15:38:37 #startmeeting Fedora DotNet (2018-03-01) 15:38:37 Meeting started Thu Mar 1 15:38:37 2018 UTC. The chair is Rhea. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 15:38:37 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 15:38:37 The meeting name has been set to 'fedora_dotnet_(2018-03-01)' 15:38:43 #meetingname dotnet 15:38:43 The meeting name has been set to 'dotnet' 15:38:46 #nick dotnet 15:39:05 #chair axeld aslice omajid dkramar 15:39:05 Current chairs: Rhea aslice axeld dkramar omajid 15:39:11 #topic Agenda 15:39:14 #info (1) Roll Call 15:39:24 #info (3) Action items and Tickets 15:39:29 #topic Roll Call 15:39:36 #topic Roll CallIf this is your first time at a DotNet meeting, feel free to introduce yourself to everyone and say hello! If anyone has any questions before we get started with the rest of the agenda, now is also a good time to ask. 15:39:39 #action dotnet New members, make sure you introduce yourself on the DotNet mailing list [ https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/DotNet ] 15:39:44 * Rhea waves 15:39:52 .hello aslice 15:39:54 aslice: aslice 'Andrew Slice' 15:39:58 .hello omajid 15:39:59 omajid: omajid 'Omair Majid' 15:40:07 .hello tmds 15:40:08 tmds: tmds 'Tom Deseyn' 15:40:36 dkramar is our new intern at dotnet QE so he'll be helping out with writing some tests and/or other things around dotnet-on-Fedora :] 15:40:40 .hello kus 15:40:41 kus: kus 'kushal hada' 15:40:55 #chair tmds 15:40:55 Current chairs: Rhea aslice axeld dkramar omajid tmds 15:41:07 .hello amitosh 15:41:08 amitosh: amitosh 'Amitosh Swain Mahapatra' 15:41:08 So welcome dkramar :D 15:41:18 Hi :-D 15:41:28 Howdy dkramar! 15:41:37 hello dkramar (: 15:42:09 Soooo lets take a look at tickets and stuff this week, next week packaging update again... (Since we have only <30 minutes we can alternate.) 15:42:13 hi dkramar! 15:42:19 #topic Action items and Tickets 15:42:27 #link https://pagure.io/fedora-dotnet/issues?tags=meeting 15:42:29 #info How This Works: We look at past #action items from the last meeting for quick follow-up. If a task is completed, we move on to the next one. If it isn't, we get an update and re-action it if needed. If no status, we'll try to get a quick update and move forward. 15:43:26 #info === Unable to build on Fedora 28 due to missing LLDB.h === 15:43:32 #link https://pagure.io/fedora-dotnet/issue/40 15:43:49 omajid: can you give us like a sentence TLDR? 15:44:22 sure. lldb package in fedora has a bug: it doesn't provide the main api header file. so we can't build anything that uses the lldb apis there. 15:44:29 Any idea on the fix time? 15:45:25 i assume it's a simple fix. the header file is present in the sources. i assume it's just not getting installed or some such. i guess it's a question of when people get around to fix it (and how stable fedora 28/rawhide are building the fixes) 15:45:46 hmm 15:46:13 okay, lets hope before F28 gets released *cough cough* 15:46:19 #info === dotnet broken on Fedora 28 due to ncurses 6.1 === 15:46:20 #link https://pagure.io/fedora-dotnet/issue/41 15:46:30 that one is a bit more tricky. 15:46:36 There is a PR to fix this, and is active... 15:46:41 yeah. 15:46:51 but the bigger issues is that unlinke the lldb thing, this is a runtime issue 15:47:02 yup 15:47:12 so unless it gets fixed, we can't run dotnet on fedora, at all. even if it was cross compiled 15:47:38 Anything we can do to help? o.o 15:47:57 basically we can't use our current 2.0 builds, at all. we will need a binary compiled elsewhere, with the fix, to start using dotnet at all. it's a very interesting bug in terms of what it means for packaging 15:48:18 Also for the future, is this something we should have tests for rather earlier than later? (Eventually we will test EVERYTHING!!! uahahaa... don't take me seriously please) 15:49:28 well, we might want to aim to be testing latest dotnet (indevelopment dotnet) + latest fedora (rawhide) all the time 15:50:13 that should help us find bugs (like this one) faster. like, this was known about for a few months, but did not affect fedora 15:50:26 so maybe finding doesn't necessarily mean we can fix it faster. 15:50:57 We have released Fedoras in jenkins 15:51:25 for these sort of issues, we will need unreleased fedoras too, i think 15:51:35 or maybe just building more frequently on copr. 15:52:12 Basically we add new Fedora to our tests when rawhide gets forked 15:52:17 so a little before release 15:52:21 Is that enough? 15:52:26 yeah, that would be pretty good. 15:52:46 for these issues, yeah. 15:53:09 in a way though, for this bug, we tested builds on fedora 28 as soon as it was branched :) 15:53:10 Cause there are actual issues with running rawhide itself if we take it before its forked 15:53:17 branched 15:53:20 whatever, words, english 15:54:26 Okay err.. moving on I guess, the rest of the pagure tickets are about updating websites and stuff 15:54:49 FYI I've updated fedoraloves.net portal, with the proprietary C# VSCode extension info 15:54:56 that we discussed last time 15:55:31 Our wiki is nicely being moved to the docs bit by bit bt0++ amitosh++ :] 15:55:36 Meh no cookies for you! 15:55:42 And that's about it. 15:55:44 :D 15:56:08 Anyone got anything to chat about before we end? 15:56:11 We have 3 minutes left 15:56:18 microsoft released preview1 of 2.1 15:56:43 Oh yep... (Can I just say I so hate the whole "preview" naming...) 15:57:00 Can we actually build 2.1 for F27 at least? 15:57:15 only microsoft can build it atm :( 15:57:29 (╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻ 15:57:30 no. we talked about this with microsoft and source-build is not in a usable shape for 2.1 atm. 15:57:45 omajid: tried building the tarball you gave, went for a coffee and when I saw I had so much errors that the scrollback buffer of Konsole was full 15:57:47 *maybe* next preview, if we are lucky 15:57:48 * Rhea missed last weeks MS meeting... 15:58:02 :/ I don't even know where was the error 15:58:09 omajid: why the hell are they going forward with 2.1 then, if it's not buildable? 15:58:18 They should hold their release and go with open source. 15:58:29 Can I flip this specific table tonight? 15:58:38 amitosh: lol. no worries. we got it for fedora 26 and 27: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/dotnet-sig/dotnet/build/720374/ 15:58:39 (for you tonight == afternoon) 15:59:22 Rhea: they can build it in their custom build-system-way. and we can build the repos from github too. we just can't stitch everything together in sources :( 15:59:50 Oh well... lets try to generate more pressure on MS I guess... 16:00:07 Still same difference... We can't be behind, like what happened last month 16:00:21 (incl rhel, not just fedora) 16:00:51 sorry, i have to step away for another meeting 16:00:55 Yup 16:01:01 See you all later :] 16:01:08 bb all 16:01:27 #endmeeting