18:31:35 #startmeeting docs 18:31:35 Meeting started Wed Sep 21 18:31:35 2022 UTC. 18:31:35 This meeting is logged and archived in a public location. 18:31:35 The chair is darknao. Information about MeetBot at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Zodbot#Meeting_Functions. 18:31:35 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 18:31:35 The meeting name has been set to 'docs' 18:31:41 #topic Roll call 18:31:47 .hi 18:31:47 .hi 18:31:48 darknao: darknao 'Francois Andrieu' 18:31:51 pboy: pboy 'Peter Boy' 18:35:18 so we are only 2 today? 18:35:54 Seems to be, not exactly crowded today 18:36:16 pboy do you want to proceed or shall we postpone to next week? 18:36:59 I think, we should let the meeting open for at least 15 mins. 18:37:50 And regard next meeting, I will probably not be able to attend next Wednesday. 18:38:26 But for sure in 2weeks again! 18:43:55 I would like to know how I can continue with our new pages. 18:44:03 But that might be more comfortable with e-mail than here with one-liners - if you don't mind. 18:44:42 ok so I propose to still go over all the topics, in case there is anything we need to brings up, and if there is nothing to say, it'll just be a short meeting :) 18:44:56 OK 18:45:11 #chair pboy darknao 18:45:11 Current chairs: darknao pboy 18:45:12 let's go 18:45:16 #topic Agenda 18:45:23 #link https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/docs-meeting-agenda-2022-09-21/42582 18:45:25 #info Announcements 18:45:27 #info Action item followup 18:45:29 #info ankursinha’s improvements for the preview.sh/build.sh 18:45:31 #info How to proceed with Release Notes Fedora 37 18:45:33 #info Discussion of the Fesco ticket regarding release notes 18:45:35 #info Status variant-orientated docs plan 18:45:37 #info Additional repo ownership of “Fedora Linux Workstation and Spins User Guide” 18:45:39 #info Maintenance strategy for “Fedora Linux Workstation and Spins User Guide” 18:45:41 #topic Announcements 18:45:53 #info Some F36 release notes still need to be written https://pagure.io/fedora-docs/release-notes/roadmap/F36 18:45:55 #info F37 Beta has been released! 18:45:57 #info We use GitLab to track work: https://gitlab.com/groups/fedora/docs/-/boards 18:46:19 no other announcements? 18:46:30 nope 18:46:33 #topic Previous action items 18:46:38 #info none! 18:46:50 #topic ankursinha’s improvements for the preview.sh/build.sh 18:47:07 #link https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/improved-build-script-for-doc-repos-with-change-detection/40920/11 18:47:45 I basically appreciate the work 18:48:03 But don't know about the technical details 18:48:10 it looks fine to me 18:48:39 OK, what are the next steps needed? 18:49:09 I'll review the MR later this week, but I don't think there will be anything to add to it. Looks good. 18:49:21 OK. 18:49:40 the other proposal was about building a RPM to distribute this script 18:49:44 It would be nice to get information about how to update the pagure repos. 18:49:48 I like that idea 18:50:04 I'm fine with it, too 18:50:25 but, that's only working for Fedora users, while the current script can be used on any distribution, even MacOS 18:51:02 OK, I use MacOS and would like to use it as well. :-) 18:51:26 so should we keep both? but in that case, I'm not sure the RPM will solve anything as we'll still have to maintain the script in all git repos 18:51:44 So we need at least 2 distribution methods? 18:52:45 I've no idea how things are packaged on mac 18:53:24 I'm not sure, too. But I think it is too much effort. 18:53:42 we should enable all repos to get it. 18:54:06 and honestly, in this specific case, I'm not sure if it is worth working on updating every repo with that script 18:54:28 I mean, the new script is nice, but it's not a hard requirement either to build the doc 18:54:37 Probably not every repo, but those who are active? 18:54:52 Or those, who would like to have it? 18:55:13 I think, the repo owner should do the work. 18:55:20 so if doc maintainers want to use it, they are more than welcome to update it, but otherwise, I think we should just focus on our own repos for starter 18:55:32 exactly 18:55:53 OK, but we should provide the information somewhere. 18:56:09 E.g. I would really like to use it with our server repo. 18:56:53 And we also need the new graphics 18:57:10 graphics UI, I mean 18:57:49 so usually, everything related to doc repo is comming from the template repository. That's basically the upstream. 18:58:31 OK. So we should describe somewhere how to do the update. 18:58:35 so all the new stuff are used there, and you can just use whatever is in this repo to update yours. 18:59:10 OK, I'll have a look and ask questions if I don't understand it. 18:59:49 for the updated UI, the repo for it is here: https://gitlab.com/fedora/docs/docs-website/ui-bundle and the readme have the required documentation to set it up 19:00:23 Thanks, I'll try it. 19:02:12 .hello py0xc3 19:02:13 py0xc3[m]: py0xc3 'Christopher Klooz' 19:02:18 (but only for 10 minutes) 19:02:30 should we agree on the script deployment? or address this next time when more people are here? 19:02:44 oh hey py0xc3[m] :) 19:02:47 I think, next time 19:02:52 good evening :) 19:02:55 to be honest 19:03:03 alright, let's move on then 19:03:11 py0xc3[m]. Good morning. :-) 19:03:15 #topic How to proceed with Release Notes Fedora 37 19:03:54 I think we need someone who takes care of it. 19:04:09 So I have no opinion on this, I think it's too late for F37 to change anything. I assume we will do just like the previous version 19:04:30 Yes, in is too late for any change. 19:05:05 We can just let it go and look what the result is, or we finde someone to care 19:05:32 I've tried to write a few last week, so I think I could help a little for F37 19:06:24 Some are easier than other depending on how much details there are in the change proposal in the wiki 19:06:33 Good, but I think we need nevertheless someonw who oversees the complete process? I can't, and you probably neither 19:07:14 Would pbokoc take it? 19:07:33 yeah I guess that depends what kind of changes this is about 19:07:58 Hm, we don't know 19:07:59 for something about a version bump, it's quite easy to write the changelog 19:08:16 Oh crap, I didn't realize it was that time again 19:08:28 Yeah I'll oversee it 19:08:36 Oh, welcome! 19:08:45 hi pbokoc :) 19:08:52 Hello :) 19:08:52 Welcome pbokoc 19:09:18 We are discussin rel notes 37. 19:09:44 pbokoc Would you take care for it? 19:09:55 of it? 19:10:02 pboy, Yeah, I know. Yes, I'll do it 19:10:09 Great !!! 19:10:39 I think we can agree that for F37 we keep it as usual, and we will see what we can do to improve the process for F38 19:10:50 Agreed darknao 19:11:04 me too 19:11:31 and that a good transition to the next topic 19:12:10 #topic Discussion of the Fesco ticket regarding release notes 19:12:28 #link https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2868 19:13:20 For the time being we should just discuss. If I got everything right 19:13:38 or if we have to korrect something 19:14:07 Otherwise, we can only wait and see. I suppose 19:16:42 well, I have nothing to add here. We can wait a bit more, the ticket is relatively new anyway 19:16:54 OK 19:17:24 next one is... 19:17:29 #topic Status variant-orientated docs plan 19:18:36 I think I had something to do this week, but didn't :/ 19:18:57 ie. setting up the staging environment 19:19:12 will do that later today 19:19:15 Unfortunately, I have to go already :( I'll check the log later. See you around! 19:19:36 Sorry see you later 19:19:38 see you next time py0xc3[m] 19:20:03 darknao yes. I plan to start on the weekend it possible. 19:20:38 ok it'll be ready by then 19:20:47 Thanks! 19:20:59 any other update on this topic? 19:21:05 not yet 19:21:25 #topic Additional repo ownership of “Fedora Linux Workstation and Spins User Guide” 19:21:48 #link https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/docs-meeting-agenda-2022-09-21/42582/4 19:22:11 Besides the ownership, do we know if it is about the labs as well? 19:24:02 I suppose, I don't get it what the problem exactly is. 19:24:45 I don't see anything related to Labs, but I think only py0xc3 is able to answer that 19:25:17 Regarding labs, indeed, I'll ask him 19:26:16 about the issue, now that the repo is hosted in the Fedora namespace, py0xc3 lose owner/maintener access to it and there is a few things he cannot do anymore 19:26:46 Regarding maintenance of the pages, if he is our main maintainer, can't he get commit priviliges? 19:26:50 I've no objection giving him owner or maintainer perms on it, assuming I can do that 19:27:27 I've neither. I'm lucky he takes the initiative. 19:28:21 ok, just added him as owner of the repo 19:28:32 OK1 19:28:44 very quickly, last topic 19:28:49 #topic Maintenance strategy for “Fedora Linux Workstation and Spins User Guide” 19:29:06 #link https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/docs-meeting-agenda-2022-09-21/42582/4 19:30:06 Is it about maintenance or licensing? 19:30:13 I didn't read the maintener.md in the repo yet, and since we're close to the end, I propose to postpone this topic to the next meeting 19:30:23 #link https://gitlab.com/fedora/docs/fedora-linux-documentation/fedora-linux-workstation-spins-guide/-/blob/main/MAINTAINER.md 19:30:24 agreed 19:30:53 ok, so that's it! 19:31:10 thank you everyone, and see you all next week 19:31:20 darknao++ 19:31:20 pboy: Karma for darknao changed to 1 (for the current release cycle): https://badges.fedoraproject.org/tags/cookie/any 19:31:21 #endmeeting