15:38:36 #startmeeting docs.fp.o status check 15:38:36 Meeting started Mon Aug 11 15:38:36 2014 UTC. The chair is randomuser. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 15:38:36 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 15:38:39 sorry :) 15:38:46 let's recap first 15:38:47 * randomuser winks 15:38:53 oki 15:39:25 we've got a basic mockup, and it's in css, too 15:39:36 #meetingname docs.fp.o status check 15:39:36 The meeting name has been set to 'docs.fp.o_status_check' 15:40:12 yep 15:40:14 link? 15:40:21 i've found what needs to be fixed in the html files (at least i hope i have) 15:40:41 https://rkratky.fedorapeople.org/docsweb/mockup/en-US/index.html 15:40:54 it's pretty much the same as last time 15:41:03 with yruseva's touches 15:41:16 it reflows nicely 15:41:21 sh's got two more tho 15:41:27 yes 15:41:31 ...she's... 15:41:31 but 15:41:34 i like to put two windows side by side and the old site doesn't play nice with that 15:41:51 what I need is basically a better understanding over what we're fighting for :) 15:42:11 however, we have a big question... 15:42:23 okay... 15:43:03 shall I say it, at least from my side? :) 15:43:37 * yruseva needs a brief refresh 15:43:50 the publican-generated site is kinda unwieldy... how about we create a nice and simple landing site and relegate the publican stuff (vanilla) to a sub-site - just for docs display? 15:44:14 * yruseva nods 15:45:23 well, i'm concerned that it might be more of a maintenance burden that way, since publican is rebuilding the TOC every time we publish 15:45:45 or are you thinking more of a splash.html that you'd click through? 15:46:10 yes, but don't really need the toc on the landing site, do we? 15:46:31 how will people navigate to documents without it? 15:46:59 i'm thinking a static page that'd link to the publican-generated toc 15:47:04 * randomuser will brb, coffee refill required 15:48:20 I am not sure about the back-end, my concern was that having a whole guide framed into the website is a bit odd - if only for style reasons 15:49:55 okay, back (still brewing, argh) 15:50:28 A splash page sounds fine to me - we can just tell the server to default to $file.html instead of index.html 15:51:06 this doesn't replace the index with the TOC though, if I understand you correctly 15:52:07 yruseva, you're talking about the current landing page copy ? 15:52:31 it doesn't, but that's fine. i'd leave the toc index unchanged, plain publican 15:53:37 randomuser, I think so.. 15:53:38 coz, the publican brand -- whatever it will be in the future -- will never really fit in with our fedora-styled web 15:54:11 * randomuser nods 15:54:22 * yruseva nods 15:54:40 yeah, i know what you mean - it *might* be feasible to get it more like the other sites, but not without a lot of work 15:55:13 If you want to build a landing page, I'm all for it 15:55:24 so, i thought it might be easier (both maintenance-wise and on the eyes) to separate the actual docs from the website of the docs team 15:56:03 Like, some quick links, welcome copy, and a "click here for all guides" somewhere? 15:56:15 exactly 15:56:46 rkratky, have you looked at the publican sqlite db? 15:57:01 if you wanted to get really ambitious, you could build a toc from that 15:57:24 from a distance... i got confused pretty fast 15:57:47 ok, let's table that idea 15:58:00 heh, it's tempting, but not in our current timeframe 15:58:18 i can work on it in the future and maybe come up with something that's not so entirely embarrasing 15:58:30 s/so// 15:58:57 i think the publican toc is not that bad - it just needs to sit on its own 15:59:16 so we're mostly happy with the CSS for the index as is, and we're adding a splash page 15:59:28 or as you've made it, i mean 16:00:01 i'd even consider removing all changes and leaving it totally plain. 16:00:42 eh.. it's somewhat like other fedora stuff, i don't want to throw that work away 16:01:37 meddling with overrides is eventually going to fall on our heads when a new version of publican comes out, for instance 16:02:52 I'd be surprised if a new version of publican invalidated our brand, though 16:03:15 we haven't really done *any* maintenance to it, or needed to, even publican 2->publican4 16:04:27 i guess, you're right. well, either way, can we talk about what we want/need on the front side? yruseva needs a starting point. 16:04:34 one thing we *should* salvage is the language redirect 16:05:19 you're thinking about landing page design, yruseva ? 16:05:20 language: true that. i was not able to get it working locally at all. 16:05:26 yes, I've got questions about that - like how much do you want to change the menu for the redesign? 16:05:39 like cleaning the categories 16:06:00 yruseva, i'd go for a 'from-scratch' approach 16:06:02 liek Fedora Draft Documentation is unused 16:06:25 we use the draft category 16:06:32 yeah, the cookbook was in there 16:06:43 oh, sorry :) 16:06:55 so, are you planning on revising the categories? 16:07:02 but then again the menu could use a revision 16:07:06 the categories are applied to the docbook source, it's not really a design thing 16:07:08 let's decide what needs to be linked from the landing page 16:07:16 can I use the same 7 ones to play with? 16:07:23 yes 16:07:27 ok 16:07:50 and we have the slideshow, the language drop-down menu.. 16:08:29 the 'fedora contributor documentation' might end up leading to one book that's referring to other content sources, as pkovar is leaning towards 16:08:34 but that's a different conversation 16:08:44 a big "become a writer" button? 16:08:50 aha 16:08:51 +1 16:09:24 putting things like the beginners guide and documentation guide in a separate category, ultimately, is an interesting idea 16:10:15 yruseva, i'm a little lost - rkratky was talking about putting a splash page in front of the current landing page, and you're talking about redesigning the current landing page further? 16:11:01 um, I am using it as a starting point, because I need some content to start with 16:12:04 like I need to know what goes in there :) 16:13:34 ah, sorry, I got your question - yes 16:14:00 for example, I like this one - http://fedoramagazine.org/ 16:14:30 randomuser, I overdosed on coffee again :) 16:14:38 yruseva, that is wordpress 16:14:43 and has a nice stats package 16:14:44 * randomuser gulps down more, trying to catch up 16:15:05 i'm pretty sure we don't want to move to wordpress 16:15:50 yruseva, still a little confused - can you give me some context on what you're looking for? 16:17:12 aaahh 16:17:45 like, what elements we need in the landing/nav page, or in the splash page? 16:18:19 * yruseva thought it was the same thing O.o 16:18:24 randomuser, it's very sexy :P 16:19:10 yes, I wanted to know what elements we need in the landing page - the slideshow, what categories, menus, etc 16:19:30 bexelbie, i think it comes with some issues, iirc fedoramagazine isn't allowed on fp.o infrastructure 16:19:52 ah, ok 16:20:02 yruseva, i thought a new landing page would lead to the nav page 16:20:08 randomuser, I am not proposing a change .. but it would support the idea of thinking in a splash page way as you all are now talking 16:20:59 rkratky, like..what would they have? 16:21:32 * yruseva is lost, too 16:21:52 nav page would be pretty much what we have now. the landing page would be brand new 16:22:24 yruseva, on the nav page, we want to give people a way to navigate to all the documents. I think the breadcrumbs thing at the top isn't really useful, and I'd probably prefer expanding the list of current guides from the list on the left and leaving the primary pane for more descriptive content 16:22:43 but I don't know how much of that we can easily do with publican, or in the given timeframe 16:23:20 as far as i can tell, it looks like what I had anticipated has already been done :/ 16:25:46 aha 16:26:34 one thing that i notice, layout wise, is the a static banner at the top with the logo on fp.o and fedoramagazine 16:26:41 we don't have that bit of whitespace 16:27:20 and, what about the in-document toc, rkratky ? 16:27:53 randomuser, that orks, afaict 16:27:58 works 16:28:33 sure, just curious if you were planning on re-working it 16:29:43 in what way? do you mean the toc at the beginning of books? 16:29:53 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/docs-backend//en-US/Fedora/20/html/Release_Notes/index.html 16:29:59 at the bottom of the page there 16:30:53 yes, i like it the way it is. do you think it needs something? 16:31:25 the theme could be tweaked - maybe - and there's a block element that appears at the top of the page when you expand that doesn't do anything 16:33:06 which element? 16:34:27
a big white box that pushes down the rest of the body 16:34:44 it's child is the actual menu that comes up from the bottom 16:36:26 ...not terribly important, it just doesn't look great 16:36:51 what's our plan of action now, yruseva and rkratky ? 16:37:09 hmm, when i open the page, it's class=visible 16:37:59 randomuser, i'm mostly worried about the existing html 16:38:17 if that doesn't work, all else is secondary 16:38:30 okay, what needs to be done with it? 16:40:18 do you have the staging_site at hand? 16:41:50 I don't, actually, i'm on a work laptop that hasn't been set up for much fp.o access 16:41:59 * randomuser frowns 16:42:14 I'll see how long the battery will hold out on mine 16:45:15 oka, i'm in, rkratky - what am I looking for 16:45:37 en_US/index.html 16:45:53 (or any other lang.) 16:45:57 ok 16:46:11 this file needs db4.css from the main dir. 16:46:55 ah, and there's no link to it 16:47:08 nope 16:48:26 odd, it is referenced in splash.html 16:49:27 i guess that method of loading css doesn't work well :P 16:49:36 i'll look at changing the brand for that 16:50:02 #action randomuser to fix brand so db4.css gets linked from $LANG/index.html 16:50:04 what else? 16:50:05 i'm really suspicious of that 16:50:24 it seems to me strange that nobody would notice before 16:50:59 we haven't played with this stuff in a long, long time i think 16:51:03 first time for me 16:51:26 that's it. tiny. 16:51:48 okay, i can do that 16:52:46 how much more work on the css and landing page layout will you want to do? 16:52:56 (and yeah, i remember you said none :) 16:53:26 it really depends on what yruseva comes up with. 16:53:47 I'll try to keep it simple 16:54:18 my opinion: work on the static landing and leave the publican nav. stuff as it is 16:54:47 alright 16:55:12 in the meantime, if you think of anything else to be added, I'm around in the channel during the week 16:55:46 to recap - the 7 categories, languages drop down menu, some nice big badge "become a writer", .. 16:56:18 yruseva, let's meet to talk about it tomorrow. say 3pm? 16:56:24 well, the new splash page can be whatever you want 16:56:52 rkratky, yep! 16:57:10 randomuser, right, ok 16:57:33 what can I do for now, besides fix the css link? 16:59:54 well, how do we deploy it, once it's ready? 17:00:58 we apply your changes to the relevant packages then push them to koji 17:02:21 and the server grabs whatever it sees in koji 17:03:50 ok, i'm going to have to leave that to you :-) 17:04:49 * yruseva needs to run 17:04:50 sure, just send me the files whenever you're ready for it 17:04:56 anything else I need to know? 17:05:08 yes 17:05:37 we had penciled in this week for deployment - we're pushing that back a week for further redesign now, right? 17:07:14 considering that, wouldn't it be safer to try whether what we have works? 17:07:33 sure 17:07:54 i can't do the deployment off the cuff anyway 17:08:00 if it does, we can screw around some more. if not, it's high time to get it working and the rest can wait 17:08:15 * randomuser nods 17:08:55 is everything in your fedorapeople space, rkratky ? 17:08:55 ok 17:09:06 well, yes 17:09:32 do you want me to push the ovrrides file to the git repo? 17:09:56 which repo? 17:09:59 I'll join back from home ~1h 17:11:07 tools.git 17:11:07 * yruseva looks around 17:11:13 ah, sure 17:11:46 rkratky, you could use tools.git or fedorapeople.org:/srv/groups/docs/ too 17:12:30 didn't know about that one 17:13:23 i'm kinda worried that what works locally will blow up once on the server - is there a way for me to see what it does once it's there? 17:14:31 yeah, it will be at https://admin.fedoraproject.org/docs-backend//en-US/Fedora/index.html 17:15:11 that passes through to docs-backend 17:19:34 Okay, so we have a plan 17:19:44 I'll work on deploying what you share 17:20:12 rkratky, you and yruseva are going to continue the valiant effort to make the thing look better 17:21:05 ok and thanks for the guidance 17:21:28 you're welcome, and thank you! 17:22:18 i pushed the commit. let's see what it does 17:22:21 Good job, guys and gals. 17:23:27 randomuser, i'm usually around fedora-docs, so ping me anytime if it needs fixing 17:23:51 rkratky, cool, I will - and when I have it deployed for you to look at 17:24:13 probably... tomorrow or Wednesday 17:24:21 ok 17:26:46 woohoo, progress! 17:26:53 #endmeeting