage for that
<@davide:cavalca.name>
16:10:35
awesome, thanks
<@conan_kudo:matrix.org>
16:11:10
the flock talks are up too
<@davide:cavalca.name>
16:11:17
oh nice
<@conan_kudo:matrix.org>
16:11:32
they just went up
<@conan_kudo:matrix.org>
16:14:16
!link https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL0x39xti0_6757itYwFBHqaZRdIiF43jO
<@davide:cavalca.name>
16:14:22
the other thing I wanted to mention is that at flock we've started experimenting with a unified docs site for CentOS, and I did some cleanup of the Hyperscale docs to fix absolute links so they'd work fine as part of that
<@davide:cavalca.name>
16:14:35
https://docs-centos-org-centos-docs-5f8c3c51aa463473c5b967945c3cf462908.gitlab.io/centos-hyperscale-sig/ is what it looks like in there (temporary URL obviously)
<@conan_kudo:matrix.org>
16:14:37
!info Flock talks are up
<@conan_kudo:matrix.org>
16:16:12
is the idea that there's be a single index that people can look from?
<@davide:cavalca.name>
16:16:26
yes, and a global search
<@salimma:fedora.im>
16:16:38
nice
<@davide:cavalca.name>
16:16:47
join #centos-docs:fedora.im if you're interested in helping out with this
<@davide:cavalca.name>
16:17:12
the idea is that once the contributor guide is moved over this could replace docs.centos.org
<@davide:cavalca.name>
16:21:34
anything else for announcements?
<@salimma:fedora.im>
16:23:27
we're getting ethtool 6.10 in Hyperscale
<@salimma:fedora.im>
16:23:48
definitely for hs.el9, maybe for hs.el10 too if RHEL maintainer won't upgrade from 6.7
<@conan_kudo:matrix.org>
16:26:00
still troubleshooting the issues with kernel builds for c10s
<@conan_kudo:matrix.org>
16:29:29
pretty sure the problem has something to do with builders on rhel8 and libkcapi
<@salimma:fedora.im>
16:30:18
ouch - the builders are still on RHEL 8 :O
<@conan_kudo:matrix.org>
16:31:03
yeah, I'm not sure why the builders aren't upgraded to the latest rhel at least, if not latest centos stream
<@davide:cavalca.name>
16:36:17
next up
<@davide:cavalca.name>
16:36:18
!topic Tickets
<@davide:cavalca.name>
16:36:40
we should probably go over these and clean things up a bit when we have a moment
<@davide:cavalca.name>
16:37:04
but right now I don't think there's anything immediately actionable
<@davide:cavalca.name>
16:37:46
!topic Membership
<@davide:cavalca.name>
16:38:19
so https://pagure.io/centos-sig-hyperscale/sig/issue/163 has been open for 5 months now, and afaict the person mentioned there never actually joined any of the channels or introduced themselves
<@davide:cavalca.name>
16:39:02
I'd suggest closing this with a comment, as it seems a bit silly to bring it up every time (and they're obviously welcome to reopen it)
<@conan_kudo:matrix.org>
16:39:23
we should just close it
<@davide:cavalca.name>
16:40:02
any objections?
<@salimma:fedora.im>
16:41:41
no, this is getting ridiculous
<@salimma:fedora.im>
16:42:10
but that remidns me, the follow up is to also poll inactive people regularly and make sure people listed as members are still active, right?
<@davide:cavalca.name>
16:42:20
yes, we also need to do that
<@davide:cavalca.name>
16:42:33
well, come up with a process to do that first, announce it, and then do it
<@davide:cavalca.name>
16:42:57
I've just closed that ticket in the meantime
<@salimma:fedora.im>
16:43:03
I guess we should discuss that either now or at the next meeting
<@davide:cavalca.name>
16:43:37
https://sigs.centos.org/hyperscale/policies/governance/ says
<@davide:cavalca.name>
16:43:44
> We do expect SIG members to actively contribute or otherwise remain engaged with the project, and will initiate removal of stale members after six months of inactivity.
<@davide:cavalca.name>
16:44:07
so that's a start
<@conan_kudo:matrix.org>
16:44:58
we can probably just start doing it then
<@davide:cavalca.name>
16:45:15
we can, but I'd rather be nice about it
<@davide:cavalca.name>
16:45:28
easiest is probably to just email everyone and ask if they're still interested in being in the SIG
<@davide:cavalca.name>
16:45:49
I'd rather not be in the business of measuring whether what someone is doing counts as "engagement"
<@davide:cavalca.name>
16:46:51
also this page needs an update, it still references IRC and the wiki
<@salimma:fedora.im>
16:48:08
yeah, I think emailing every six months, then doing a reminder, before then purging should be fine
<@salimma:fedora.im>
16:48:42
so we probably should wordsmith it. basing it on the non-responsive maintainer policy or EPEL stalled request in Fedora might be reasonable?
<@davide:cavalca.name>
16:49:06
yeah, sounds good to me
<@davide:cavalca.name>
16:49:14
we can work on this async in the next couple of weeks
<@salimma:fedora.im>
16:49:43
yeah. I'll be away for the next meeting, but I can try putting up a PR before I leave next week
<@davide:cavalca.name>
16:50:06
oh right, I'll also be away for Plumbers
<@salimma:fedora.im>
16:50:10
!action Michel to draft the procedure for checking in with inactive members
<@salimma:fedora.im>
16:50:19
plumbers is after our next meeting right?
<@davide:cavalca.name>
16:50:39
oh you're right, I head out on the 13th
<@davide:cavalca.name>
16:50:45
so the next one is fine
<@salimma:fedora.im>
16:50:54
I'll be on PTO from next Thursday until the following Thursday
<@salimma:fedora.im>
16:51:28
and then fly out for Plumbers on 15th
<@davide:cavalca.name>
16:51:31
we only have a few minutes left, so let's move to
<@davide:cavalca.name>
16:51:32
!topic Miscellaneous
<@davide:cavalca.name>
16:52:11
anything else folks want to discuss?
<@salimma:fedora.im>
16:54:27
none from me
<@davide:cavalca.name>
16:54:46
I think we can end early then
<@davide:cavalca.name>
16:54:51
thanks everyone, and see you soon
<@davide:cavalca.name>
16:54:53
!endmeeting