19:31:13 #startmeeting docs 19:31:13 Meeting started Wed Dec 14 19:31:13 2022 UTC. 19:31:13 This meeting is logged and archived in a public location. 19:31:13 The chair is darknao. Information about MeetBot at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Zodbot#Meeting_Functions. 19:31:13 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 19:31:13 The meeting name has been set to 'docs' 19:31:25 #topic Roll call 19:31:28 #chair pboy darknao pbokoc py0xc3[m] 19:31:28 Current chairs: darknao pbokoc pboy py0xc3[m] 19:31:31 .hi 19:31:32 pboy: pboy 'Peter Boy' 19:31:55 Hello 19:32:25 .hello hankuoffroad 19:32:26 hankuoffroad[m]: hankuoffroad 'None' 19:32:31 Hi 19:32:41 hi all 19:34:18 Hi everyone! 19:34:26 let's start 19:34:29 #topic Agenda 19:34:36 #link https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/docs-meeting-agenda-2022-12-14/44859 19:34:39 #info Announcements 19:34:41 #info Quick docs update 19:34:43 #info Open Floor 19:34:44 #topic Announcements 19:34:54 #info Old Fedora docs (anything older than F26) have been retired. 19:34:57 #info New version of Docs UI has been deployed. See the list of improvements here: 19:34:59 #link https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/discussing-fedora-docs-website-improvement/36600/34 19:35:02 #info AsciiDoc for Fedora documentation has been updated, check it out: 19:35:05 #link https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fedora-docs/contributing-docs/asciidoc-markup/ 19:35:07 #info Next milestone is F38 (2023-04-18) 19:35:10 #info We use GitLab to track work: https://gitlab.com/groups/fedora/docs/-/boards 19:35:20 anything else to mention? 19:36:32 ok, moving on to the main topic then 19:36:45 #topic Quick docs update 19:37:56 Well, question is, where we are. 19:38:06 #link https://pagure.io/fedora-docs/quick-docs/issues 19:38:43 I think: 19:38:55 #link https://pagure.io/fedora-docs/quick-docs/issue/525 19:39:37 is the easiest. Does there anybody objects to remove that article? (I already did, but we can frevert) 19:40:05 I took one myself to rewrite Finding and installing Linux applications - link here https://pagure.io/fedora-docs/quick-docs/issue/521 19:40:43 I had one ticket merged. I'll took another and will continue with that. 19:41:02 regarding the iptables one, I have no objection in removing it. Users should use firewalld instead. 19:41:07 hankuoffroad[m] yeah, that's the question about partials 19:42:10 pboy: Beyond me. Anyone? 19:42:15 Hm, pagure is quite slow, actually 19:43:31 hankuoffroad[m] My internal translator hangs. :-) wha do you mean? 19:44:44 regarding #525 / iptables. I'll close it then. 19:45:38 hankuoffroad[m]: regarding partials, you want to know how to edit them? 19:46:28 Yes, I'm willing to learn that one at a time :) 19:46:51 or how to link to them? (you can't do that, partials are not document, it's just snippets that can be included in other pages) 19:47:11 how to refer back to the original text 19:47:37 They look more scary than code blocks. 19:48:04 If you could send me some links afterwards, I'll digest them 19:48:41 the partials used here are just adoc files like any others: https://pagure.io/fedora-docs/quick-docs/blob/main/f/modules/ROOT/pages/_partials/con_package-management-in-fedora.adoc 19:48:42 I am considering whether we should integrate the partials, at least in this case, into the text. It doesn't really make sense to me. 19:49:24 darknao: ok thanks 19:49:35 you can edit them just like regular pages, but without adding any metadata to it like :authors: or :revnumber: 19:50:17 #link https://docs.antora.org/antora/latest/page/partials/ 19:50:56 partials is useful when you want to use the same paragraph at various places in other document 19:51:12 if it's only used once, it's not really worth it 19:51:37 Good to know, I'm well informed now 19:51:46 Same here. Cheers. 19:52:09 darknao yes, I think at least in this case it is not reusable. 19:52:54 yes we should not overuse them, as it make reviewing the global document harder 19:53:57 OK If hankuoffroad[m] thinks it's easier or better to bring the partials back into the main text, he should do it. 19:54:07 note that partials can be anything and not only asciidoc, or full paragraph of text 19:54:33 it can just be a small piece of code block that you use several time in the same document 19:55:37 Make sense, thanks pboy darknao 19:55:54 OK e #522 / grub 2 19:56:14 AnthonyMcGlone[m What do you think about my assessment that this is a guide rather than a howtio? 19:57:02 I concur with that assessment. 19:57:18 +1 19:57:55 There was one thing I didn't understand. Moving it to "tools - administration". Is that in a different guide somewhere? 19:58:05 OK, then that would be a candidate for moving to the admin tools box. 19:58:14 Oh, too slow 19:58:20 I have one question about this page 19:58:30 AnthonyMcGlone[m> It a different systematic location. 19:58:41 not related to the content, but to the format 19:58:42 darknao go on 20:00:51 I think this page is too long. What do you think about splitting it in a few small pages within the same "group"? For this kind of pages, we can enable pagination to make it easy for readers to parse it 20:01:19 I think when the Table of Contents is too big to fit your screen, that probably mean the page is too long 20:01:55 darknao +1! If we move it to the tools guide, we should reformat it. A big yes, it is too long. 20:02:19 maybe we should say something like that in our future style guide 20:02:20 And that is a problem for readability and positive UX 20:02:43 I remember one page about rpm that we have here, it's way to long for anyone to read it 20:03:10 Yes, I'm planning a text about quality and type of articles: hot-to, tutorial, guide, .... 20:03:31 It goes back to worl of Anuschka Jain, our former intern. 20:03:43 I sometimes break down long docs into "this is how to use it" and "this is how it works," which are very different things. 20:03:54 And yes, with the rom article it is the same. 20:04:00 https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/ for instance 20:04:43 Oh, that's even worse. 20:05:25 It badly needs improvement of readeability. :-) 20:05:54 AlanBowman[m]. +! 20:06:59 AnthonyMcGlone[m you said you would pick up another one. Do you already know, which one? 20:07:26 Yes, issue #522 just mentioned. 20:07:47 Background: I want to ask on user list, if someone would help us with an article noone of us picks up 20:09:11 OK, so we nobody for #524 so far? 20:10:45 OK, no one calls „me", I will try it with this on user list. 20:11:02 I have one last topic I wanted to bring up regarding quick docs before the end of the meeting 20:11:21 and that is about the category/tag system 20:11:28 OK, I'm finished with my questions 20:11:56 darknao yes, I forgot. 20:12:10 I think we should "curate" a set of categories that writers can use for their quick-docs 20:12:57 for now, it's pretty much free for all, and it may become quickly out of hand if we let writers choose their own category names 20:13:16 darknao yes, I would like to combine a curated list (categories) with a open list (tags) 20:13:23 +1 20:13:44 For categories, we could start with the navigation items. 20:13:46 are we going to limit the number of tags an article can get? 20:14:17 darknao I'm not sure, but I think that would be necessary, just in case. 20:14:27 btw, this is how category/tags looks on articles right now 20:14:28 * darknao[m] uploaded an image: (347KiB) < https://libera.ems.host/_matrix/media/v3/download/fedora.im/0fd63b0aa8f91343f2055fd94727ef0e6818d972/image.png > 20:15:05 green is the category, blue are the tags 20:15:20 darknao that's perfect ! 20:15:37 that'll do 20:15:38 clicking those tags/category will bring you to the category page with all the linked articles 20:15:48 Probably a new line between categories and tags? 20:16:17 I can do that 20:16:35 And maybe a bit more white space between toc and the categories? 20:16:57 The link makes it even better! 20:18:35 I hope I can manage to start a guide: How to write a Quick Doc article this week. 20:18:56 one last thing 20:19:26 I remember you wanted to get rid of the navigation tree, and use category instead 20:19:50 Yes, it's a suggestion of aday for a new design. 20:20:06 does that mean that you want to remove the right navigation menu and only keep the category/tags on the left? 20:20:30 or just replacing the navigation tree by a list of categories or something else? 20:20:44 haven't thought through the details yet. 20:21:19 ok, I don't need an answer today :) but just wondering how we want to be able to browse the quick docs 20:21:35 I would love to get @adoc to collaborate. He had I the thread ideas that I liked very much. 20:21:50 like search oriented, or change the landing page to display all categories, or ...? 20:22:32 There was a thread about docs design, some weeks ago. I don't find it at the moment. 20:22:59 months ago* 20:23:03 #link https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/fedora-docs-design-work/40062 20:23:42 Yes, I mean that. :-) 20:23:57 whether weeks, or months, who cares ? :-) 20:24:07 That looks neat 20:25:16 A key point was: no central, rigid navigation, everything more fluid and to be seen in multiple perspectives. 20:25:48 And short texts, all independent of each other. 20:26:52 The fancy term for that is "every page is page one." 20:27:07 There is actually a book about that concept by the same name. 20:27:17 OK, we should block any numer > 1 20:27:26 numer -> number 20:27:32 :-) 20:28:11 AlanBowman[m]. Do you have a link? 20:29:31 https://everypageispageone.com/the-book/ 20:29:45 Thanks! 20:29:54 I don't 100% agree with him on this, but it's a common topic in docs circles. 20:30:13 I saw him give a talk on it at a conference in...2012, I think. 20:30:55 Added to my winter reading list 20:31:05 At least, looks interesting 20:31:31 alright, thanks everyone for today, this was a great meeting :) 20:31:55 thanks 20:32:06 #endmeeting