<@jflory7:fedora.im>
14:07:24
!startmeeting Fedora Council meeting - 2026-04-08
<@meetbot:fedora.im>
14:07:25
Meeting started at 2026-04-08 14:07:24 UTC
<@meetbot:fedora.im>
14:07:25
The Meeting name is 'Fedora Council meeting - 2026-04-08'
<@jflory7:fedora.im>
14:07:28
!meetingname council
<@meetbot:fedora.im>
14:07:29
The Meeting Name is now council
<@jspaleta:fedora.im>
14:07:39
!hi
<@zodbot:fedora.im>
14:07:40
Jef Spaleta (jspaleta) - he / him / his
<@jflory7:fedora.im>
14:08:02
!group members council
<@zodbot:fedora.im>
14:08:04
Members of council: Aoife Moloney, Aleksandra Fedorova, Miro Hrončok, Dave Cantrell, jflory7 (@jflory7:fedora.im, @fca:fedoraproject.org), Jona Azizaj, Jef Spaleta, Laura Santamaria, Petr Bokoč, Peter Boy, Ryan Lerch, Akashdeep Dhar
<@churchyard:fedora.im>
14:08:07
!hi
<@zodbot:fedora.im>
14:08:09
Miro Hrončok (churchyard) - he / him / his or they / them / theirs
<@jflory7:fedora.im>
14:08:19
!topic Intros, welcomes, hellos!topic Intros, welcomes, hellos
<@jflory7:fedora.im>
14:08:25
!info Welcome to another Fedora Council meeting! If you are present and intend to follow along with today's meeting, please identify yourself by typing `!hi` in the chat. Council members in attendance will have their attendance noted before moving to the agenda.
<@churchyard:fedora.im>
14:08:30
I need to run afk for a while, but I will hopefully be right back
<@jflory7:fedora.im>
14:08:51
No problem!
<@jonatoni:fedora.im>
14:09:32
!hi
<@zodbot:fedora.im>
14:09:33
Jona Azizaj (jonatoni) - she / her / hers
<@pbokoc:fedora.im>
14:10:16
!hi
<@zodbot:fedora.im>
14:10:17
Petr Bokoč (pbokoc)
<@jflory7:fedora.im>
14:11:29
We are ten minutes past, so I'm going to go ahead and move forward…
<@jflory7:fedora.im>
14:11:54
!info Present: @jflory7, @jspaleta, @churchyard, @jonatoni, @pbokoc
<@jflory7:fedora.im>
14:11:54
It's a little quieter today than usual.
<@jflory7:fedora.im>
14:12:08
!topic Meeting Agenda
<@jflory7:fedora.im>
14:12:11
!link https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Council_Meetings#Next_Meeting_Agenda
<@jflory7:fedora.im>
14:12:20
The agenda is outdated.
<@jflory7:fedora.im>
14:13:01
!link https://forge.fedoraproject.org/council/tickets/issues
<@jflory7:fedora.im>
14:14:27
!link https://forge.fedoraproject.org/council/-/projects/2
<@jflory7:fedora.im>
14:14:31
Oh, I forgot, I made this 🙂
<@jflory7:fedora.im>
14:15:17
I see three tickets tagged for discussion.
<@jflory7:fedora.im>
14:15:21
And I think those three make sense
<@jflory7:fedora.im>
14:15:24
For today
<@pbokoc:fedora.im>
14:15:25
Ha, nice. I need to play with forgejo projects a bit for docs, too.
<@jflory7:fedora.im>
14:15:49
I used the Four Foundations colors for the project board. It is on brand but somehow I don't think it fits in well with Forgejo UI, heh 😄
<@jflory7:fedora.im>
14:15:59
Anyways, I'm going to go with these tickets if no objections or requests
<@jflory7:fedora.im>
14:16:36
!info Ticket #460: Relicense Fedora-logos
<@jflory7:fedora.im>
14:16:40
!link https://forge.fedoraproject.org/council/tickets/issues/460
<@jflory7:fedora.im>
14:16:53
!info Ticket #555: Council Strategy Summit 2026 – 2-6 February 2026 – Tirana, Albania
<@jflory7:fedora.im>
14:16:57
!link https://forge.fedoraproject.org/council/tickets/issues/555
<@jflory7:fedora.im>
14:17:17
!info Ticket #557: Guidance necessary: Join SIG and temporary memberships for the sole purpose of voting in FESCo election
<@jflory7:fedora.im>
14:17:21
!link https://forge.fedoraproject.org/council/tickets/issues/557
<@jflory7:fedora.im>
14:17:26
^^ this one is related to Fedora Verified
<@jflory7:fedora.im>
14:17:29
Let's get going the
<@jflory7:fedora.im>
14:17:31
^^ this one is related to Fedora Verifiedn
<@jflory7:fedora.im>
14:17:34
^^ this one is related to Fedora Verified
<@jflory7:fedora.im>
14:17:35
Let's get going then!
<@jflory7:fedora.im>
14:18:01
!topic Ticket #460: Relicense Fedora-logos
<@jflory7:fedora.im>
14:18:06
!link https://forge.fedoraproject.org/council/tickets/issues/460
<@jflory7:fedora.im>
14:18:28
So, I triaged this ticket from July 2023 for today, because we really need to make a decision and move on.
<@jflory7:fedora.im>
14:18:43
!info Triaging this ticket with `?/needs vote` since Red Hat Legal [provided an official opinion](https://forge.fedoraproject.org/council/tickets/issues/460#issuecomment-531608) on this issue. The ticket has been pending since July 2023, and there is no reason why we cannot vote on this matter now and seek closure here.
<@jflory7:fedora.im>
14:19:09
I propose we take a vote on this, since Legal weighed in.
<@jflory7:fedora.im>
14:19:17
There is no reason this needs to sit pending for another year.
<@jflory7:fedora.im>
14:19:23
Does anyone have questions?
<@jflory7:fedora.im>
14:19:34
!group members council
<@zodbot:fedora.im>
14:19:36
Members of council: Aoife Moloney, Aleksandra Fedorova, Miro Hrončok, Dave Cantrell, jflory7 (@jflory7:fedora.im, @fca:fedoraproject.org), Jona Azizaj, Jef Spaleta, Laura Santamaria, Petr Bokoč, Peter Boy, Ryan Lerch, Akashdeep Dhar
<@jflory7:fedora.im>
14:19:51
I am getting emails from activity by other Council members who are not here in this meeting… 😄
<@churchyard:fedora.im>
14:21:46
so, legal says "I have recommended to Red Hat's trademark counsel against the proposal to replace the fedora-logos license with CC-BY-ND"
<@churchyard:fedora.im>
14:22:03
I am a bit lost on what we would vote on exactly then
<@jflory7:fedora.im>
14:22:59
We vote on whether we make this change to the Fedora licensing guidelines
<@jflory7:fedora.im>
14:23:12
My vote is `-1`, we close this ticket, and we revisit if the context changes
<@jflory7:fedora.im>
14:23:26
But this ticket sitting open for three years is not helping anyone, and if we aren't doing it, let's just vote and close it
<@jspaleta:fedora.im>
14:23:28
what's the specific proposal....
<@churchyard:fedora.im>
14:23:36
*what* change to the Fedora licensing guidelines?
<@jspaleta:fedora.im>
14:23:39
the top comment doesnt make a specific license proposal
<@jflory7:fedora.im>
14:23:43
Jef Spaleta: Relicense Fedora logos under a Creative Commons license
<@jflory7:fedora.im>
14:23:53
Jef Spaleta: https://pagure.io/fedora-logos/pull-request/24
<@jflory7:fedora.im>
14:24:01
!link https://pagure.io/fork/msuchy/fedora-logos/blob/8d7e02b1593767671de0afdf412639ac115b4583/f/LICENSE.txt
<@jflory7:fedora.im>
14:24:32
!link https://pagure.io/fedora-logos/pull-request/24
<@churchyard:fedora.im>
14:24:35
so legal said "not recommended" but we could still approve that change?
<@pbokoc:fedora.im>
14:24:38
There's also this issue linked within, which is closed as "nope": https://gitlab.com/fedora/legal/fedora-license-data/-/work_items/218
<@jflory7:fedora.im>
14:24:41
We could 🙂
<@jflory7:fedora.im>
14:24:45
Theoretically
<@jflory7:fedora.im>
14:24:48
But doesn't seem wise
<@jflory7:fedora.im>
14:25:36
@spot also weighed in: "Since Red Hat legal wrote the original license, I really want them to chime in here before we hit merge."
<@jflory7:fedora.im>
14:25:42
But RH Legal did weigh in…
<@churchyard:fedora.im>
14:26:09
I abstain because I don't think we have the power to approve this if we wanted to.
<@pbokoc:fedora.im>
14:26:19
I agree with Justin, -1 and close. I don't want to pick a fight with a bunch of lawyers :D
<@jflory7:fedora.im>
14:26:24
We could also say there is not a clear proposal and close the ticket as invalid, but given the discussion, I think there is a proposal we are being asked to vote on
<@jflory7:fedora.im>
14:26:37
Alright then. Let me write a `!proposed` and then we take a vote, and move on
<@jspaleta:fedora.im>
14:27:49
pr as context... provides specific license.. and legal opinion is against that license... so I'm a -1. The question remains, do we put work into finding the right license.. or do we live with the exceptional status of this content
<@emma:rory.gay>
14:28:16
just to provide more context from the stuff mentioned in fedora: unsure what nixos falls under, found 3 packages with these licenses: CCA 4.0, MIT, CC0 v1.0 Universal
<@jflory7:fedora.im>
14:28:16
!proposed After input from Red Hat Legal and the recommendation given to the trademark counsel at Red Hat/IBM, we agree to reject the change to the Fedora logo licensing because it creates ambiguity and has a messy intersection with trademark law, which is not as "settled" matter for open source like copyright law. Since the relicensing of the logos does not have a discernible impact on our outputs, deliverables, or work as the Fedora Project, we reject this proposal for changing the licensing of the Fedora logo assets at this time.
<@jflory7:fedora.im>
14:28:19
+1
<@jflory7:fedora.im>
14:28:44
Emma [it/its]: Not sure if the Nix mark is a registered trademark in the United States or a European jurisdiction?
<@jonatoni:fedora.im>
14:28:56
+1
<@jflory7:fedora.im>
14:28:56
Trademarks `!=` copyright licenses like Creative Commons
<@emma:rory.gay>
14:29:08
good question, let me research that
<@pbokoc:fedora.im>
14:29:26
+1
<@jspaleta:fedora.im>
14:29:41
+1
<@jflory7:fedora.im>
14:29:44
Jef Spaleta, mhroncok?
<@churchyard:fedora.im>
14:29:49
+1
<@jflory7:fedora.im>
14:31:16
OK. Since this ticket is open for three years, I am going to notate this agreement and close the ticket. We have five +1 votes, and I think others like bookwar, Akashdeep Dhar, dcantrell, ryanlerch, Peter Boy (ServerWG, Docs), etc. can object if they feel strongly
<@jflory7:fedora.im>
14:31:57
!agreed (`+5`/`0`/`-0`) After receiving input from Red Hat Legal and the recommendation given to the trademark counsel at Red Hat/IBM, we agree to reject the change to the Fedora logo licensing because it creates ambiguity and has a messy intersection with trademark law, which is not as "settled" matter for open source like copyright law. Since the relicensing of the logos does not have a discernible impact on our outputs, deliverables, or work as the Fedora Project, we reject this proposal for changing the licensing of the Fedora logo assets at this time.
<@jflory7:fedora.im>
14:32:28
!info Although we are missing all Council members in this meeting, the ticket will be closed now due to three years of no updates, questions, and objections by other Council members.
<@jflory7:fedora.im>
14:32:37
I'll close the ticket after the meeting with an explanation
<@emma:rory.gay>
14:32:40
its owned by the foundation but actually registering the trademarks is still a WIP, but the plan appears to be to get EU, US and UK trademarks for both Nix and NixOS - the branding guidelines does not mention any given license it seems
<@jflory7:fedora.im>
14:32:53
!action @jflory7 Close Ticket #460 with an explanation
<@t0xic0der:fedora.im>
14:33:13
Timezones are tough. Esp. with DST.
<@t0xic0der:fedora.im>
14:33:13
Sorry for being late. I was expecting this meeting to begin in like 28 more minutes from now.
<@t0xic0der:fedora.im>
14:33:15
!hi
<@jflory7:fedora.im>
14:33:22
Emma [it/its]: Good to know! I'll be curious to see how Nix ends up handling it if they get the trademarks registered. Trademarks and copyright don't always play nicely together.
<@zodbot:fedora.im>
14:33:23
Akashdeep Dhar (t0xic0der) - he / him / his
<@jflory7:fedora.im>
14:33:26
Hey Akashdeep Dhar!
<@jflory7:fedora.im>
14:33:36
Akashdeep Dhar: Do you have the Google Calendar invite? 🤔
<@jflory7:fedora.im>
14:33:42
Wondering if you get that reminder or not
<@t0xic0der:fedora.im>
14:33:46
I do. The one from Aoife.
<@emma:rory.gay>
14:34:03
"Registering the NixOS trademark" - https://github.com/NixOS/foundation/issues/46
<@emma:rory.gay>
14:34:03
"Agree on a trademark policy" - https://github.com/NixOS/foundation/issues/36
<@emma:rory.gay>
14:34:03
<@emma:rory.gay>
14:34:03
if it's something you wanted to subscribe to :)
<@jflory7:fedora.im>
14:34:04
Akashdeep Dhar: It appears as now or in 30 minutes for you? It appears as now for me but want to make sure what you see
<@jflory7:fedora.im>
14:34:11
Aoife set me as an editor for the event
<@t0xic0der:fedora.im>
14:34:20
26 minutes from now.
<@jflory7:fedora.im>
14:34:29
Oof, maybe she did not set me correctly 🙂
<@jflory7:fedora.im>
14:34:34
OK, will look at that later.
<@t0xic0der:fedora.im>
14:34:42
Yeah, it can be solved later.
<@emma:rory.gay>
14:34:49
anyways, i gotta get back to work, good luck with the meeting o/
<@jflory7:fedora.im>
14:34:50
!action @jflory7 Recreate Aoife's calendar invite for Council meeting due to time zone issues not syncing
<@jflory7:fedora.im>
14:34:56
Thanks, see ya!
<@jspaleta:fedora.im>
14:35:03
I have to take an action to get the calendar fixed up. We are all going to have to reimport the calendar to fix the daylight time saving drift at some point.
<@t0xic0der:fedora.im>
14:35:08
Those are here to stay anyway...
<@t0xic0der:fedora.im>
14:35:08
Don't wanna derail the discussion because of the scheduling problems.
<@jflory7:fedora.im>
14:35:13
!topic Ticket #555: Council Strategy Summit 2026 – 2-6 February 2026 – Tirana, Albania
<@jflory7:fedora.im>
14:35:18
!link https://forge.fedoraproject.org/council/tickets/issues/555
<@jflory7:fedora.im>
14:35:30
!halp No Fedora Magazine article is published to summarize the Summit.
<@jflory7:fedora.im>
14:35:46
!halp No new tickets are opened in the Council ticket tracker to track our pending action items from the Summit.
<@jflory7:fedora.im>
14:36:01
!halp We have not notably advanced the Konflux/Fedora conversation – should we be doing that?
<@jflory7:fedora.im>
14:36:35
!halp We have not notably advanced the nonprofit/external funding entity conversation – should we be doing that?
<@jflory7:fedora.im>
14:37:10
!info Some progress is advancing on the Fedora Verified / membership conversation. Ananya Nalavathu is working on a survey to publish and share with the Fedora community. The deadline for Fedora Council feedback is tomorrow, Thursday, April 9th.
<@jflory7:fedora.im>
14:37:23
!link https://docs.google.com/document/d/1SBrKnVroptjG-UcUcw3fec1zfGRRLTeZBroa6BoS9O8/edit?usp=sharing
<@jflory7:fedora.im>
14:38:06
So, there are a lot of things pending 🙂
<@jflory7:fedora.im>
14:38:22
And I feel that we could be drifting into the red zone of "we got together to talk, we made decisions, and forgot to follow-up"
<@jspaleta:fedora.im>
14:38:25
okay wha do we need to do to start tracking those things?
<@jflory7:fedora.im>
14:38:37
I am focused on Fedora Verified / membership stuff right now.
<@jflory7:fedora.im>
14:38:47
Jef Spaleta: Did you speak with Legal about the fundraising topic and Open Collective?
<@jflory7:fedora.im>
14:39:09
bookwar is the person I wanted to check in with on the Konflux part, but I think we might be missing her too from time zone messiness
<@churchyard:fedora.im>
14:39:17
Maybe a ticket for each?
<@jspaleta:fedora.im>
14:39:19
for the non-profit.. the age verfication stuff took priority with my legal sync.. but next on my list with legal
<@pbokoc:fedora.im>
14:39:20
Tickets in https://forge.fedoraproject.org/council/tickets/issues with actual assignees and deadlines
<@jflory7:fedora.im>
14:39:51
Yes, this is what we need. We were delaying because of Forgejo, but we are in Forgejo now
<@jflory7:fedora.im>
14:40:04
bookwar was going to open a Konflux ticket I think? I forget
<@bookwar:fedora.im>
14:40:09
I am almost here, just finished my previous call
<@jflory7:fedora.im>
14:40:11
Jef Spaleta: A ticket for the fundraising topic is good
<@jspaleta:fedora.im>
14:40:18
konflux... so that's a little tricky... council asked me to do some quiet non public work..which has been done. So now its a matter of getting a policy draft out
<@jflory7:fedora.im>
14:40:29
This ticket will be the evolution of the membership topic: https://forge.fedoraproject.org/council/tickets/issues/557
<@jflory7:fedora.im>
14:40:44
I will likely close that ticket and replace it with a new ticket about Fedora Verified concept development
<@jflory7:fedora.im>
14:40:48
So it is more clear, focused, and actionable
<@bookwar:fedora.im>
14:40:53
I think on the konflux side the next step was for Jef to check the waters. And if everything is ok - we go on with th eticket and messaging
<@bookwar:fedora.im>
14:41:04
Can we say we are good to go?
<@jflory7:fedora.im>
14:41:18
The issue I see is that there is no public tracking of the Konflux bits
<@jflory7:fedora.im>
14:41:32
I know there is behind-the-scenes work to do, but right now, we have no visibility into that as Council
<@jspaleta:fedora.im>
14:41:44
waters checked... need to massage the staw policy language.. but its basically 90% gone enough to be public.
<@jflory7:fedora.im>
14:42:16
bookwar: Which ticket am I remembering that you were going to open?
<@jspaleta:fedora.im>
14:42:17
right so we open a ticket to create a policy and assign me to it?
<@jflory7:fedora.im>
14:42:25
!info +Present: @t0xic0der, @bookwar
<@jflory7:fedora.im>
14:42:47
!action @jspaleta Open a new ticket in Council tickets for the external fundraising / Open Collective exploration topic from the Summit
<@jflory7:fedora.im>
14:43:24
!action @jflory7 Update Ticket #557 with the evolution of the Fedora Verified topic, close that ticket, and open a new ticket to specifically workshop the concept of a Fedora Verified / "membership model" for Fedora
<@jflory7:fedora.im>
14:44:58
We also need the Fedora Magazine article…
<@jflory7:fedora.im>
14:45:20
If nobody is going to raise their hand for that, I will raise my hand and I am going to use AI for this, because my plate is so full already as it is, things are falling all over the floor 🙂
<@jflory7:fedora.im>
14:46:02
If we are okay with a GenAI blog post with human iterations of feedback, then I'll get it done
<@t0xic0der:fedora.im>
14:46:03
I can help review it - But that's the most I can promise right now.
<@bookwar:fedora.im>
14:46:31
So how about I create a ticket, copy the info from the meetup in there and set a task to create a proper concil statement out of it?
<@jflory7:fedora.im>
14:46:33
OK. Reviewing is fine. Since nobody has the time to do the writing, I will recruit my buddy Gemini for the task 😉
<@bookwar:fedora.im>
14:46:44
So how about I create a *public* ticket, copy the info from the meetup in there and set a task to create a proper concil statement out of it?e
<@jflory7:fedora.im>
14:47:11
bookwar: That would be awesome! I can't remember if this is the ticket you were going to open after the Summit, but we forgot since the migration to Forgejo had that bug that only just got fixed
<@t0xic0der:fedora.im>
14:47:17
Justin Wheeler: Feel free to tag me in once your initial drafts are done, then I can help after that.
<@jspaleta:fedora.im>
14:47:20
let me sync with you right after this meeting. I want to make sure the initial text we put in has the suggested edits.
<@jflory7:fedora.im>
14:47:58
!action @jflory7 Use GenAI to write a Fedora Magazine summary of the Council Strategy Summit 2026 meeting, summarizing the main discussions, the feedback from Fedora Discussion, and our key, next steps that the community can expect to hear from the Fedora Council
<@jflory7:fedora.im>
14:48:40
!action @bookwar Open a new Fedora Council ticket on the Konflux/Fedora topic, copying the info discussed from the Summit with the goal/deliverable of creating a proper, public Fedora Council statement on Konflux
<@churchyard:fedora.im>
14:48:45
Side track: Is it worth having that article on magazine?
<@jflory7:fedora.im>
14:49:07
!action @jspaleta Sync with @bookwar on the Konflux ticket text and framing the initial ticket
<@jflory7:fedora.im>
14:49:33
mhroncok: A good question, but yes. I think a pure summary/recap is less useful, but I think we need to start building a narrative around what we planned to have done by/at Flock
<@jflory7:fedora.im>
14:49:49
I want people to know where we are going, what is coming, and how they can participate/influence the process
<@jflory7:fedora.im>
14:50:04
Purely hashing off what we discussed two months ago seems less practically useful IMHO?
<@churchyard:fedora.im>
14:50:13
it seems more like a community blog thing to me, but It's not a strong opinion
<@jflory7:fedora.im>
14:50:18
Oh, hmmm
<@jflory7:fedora.im>
14:50:24
OK, yeah, could go either way
<@jflory7:fedora.im>
14:50:29
I guess it depends who we want to see this especially
<@jflory7:fedora.im>
14:50:41
It is definitely a contributor-focused content, but I wonder if the wider world be interested
<@jflory7:fedora.im>
14:50:58
For instance, if we wanted LWN to maybe pick this up, Magazine might be better. But maybe LWN is not our goal here, the community is
<@jflory7:fedora.im>
14:51:18
Curious what others think?
<@jflory7:fedora.im>
14:51:20
I am really on the fence
<@jflory7:fedora.im>
14:51:36
The audiences are different, plus CommBlog stuff goes straight to Fedora Discussion too
<@t0xic0der:fedora.im>
14:51:57
Yeah, if we want the community to influence/participate in the process and not LWN (I mean, they're welcome to) let's stick to Commblog
<@jflory7:fedora.im>
14:51:57
Thoughts?
<@churchyard:fedora.im>
14:52:04
I am also pretty sure LWM picks up stuff from the commblog as well
<@jflory7:fedora.im>
14:52:35
For now, although an LWN editor weighed in our discussion to migrate off WordPress to Discourse for CommBlog. They were not a fan 😄 But for now, it is still WordPress blog workflow…
<@t0xic0der:fedora.im>
14:52:40
LWN etc. are media so they should be able to find things on Commblog too.
<@t0xic0der:fedora.im>
14:52:40
Plus, for folks who want to find stuff. They would find stuff out anyway.
<@jflory7:fedora.im>
14:53:32
!agreed Community Blog likely seems like the better choice for an update on the Strategy Summit. Likely will publish there instead of the Fedora Magazine, to make sure we hit the most important, most critical audience — our community!
<@jflory7:fedora.im>
14:54:13
An aside, but sometimes I wonder if people think I use AI when they see me use em dashes, but I want to assert that I have used em dashes LONG before GenAI corrupted them as a telltale sign of AI 😄 So, hmm! 😛
<@jflory7:fedora.im>
14:54:28
Alright, so six minutes left on the clock for the meeting…
<@jflory7:fedora.im>
14:54:36
I think the pending actions cover the Strategy Summit
<@jflory7:fedora.im>
14:54:49
If we get those tickets opened and blog post written, Ticket #555 is good as done
<@jflory7:fedora.im>
14:55:06
Anything else on the Summit that is worth discussing?
<@jflory7:fedora.im>
14:55:28
I mean, I guess we could start talking 2027, but hey, I'll think we get through the actions from 2026 first before opening that can of worms 😂
<@jflory7:fedora.im>
14:55:36
## Strategy Summit follow-ups, going once…
<@jflory7:fedora.im>
14:56:00
## Strategy Summit follow-ups, going twice…
<@jflory7:fedora.im>
14:56:15
## Strategy Summit follow-ups, going thrice…
<@jflory7:fedora.im>
14:56:30
🎬️
<@jflory7:fedora.im>
14:56:40
!topic Open Floor
<@jflory7:fedora.im>
14:57:06
So, the third ticket that we did triage was #557, about the Join SIG / elections topic, but I think it will be handled as part of the new ticket I will open on Fedora Verified, and the membership model
<@jflory7:fedora.im>
14:57:13
So, I think we covered it as part of Ticket #555
<@jflory7:fedora.im>
14:57:44
Not sure if anyone did want to bring up something specific about the elections topic, but otherwise, if not, just make sure to get your feedback into the Google Doc ASAP! My intern is putting together the LimeSurvey survey now, and it will go live next Tuesday!
<@jflory7:fedora.im>
14:57:52
!link https://docs.google.com/document/d/1SBrKnVroptjG-UcUcw3fec1zfGRRLTeZBroa6BoS9O8/edit?usp=sharing
<@jflory7:fedora.im>
14:58:09
!halp Council members, please review the survey questions and draft before the end of tomorrow, Thursday 9 April!
<@t0xic0der:fedora.im>
14:58:27
Put some suggestions yesterday. More or less about the vague messaging of it all, assuming this is the Fedora Verified survey thingy.
<@jflory7:fedora.im>
14:58:45
Akashdeep Dhar: Thanks, I saw you and dcantrell in there!
<@jflory7:fedora.im>
14:59:12
It is clear that more opening context is needed on what the program is. However, keep in mind the goal is not to present something fully-baked yet
<@jflory7:fedora.im>
14:59:20
We are trying to gauge community sentiment on concepts and ideas
<@jflory7:fedora.im>
14:59:32
But there are some key problems we want this to address, and I think those should be underlined a bit more
<@jflory7:fedora.im>
14:59:47
The survey will have a companion article on the CommBlog too, and it will describe the context and then prime people to take the survey
<@jflory7:fedora.im>
15:00:01
This is the plan Ananya and I discussed this morning as we started to look through the feedback
<@t0xic0der:fedora.im>
15:00:04
I do not see that stated in there, but hey - we can change that 😉
<@t0xic0der:fedora.im>
15:00:04
Then we should put that in. Tell people explicitly that we ARE looking for opinions and thoughts.
<@jflory7:fedora.im>
15:00:24
Yeah, we will reframe the opening of the survey a bit more to make that much clear
<@jflory7:fedora.im>
15:00:35
Alright folks, we reached the end of the hour.
<@pboy:fedora.im>
15:00:42
No access 😉
<@jflory7:fedora.im>
15:00:43
Time to yield the room for what comes next.
<@jflory7:fedora.im>
15:01:00
Peter Boy (ServerWG, Docs): Fixed now! I think.
<@jflory7:fedora.im>
15:01:11
I'll work on getting a public summary up on Fedora Discussion from today.
<@jflory7:fedora.im>
15:01:21
See y'all around in the Fedora-verse! Thanks for your time and attention! 👋
<@t0xic0der:fedora.im>
15:01:23
Justin Wheeler: thanks for chairing
<@t0xic0der:fedora.im>
15:01:23
See you folks around!
<@jflory7:fedora.im>
15:01:23
!endmeeting