#fedora-meeting-2: Env and Stacks (2015-09-10)

Meeting summary

1. Developer portal -- whatever is needed for finalizing (hhorak, 12:04:47)
   1. ttomecek is still waiting to get some stuff merged to Fedora-Dockerfiles (hhorak, 12:09:30)
   2. http://developer.fedorainfracloud.org/ (hhorak, 12:10:11)
   3. https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/4876 (hhorak, 12:10:19)
   4. work still to be done: packaging ruby packages (about 20) (hhorak, 12:11:29)
   5. content that is still missing to be able to deploy the developer portal: docker, devassistant, python, a basic guide for openshift (hhorak, 12:22:43)
   6. IDEA: to have linking to some categories on fedora ask matching the topic on Developer portal, like python, ruby, vagrant.. for example link from Python content could point to ask with python tag (hhorak, 12:24:14)
   7. developer portal should have some link at getfedora.org (hhorak, 12:32:58)
   
   
2. RepoFunnel and the Software Component Pipeline -- any feedback (hhorak, 12:33:39)
   1. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Env_and_Stacks/Projects/SoftwareComponentPipeline (vpavlin, 12:36:12)
   2. https://github.com/ncoghlan/repofunnel (ncoghlan, 12:36:25)
   3. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Env_and_Stacks/Projects/SoftwareComponentPipeline (vpavlin, 12:36:32)
   4. ACTION: everybody look more closely to the SoftwareComponentPipeline proposal and let's provide feedback/additional questions on ML (hhorak, 12:38:45)
   
   
3. User level package management -- looking for AI (hhorak, 12:39:37)
   1. https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/env-and-stacks/2015-August/000884.html (hhorak, 12:41:17)
   2. the perspective on that changed recently, ncoghlan more focusing on *enabling* it better; trusting devs building *on* Fedora to make up their own minds about whether or not to consume upstream package repos directly (hhorak, 12:45:46)
   3. for *distro* components, focus on automating the upstream -> SRPM pipeline and removing any manual steps ; for *custom* apps running *on* Fedora/RHEL/CentOS, provide the tools, provide repo hosting support in Pulp, but don't try to inject ourselves into the package review process (hhorak, 12:48:03)
   4. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Mizdebsk/FedoraMavenRepository (hhorak, 12:53:35)
   
   
4. Open floor? (hhorak, 13:04:18)

Action items

1. everybody look more closely to the SoftwareComponentPipeline proposal and let's provide feedback/additional questions on ML

People present (lines said)

1. hhorak (56)
2. ncoghlan (29)
3. vpavlin (21)
4. asamalik (16)
5. jstribny (15)
6. phracek (9)
7. ttomecek (6)
8. zodbot (4)
9. jkaluza (4)
10. bkabrda (0)
11. juhp (0)
12. walters (0)