16:30:54 #startmeeting Fedora CommOps (2016-10-25) 16:30:54 Meeting started Tue Oct 25 16:30:54 2016 UTC. The chair is jflory7. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 16:30:54 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 16:30:55 The meeting name has been set to 'fedora_commops_(2016-10-25)' 16:30:55 #meetingname commops 16:30:55 The meeting name has been set to 'commops' 16:30:57 #nick commops 16:31:03 #topic Agenda 16:31:06 hello everybody o/ 16:31:10 #link https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Meeting:CommOps_2016-10-25 16:31:11 hijacking failed skamath 16:31:13 :< 16:31:15 #info (1) Roll Call / Q&A 16:31:20 #info (2) Announcements 16:31:24 ;_; 16:31:24 #info (3) Action items from last meeting 16:31:29 #info (4) Tickets 16:31:34 We have to be faster next time and start 5 minutes early 16:31:34 #info (5) Community Blog 16:31:36 * Rhea nods 16:31:39 #info (6) Release Schedule 16:31:44 #info (7) Open Floor 16:31:52 #topic Roll Call / Q&A 16:31:52 #info Name; Timezone; Sub-projects/Interest Areas 16:31:58 #action commops New members, make sure you introduce yourself on the CommOps mailing list [ https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/CommOps/Join ] 16:32:01 If this is your first time at a CommOps meeting, feel free to introduce yourself to everyone and say hello! If anyone has any questions before we get started with the rest of the agenda, now is also a good time to ask. 16:32:02 .hello skamath 16:32:02 skamath: skamath 'Sachin S Kamath ' 16:32:05 .hello jflory7 16:32:07 jflory7: jflory7 'Justin W. Flory' 16:32:12 .hello rhea 16:32:13 Rhea: rhea 'Radka Janek' 16:32:24 #info Sachin S. Kamath; UTC +5.30; CommOps, Metrics, GSoC, Join, * 16:32:27 jflory7, o/ 16:32:39 jflory7, Busy with classes? 16:32:43 #info Justin W. Flory; UTC-4; CommOps, Magazine, Marketing, Diversity Team, Ambassadors, sysadmin-badges, and more 16:32:43 #info Dhanesh B. Sabane, UTC+5:30, CommOps, Marketing, Python, Packaging 16:32:47 bt0: Greetings! 16:32:52 jflory7: o/ 16:32:57 skamath: Heh, guess it's obvious I'm running behind this week, huh? :P 16:32:58 skamath: o/ 16:33:01 dhanesh95: o/ 16:33:01 Rhea: o/ 16:33:03 Rhea: o/ 16:33:09 #info Alberto Rodriguez; UTC-5;Stats,Metrics,R,Python,storytelling and more 16:33:11 #chair bt0 skamath dhanesh95 Rhea 16:33:11 Current chairs: Rhea bt0 dhanesh95 jflory7 skamath 16:33:31 #info Radka Janek; UTC+1; CommOps, Diversity, DotNet,... 16:33:39 jflory7, totally understandable. Classes can get hectic :P 16:33:43 I'm still getting plugged in now 16:33:51 I have a lot of missed scrollback this morning :P 16:33:51 Hey guys :] 16:34:13 skamath: jflory7's robots would never let you hijack a meeting 16:34:18 I will be trying to get caught up on the next few hours today. 16:34:19 Rhea^^ 16:34:19 lolol 16:34:26 ;_; 16:34:45 * skamath is making a ransomware to target them 16:35:14 And then have a DynDNS-level DDoS attack? :P 16:35:18 ò_ó 16:35:20 Hahahahah 16:35:23 Sure, why not 16:35:24 :P 16:35:40 Even though pretty soon, I might need someone to fill in for me in a meeting or two down the line 16:35:47 Will share on the mailing list when I know for sure 16:35:51 Did I land in the right meeting? ;p 16:36:00 We are always around jflory7 :) 16:36:23 Anyone else hanging around here today? We can wait a couple more minutes for anyone else to arrive. 16:36:25 skamath++ 16:37:39 Admittedly, I am a little underprepared this week, so the meeting may be a little more succinct 16:38:46 Okay, we can jump into announcements. Going to make them on the fly today. 16:38:47 #topic Announcements 16:38:59 #info === "What does Factory 2.0 mean for Modularity?" === 16:39:07 #link https://communityblog.fedoraproject.org/factory-2-0-mean-modularity/ 16:39:50 #info This blog post goes a little deeper into some of the tooling behind making Fedora more modular in its composition. Read more in nardasev's breakdown of Factory 2.0. 16:40:10 #info === "Fedora 25 supplemental wallpapers" === 16:40:15 #link https://fedoramagazine.org/fedora-25-supplemental-wallpapers/ 16:40:43 \o/ 16:40:43 #info The Fedora 25 Supplemental Wallpapers were selected this week. You can see what will be included in the upcoming release of Fedora 25 in this post. 16:40:47 .hello bee2502 16:40:48 bee2502: bee2502 'Bhagyashree Padalkar' 16:40:50 eof 16:40:59 My wallpaper submission tops it :P 16:41:12 I'm a little short on announcements, but that's also probably related to the fact I've been behind on CommBlog 16:41:17 skamath++ I saw yours got selected :) 16:41:24 skamath++ Whoa!!! Awesome! 16:41:24 Drops On Pebble by skamath 16:41:25 #info Ankur Sinha UTC +1 16:41:25 bee2502, o/ 16:41:28 Nice one! 16:41:30 Hey bee2502 :) 16:41:32 #chair bee2502 16:41:32 Current chairs: Rhea bee2502 bt0 dhanesh95 jflory7 skamath 16:41:34 skamath++ 16:41:37 sorry, missed the time! 16:41:38 :) 16:41:55 Cool, cprofitt also made it in there too :) 16:41:56 * skamath waves to Captain FranciscoD 16:41:58 .fas linuxmodder 16:41:59 linuxmodder: linuxmodder 'Corey W Sheldon' 16:42:01 Hey FranciscoD! 16:42:01 super later -- sorry 16:42:02 * FranciscoD sits down in a corner to watch :) 16:42:03 heya! 16:42:06 #chair FranciscoD linuxmodder 16:42:06 Current chairs: FranciscoD Rhea bee2502 bt0 dhanesh95 jflory7 linuxmodder skamath 16:42:08 linuxmodder: o/ 16:42:18 * skamath waves to linuxmodder as well 16:42:34 Okay, going to switch over to action items. 16:42:38 #topic Action items from last meeting 16:42:44 #link https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2016-10-18/commops.2016-10-18-16.30.html 16:42:50 #info How This Works: We look at past #action items from the last meeting for quick follow-up. If a task is completed, we move on to the next one. If it isn't, we get an update and re-action it if needed. If no status, we'll try to get a quick update and move forward. 16:42:59 #info === skamath Follow up with Infrastructure team on fas=>bz email lookup rules and whether a fix can be made to gracefully handle failed lookups === 16:43:07 skamath: Not sure if you caught my email. 16:43:10 #link https://github.com/fedora-infra/fedmsg_meta_fedora_infrastructure/issues/399 16:43:13 skamath++ 16:43:15 Oh, brilliant 16:43:17 jflory7, I pinged you on channel yesterday 16:43:24 #info Inform users 4.7.9-200 kernel is patched for Dirty cow still seeing lots of scary talk of it among users 16:43:25 I guess you missed the messages? 16:43:29 skamath: Ahhh, okay, I wasn't around much yesterday. 16:43:50 jflory7, I basically edited my existing issue of mailman 16:43:51 linuxmodder: Thanks, but we can fit that in after this topic - we're covering past action items. Is this a blog post idea? 16:43:52 #undo 16:43:52 Removing item from minutes: INFO by linuxmodder at 16:43:24 : Inform users 4.7.9-200 kernel is patched for Dirty cow still seeing lots of scary talk of it among users 16:43:55 It's the same blocker 16:44:24 If it's a blog post idea, let's make sure we cover this during the CommBlog bit 16:44:42 jflory7, what part ? confuised 16:44:45 skamath: I'm about 24 hours behind in most channels right now. 16:45:13 linuxmodder: I'm not sure what your #info was about. Did you mean to mention that for the Community Blog? 16:45:14 #info === [COMPLETE] jflory7 File ticket for looking into centralizing / making more clear what a member of Council or FESCo does, what their responsibilities are, and centralize the info in a wiki page or CommBlog article === 16:45:18 #link https://pagure.io/fedora-commops/issue/93 16:45:22 nm 16:45:23 #info === [COMPLETE] jflory7 Reach out to skamath about Infrastructure / Bugzilla+FAS lookup rules === 16:45:29 #info === jflory7 Begin drafting a Community Blog post for Fedora Appreciation Day === 16:45:39 #info Holding off on this until a date will be selected 16:45:51 #info === [COMPLETE] jflory7 Post to the mailing list about selecting a new sub-project to work with on the on-boarding process === 16:45:51 #info Discussed during meetings, have selected Marketing + G11n 16:45:57 #info === jflory7 Open up discussion about Fedora Appreciation Day date on the mailing list === 16:46:03 #action jflory7 Open up discussion about Fedora Appreciation Day date on the mailing list 16:46:13 linuxmodder, I guess a Commblog post about the patch can help spread the word. 16:46:17 #info === [INCOMPLETE] jflory7 Take the discussion points from today's meeting, lay out the earlier problems, expand on solutions, and try to offer mock implementations in the Marketing ticket === 16:46:26 #action jflory7 Take the discussion points from today's meeting, lay out the earlier problems, expand on solutions, and try to offer mock implementations in the Marketing ticket 16:46:33 #info === jflory7 Process and review pending Community Blog articles for publishing === 16:46:35 linuxmodder, Twitter outreach works as well 16:46:38 #action jflory7 Process and review pending Community Blog articles for publishing 16:46:41 ^ happening today 16:46:45 eof 16:46:48 skamath, its already on fb and twitter but any post I do would be WAY to in depth for the blog can catch it on planet 16:47:03 That's all past action items from the previous meeting. 16:47:10 Ah, I guess I missed the tweet 16:47:14 can take a look at dotnet onboarding heh 16:47:15 jflory7++ 16:47:23 my edit ability seems to have been yanked in the migration so can't do jack for that atm anyway 16:47:41 on both mag and blog 16:47:41 Rhea: Actually, yeah, we can incorporate this into a discussion here too 16:47:48 linuxmodder: You've lost permissions? 16:47:50 #topic Tickets 16:47:55 #link https://pagure.io/fedora-commops/issues?tags=meeting 16:48:27 jflory7, weeks ago this is not first time I'm netioned but whatevs 16:48:28 Some of these tickets tagged for the meeting won't make sense to discuss today since nothing has changed since previous times or there is no new data to move forward 16:48:30 * mailga around 16:48:45 mailga, o/ 16:48:51 linuxmodder: Oh – this is the first time I was aware. Will you have time after the meeting to figure it out? 16:48:54 mailga: Hiya! 16:48:56 #chair mailga 16:48:56 Current chairs: FranciscoD Rhea bee2502 bt0 dhanesh95 jflory7 linuxmodder mailga skamath 16:49:18 hi skamath and hello all 16:49:18 jflory7, at this point its moot point but whenever 16:50:03 I mentioned it last mtg and last starter pitch before that its whatever 16:50:08 So, for the listed tickets, I haven't had a chance to expand deeper on the marketing ticket... the Appreciation Day was agreed to postpone until we have a chance to look at a different date for it. 16:50:46 #93 is new with regards to Elections, and we could discuss the EDU Talking Points ticket but I haven't had time to develop any further ideas 16:51:11 Unfortunately this week has had me busier with other things to get caught up 16:51:23 on EDU there was Much chat at BsidesDC from HS and College types about ambassador sstyle work 16:51:52 like 30 inquiries kinda traffic 16:51:57 linuxmodder: Oh, I guess I misunderstood what you were saying at past meetings then. I didn't know there was a loss of privileges or that there was an issue 16:52:11 linuxmodder: Hmmm, interesting. We could spend some time on the talking points ticket then 16:52:48 Will introduce the new ticket with regards to elections 16:52:53 * as well 16:52:58 #info === Ticket #93 === 16:53:07 #info "Elections: Better explain roles of Council and FESCo" 16:53:11 #link https://pagure.io/fedora-commops/issue/93 16:53:13 I'll jsut add to ticket 16:53:21 #info As part of the Elections discussion in #90, it would be helpful to better explain the roles of the Fedora Council and FESCo to motivate new candidates to run for election. 16:53:23 re: eDU ^ 16:53:33 linuxmodder: Ah, okay, that works great too. Thanks! linuxmodder++ 16:53:57 The ticket is a little long, but it more fully explains the background and analysis of this topic 16:54:35 One of the things I remember jkurik expressing concern over was the seemingly low interest in some of the electable seats within Fedora, like FESCo and the Council. 16:54:49 For anyone who wasn't aware, FESCo = Fedora Engineering Steering Council 16:55:43 It was identified that part of this might be attributed to the fact that it's unclear what people in these committees *do*. The wiki pages only offer a very generalized, high-level overview of tasks without any examples or smaller points about common tasks and responsibilities. 16:55:45 jflory7: not Council, Committee instead 16:56:17 mailga: I think the Council as well as the committees like FESCo, FAmSCo, FOSCo, etc.? 16:57:17 jflory7: I'm not the right person, I'm not aware about the english differences amongs them. I only think Council is more elevate than committe. 16:57:22 I had a proposed implementation about how we could better communicate some of the info about tasks and roles in electable positions, but haven't gone much further or received any feedback yet. 16:58:06 mailga: Ahh, I see what you mean. I think the Council is the executive decision-making body in the project, but they also suffer from the same problem as the committees as well with number of nominees and voter interest and engagement. 16:59:32 jflory7: I see, but FESCo is Fedora Engineering Steering Committee, you said before Fedora Engineering Steering Council. Sorry for the interruption. 17:00:07 #help This ticket could use someone to help lead efforts on communicating with members of each body, coming up with ways to better communicate a list of tasks and responsibilities, possibly help write a blog post about these, and help communicate them leading up to the election. The intended impact is to increase the number of nominees for election. 17:00:12 mailga: Not an issue at all :) 17:00:56 I'm not able to help do much on this ticket, but this is definitely something that could be broken up into smaller pieces for some other people to help with. For example... 17:01:34 I imagine one person could try reaching out to one committee / group to help work individually with them on their roles/responsibilities and then helping add that into the wiki and a blog post 17:01:44 So it would be a lot smaller pieces than the big #help item above. 17:01:57 * skamath needs to read more about *Co 17:02:20 They all look confusing 17:02:27 I can grab some links too, one sec 17:02:57 #link https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Council 17:03:03 #link https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Engineering_Steering_Committee 17:03:10 #link https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Ambassadors_Steering_Committee 17:03:16 #link https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FOSCo 17:03:34 Those are the current four bodies in Fedora that have electable seats 17:03:38 * dhanesh95 would like to learn from skamath when he clears the confusion 17:03:50 * mailga thinks that Mr. than is receiving a lot of notifications... 17:04:03 jflory7, Thanks! 17:04:06 jflory7++ 17:04:13 jflory7++ 17:04:15 skamath: What bits did you find confusing? The task or the bodies themselves? 17:04:20 * skamath bookmarks 'em all 17:04:20 God bless you jflory7 17:04:35 jflory7 : tbh, I am not aware of the councils at all. 17:04:41 The names looked confusing. 17:05:00 Same here skamath 17:05:15 Yeah, the acronyms are a bit confusing. 17:05:22 * linuxmodder is not gonna get into why he feels this happens so often 17:05:24 I can give a very brief, brief summary of them. 17:05:37 That'd be great :) 17:06:33 I just go by "FsomethingCo" okay 17:06:42 "some comittee.." 17:07:01 I never know which one is which :D 17:07:21 #info Council: Executive decision-making body in Fedora consisting of Red Hat and community members; FESCo: Responsible for reviewing and handling all high-level technical decisions within the project (I think this includes per-release changes and packaging standards); FAmSCo: Decision-making body for the Ambassadors that helps coordinate across all regions of the world to assist with the needs of representing and advocating Fedora in the field; 17:07:21 FOSCo: A soon-to-be group consisting of people across the community to help enhance communication among specific key groups 17:07:35 #info [con] FOSCo: A soon-to-be group consisting of people across the community to help enhance communication among specific key groups 17:08:10 Rhea: Yeah, I think that's the same kind of thing that prevents someone from either nominating themselves or nominating someone else. It is confusing. 17:08:19 jflory7 is a walking Fedora wiki :P 17:08:22 Ideally, we would be trying to help with that. 17:08:24 .thank jflory7 17:08:24 skamath thinks jflory7 is awesome and is happy they are helping! (Please don't forget to jflory7++ also) 17:08:30 :D 17:08:38 :P 17:08:43 skamath++ 17:08:55 .thank jflory7 x100 17:08:55 dhanesh95 thinks jflory7 x100 is awesome and is happy they are helping! (Please don't forget to jflory7 x100++ also) 17:09:08 Anyways... I don't have the time to devote to this task presently, but I could offer guidance and help some others take lead here 17:09:21 It could be a single person or one of many people 17:10:04 * skamath can help 17:10:20 If not in the meeting, I can try to make a post on the list that summarizes the tasks and how to help, if that would be easier. 17:10:23 I could do either way 17:10:46 Awesome, I'll reply to you on the list then 17:10:53 * jflory7 nods 17:11:06 That gives me a little flexibility to space out the different steps 17:11:27 #action jflory7 Post to the mailing list breaking down how to help with Ticket #93 (due:2016-10-25) 17:11:43 jflory7++ 17:11:57 Once I get that out, could definitely use some help on this ticket. 17:12:07 jflory7: at the moment FAmSCo and FOSCo are out of the game. 17:12:14 Trying to help make it so fewer things are blocking on me... 17:12:15 Just don't'make it too detailed - don't spend more time explaining the issue than it would take you to solve it :P 17:12:17 mailga: Ahh, actually... 17:12:39 mailga: Do you know what the current stance is on FAmSCo continuing on past FOSCo? 17:12:44 Or will both exist at the same time 17:12:45 *? 17:12:55 Rhea: Agreed. 17:12:59 Rhea++ 17:13:57 jflory7: seems the way is keep alive both of them, not my idea (as someone daid before, maybe too many confusing bodies), but we're waiting for the bexelbie and cwickert proposals. 17:14:07 Okay, I see 17:14:18 So then it may still be of use to still gather this info for FAmSCo then 17:15:16 #info Auxiliary planning note: FAmSCo and FOSCo will not be participating in upcoming election, but both may exist at the same time. Gathering facts for FAmSCo still has merit. 17:15:23 jflory7: IMO if FAmSCo will be alive after FOSCo happens, it will be a committee of the four regions. 17:15:39 That's one way I could still see it working well 17:15:42 .thank mailga 17:15:42 jflory7 thinks mailga is awesome and is happy they are helping! (Please don't forget to mailga++ also) 17:15:45 mailga++ 17:16:04 jflory7: yw 17:16:22 Okay, so I will work on getting this to the mailing list 17:16:40 #info === Ticket #44 === 17:16:43 #info " Talking Points: EDU" 17:16:47 #link https://pagure.io/fedora-commops/issue/44 17:17:38 #info Resuming previous discussion about generating talking points about EDU outreach by Fedorans in academic settings. Talking points would make it easier for a student, faculty, or staff member at a school to help promote Fedora among their peers or in the university itself. 17:18:22 #info jflory7 will make a post to the mailing list about updating status on this ticket and getting input by CommOps members 17:18:32 I have a previous action for this as well 17:19:15 Not sure what else to add here right now, but I've started to work on this ticket and would like to open it up ASAP for input from the rest of you. 17:19:37 +1 17:19:45 +1 17:19:55 jflory7, what have you started on this ? 17:20:42 linuxmodder: Trying to generate some points of my own to share with students from a student perspective, but I was also hoping to template ways for input from people from various regions or positions in a university since this is a global task. 17:22:57 Okay, this is really all I had prepped for the ticket discussion today. A little unprepared, but I'm planning on making a lot of progress today 17:23:02 #topic Community Blog 17:23:08 #info How This Works: There is a quick blast of information about what was published in the past week with some metrics, followed by posts that are being drafted. After the information blast, the floor is opened for any Community Blog-related discussion. Here we go! 17:23:15 #info === This Week in CommBlog === 17:23:22 #info (1) "What does Factory 2.0 mean for Modularity?" 17:23:28 #link https://communityblog.fedoraproject.org/factory-2-0-mean-modularity/ 17:23:36 #info Metrics not yet available in Jetpack 17:23:47 #info === Coming Up in CommBlog === 17:25:14 #info 11 new posts: Migration from Trac, Flock Stories 2016, Episode 1: Redon Skikuli, Fedora at LinuxCon Europe 2016, FOSSwave at CMRIT, [Test Day] Fedora 25 Better Switchable Graphics Support, Internationalization test day report for Fedora 25, Fedora 25 – Lets have an awesome party!, Heroes of Fedora (HoF) – F25 Beta, Heroes of Fedora (HoF) – F25 Alpha, Heroes of Fedora (HoF) – F24 Final 17:25:20 Woah 17:25:30 #info jflory7 plans to process these today and get them on a schedule 17:26:04 Yeah... lots of new content... I'm definitely running behind 17:26:20 But will be resolved today. 17:26:22 jflory7, Or CommBlog is running way ahead ;) 17:26:28 skamath: I like that perspective 17:26:30 and that's definitely a good thing. 17:26:31 skamath++ 17:26:42 Hahah, you are absolutely correct 17:26:54 #info Thank you to all authors who have patiently waited for their articles to be processed! 17:27:20 Anyways, that will be today... 17:27:22 #topic Release Schedule 17:27:27 #link https://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-25/f-25-key-tasks.html 17:27:34 #info (1) Final Freeze (Tue 2016-11-01, 00:00 UTC) 17:27:39 #info (2) Final Release Public Availability (GA) (Tue 2016-11-15) 17:27:45 #info (3) Fedora 22 EOL auto closure (Tue 2016-12-13) 17:27:52 Final release is not too far off… 17:27:58 #topic Open Floor 17:28:09 Okay, open floor 17:28:16 We're running a little ahead of schedule today. 17:28:26 Anyone have any questions, comments, things they want to discuss? 17:28:30 Now is the perfect time. :) 17:28:40 * skamath is thinking 17:28:59 Nothing strikes me now. 17:29:25 nothing 17:29:30 nope 17:29:43 I have nothing either right now. 17:29:45 You mentioned onboarding, so what's the plan with that? Does it make sense to consider dotnet? 17:31:06 Rhea: Yeah, good question. So part of the running list of tasks for me is to process the info from Marketing last week so we can move forward with that. Part of it includes reaching out directly to marketing, which are all things to be done. As for Dotnet, they're a group we could definitely help target, and we could also try to help in the same ways we did for the Python SIG and the Modularity WG. 17:31:26 We could help provide resources and assistance for getting the team started and its presence noted within Fedora. 17:31:39 Did someone say Onboarding? :D 17:32:04 :) 17:32:16 Want me to give you quick status report? 17:32:43 The floor is all yours :D 17:33:02 Yeah, go for it! 17:34:02 So there is a dotnet-sig FAS group now, dotnet-sig mailing list, and #fedora-dotnet all set... The problem will happen when we get into packages and seriously try to push it into future releases of Fedora, the same issue will be with the wiki page, you can find a dirty wiki page here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DotNet 17:34:19 It should really be either https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/DotNet or... I don't really know, that question is beyond me... 17:34:22 #topic Information for the Dotnet SIG 17:34:41 Wiki is one of the topics for our first irc meeting, what info should we throw in and how to set it up. 17:34:44 #info Created: dotnet-sig FAS group, mailing list, IRC channel (#fedora-dotnet) 17:34:50 #link https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DotNet 17:35:10 #help Problem will be when getting packages into Fedora and trying to push them into future releases 17:35:12 My idea was that the wiki/dotnet would be used as general dotnet resource about all-things dotnet, and split off the SIG part of the page into it's own place where it should be wiki/SIGs/dotnet 17:35:30 #help Wiki is a first area to focus on for SIG 17:35:55 Now about packages, once we get that far, we will have to either up the sig requirements to require `packager` - or create second FAS group as was done with Python 17:36:10 Rhea: That logic makes sense, I think other programming language SIGs do the same 17:36:10 * skamath has no experience with dotnet 17:36:30 skamath: None should be necessary to help with this. :) 17:36:36 Something that I came across : https://github.com/dotnet/cli/issues/3717 17:36:39 How about this... 17:36:40 Is it packaged yet? 17:37:11 err irc meeting... today you may have noticed that I was hunting for resources on schedules/times and stuff, I have an email written for the mailing list, where I would like to set up some reasonable weekly meeting... 17:37:21 (didn't send it yet) 17:37:30 * dhanesh95 has no business with Microsoft technologies 17:37:45 That's about as far as I got in last two weeks... 17:37:55 Rhea: Do you think you could file a ticket in the CommOps Pagure with the notes you just mentioned, particular to: (1) what you have created, (2) things you think would be helpful, and (3) areas you think could use some extra brainstorming or thinking from others. From there, we can discuss in the ticket and then allocate time to follow up on any comments / ideas in a meeting. But we could start laying some things down now in a ticket. 17:38:07 (1) being things like FAS group, mailing list, etc. 17:38:10 dotnet: it basically runs similar to java as far as linux is concerned, but i like to say that it's in fact a lot closer "to the metal" 17:38:38 jflory7: yep 17:38:44 Rhea++ Awesome! 17:38:49 I will action it to make it official 17:38:57 * mailga is not aware about what dotnet is, is it severe? 17:38:58 Rhea++ 17:39:16 #action Rhea File ticket in CommOps Pagure for on-boarding help with Dotnet SIG, particular to: (1) what you have created, (2) things you think would be helpful, and (3) areas you think could use some extra brainstorming or thinking from others 17:39:19 action meh 17:39:22 hehe 17:39:36 .thank jflory7 17:39:36 Rhea thinks jflory7 is awesome and is happy they are helping! (Please don't forget to jflory7++ also) 17:39:46 mailga: It's a programming language heavily used within the Microsoft world, and it was just recently open sourced as well, and Linux support is growing. 17:39:55 "C# .NET Core" 17:39:56 At least, that's my interpretation :) 17:40:00 Looks like DO is kinda unstable right now 17:40:15 #topic Open Floor 17:40:29 Okay, cool, glad we got that covered. Thanks for bringing it up, Rhea. 17:40:31 .thank Rhea 17:40:33 jflory7 thinks Rhea is awesome and is happy they are helping! (Please don't forget to Rhea++ also) 17:40:36 Anything else to cover here? 17:40:46 jflory7: thanks. 17:40:47 mailga, I have been trying to email a proposal but the list won't take my email :( 17:40:55 C# is C# in general, .NET runs on windows-only, then you have "mono" which is multiplatform, then freshly released (two months ago) .NET Core (by microsoft) which is slightly stripped down version of .NET 17:41:04 DO is very unstable. I am getting weird timeouts. 17:41:16 Ahhh, okay, I see, Rhea. I didn't know the hierarchy there. 17:41:21 skamath: DigitalOcean? 17:41:23 .NET Core aka dnx, usually just refered to as dotnet on linux because there isn't any other dotnet on linux... 17:41:24 bexelbie: cwickert didn't accept your subscription yet? 17:41:26 jflory7, Yes. 17:41:55 skamath: Is it your virus you wrote to get my bots DDoSing? :P 17:42:01 :D 17:42:05 mailga, no, and I emailed Abdel to have him forward and he hasn't afaik 17:42:08 lolol 17:42:18 Damn, I think I directed it the wrong way. 17:42:39 Whoops, I dint do it ^ 17:42:47 bexelbie: I don't remember if Jiri is still an admin of the ML. 17:42:49 Only jflory7 is my target 17:42:51 bexelbie: I think I ran into the same issue with the FAmSCo mailing list. I don't think potty is an admin, I think it's Christoph and one other person I can't rememner. 17:42:53 * remember 17:43:03 I had asked potty to add me but he was unable to do so 17:43:10 well whomever the admins are they should have been pinged to approve the subs 17:43:13 s/subs/sub/ 17:43:17 * jflory7 nod 17:43:24 and the list is setup to reject, not moderate, which is ... less than helpful 17:43:25 Hi 17:43:28 Let me check 17:43:33 bexelbie: are you in Brno? 17:43:35 skamath mmm... kinky... 17:43:37 Oh, hi potty :) 17:43:40 mailga, at the moment, no 17:43:45 But I think Christoph is admin 17:43:52 * bexelbie is in Austin, TX 17:43:54 USA 17:43:59 Anywho 17:44:08 bexelbie: we need Jiri, he was an admin afaik. 17:44:11 I guess we can go ahead and close out the meeting for today 17:44:26 mailga: correct. The other admin is Jiri 17:44:32 bexelbie: have you a way (RH intern) to reach sesivany? 17:45:21 He should respond to direct email? 17:45:23 jflory7: close the meeting. 17:45:26 * jflory7 nods 17:45:38 Okay, thanks for coming out today, everyone. Will catch you somewhere in Fedoraland soon... 17:45:40 #endmeeting