20:59:47 #startmeeting EPEL meeting 20:59:47 Meeting started Fri Nov 20 20:59:47 2009 UTC. The chair is nirik. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 20:59:47 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 20:59:54 #namemeeting epel 21:00:07 #meetingname epel 21:00:07 The meeting name has been set to 'epel' 21:00:15 #topic Who's around? 21:00:50 anyone around for an epel meeting? 21:02:15 * nirik guesses not many folks around today. 21:02:24 this meeting may be even more short than normal. ;) 21:03:21 .fas smcbrien 21:03:22 StabbyMc: smcbrien '' 21:03:37 hey StabbyMc. 21:03:52 Hey nirik: long time user of EPEL, first time meeting attendee :-) 21:04:04 welcome. ;) 21:04:07 hello 21:04:09 :) 21:04:15 it's looking like it might be just us... oh wait... there is stahnma. ;) 21:04:30 I half-remembered this time 21:04:48 cool. 21:04:57 Not much at all on agenda today... 21:05:09 #topic next few meetings 21:05:21 I would vote to cancel next week 21:05:30 most people in the US will be on holiday 21:05:34 Next friday is the day after thanksgiving in the US. The friday after that is right around time for Fudcon to start. 21:05:46 * stahnma is not going to FUDcon :( 21:05:56 * nirik isn't going to make it either this time. ;( 21:06:13 yeah, so I say we should cancel both the next 2 and next meeting is dec 11th. 21:06:18 ok 21:06:27 sounds like a plan 21:06:31 +1 21:06:59 I can mail the list for objections too... 21:07:38 ok 21:07:57 #topic Open Floor 21:08:08 I had litterally no other meeting topics... ;) 21:08:22 oh wow 21:08:24 but there could be things. Anything for open floor? anything anyone would like to note or ask about? 21:08:39 I saw some mirorrs out of sync last week 21:08:49 like some had cobbler 1.6 as the latest, others had 2.0 21:08:56 which was odd since I was trying to upgrade 21:09:09 outside of that, I don't have too much 21:09:49 weird. Wonder if it was related to the fedora release syncing? 21:09:53 shouldn't have been... 21:09:59 not really sure 21:10:07 I think it was Monday night 21:10:12 but I could be wrong 21:10:20 either way, i'm over it 21:10:59 I have nothing else 21:11:03 so I guess we close :) 21:11:14 awe, missed it :( 21:11:17 Great first meeting! I like them short :-) 21:11:59 * mmercer wonders what he missed. is at least trying to keep up with the meetings until he can get sponsored =D 21:12:07 yeah, it's hard to have meetings with just: keep making packages! Keep fixing bugs! :0 21:12:24 mmercer: not much. we were talking about canceling next 2 meetings due to holidays. 21:12:45 why not treat the meetings like ways of discussing current bugs that may be causing issues, best practices for packaging and whatnot 21:12:50 and use them to educate newcomers 21:13:27 that's a great idea. ;) 21:13:50 I can try and write up something for that for next meeting? 21:13:56 :) 21:16:01 it would be nice to try and quash or triage bugs... might be ok for a meeting too sometime. 21:16:30 mmercer: you are looking to maintain some epel packages, but awaiting sponsorship? you have packages in for review? 21:17:26 nirik, not yet no. I am goign to talk to the author of one of my favorite things, get permission to package it, and then submit it :) 21:17:46 since i know noone else has this package submittied 21:17:55 bah, im spelling great on 2 hours of sleep, lol 21:17:55 excellent. Feel free to ping me when you submit it, I'd be happy to review... 21:18:32 mmercer, with the holidays people want to spend time with family then the week after is fydcon 21:18:51 anyhow, any other general EPEL stuff anyone would like to bring up? 21:18:51 Southern_Gentlem, nodnod. Im not in a rush, right now work is keeping me way too busy anyway 21:18:56 fudcon 21:20:26 ok, if nothing else I will go ahead and close things out... 21:20:57 hmm.... would a game client package meet the requirements for submission? 21:21:04 ( in this case, Kmuddy ) 21:21:38 or should i choose one that would actually be for *epel* rather than review against the fedora packages 21:21:58 mmercer: if it's able to meet all the fedora guidelines, sure. 21:22:08 if you can maintain it also in fedora that would be desireable. 21:22:08 that it can, from what ive read anyway 21:22:32 im just waiting to talk to the author so he knows its going to be an actual maintained packages for the fedora lines :) 21:23:13 cool. makes sense. 21:24:23 well, thanks for coming folks... any further questions, feel free to ask in #epel or the mailing list? 21:25:10 #endmeeting