16:06:19 #startmeeting EPEL 2010-07-12 16:06:19 Meeting started Mon Jul 12 16:06:19 2010 UTC. The chair is smooge. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 16:06:19 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 16:07:37 ping nirik Jeff_S 16:07:45 * nirik looks up. 16:07:48 #topic Hello 16:07:51 Hi 16:07:51 * Jeff_S looks down 16:07:59 smooge: hi, thanks 16:08:03 sorry I ended up getting caught in something so I am late 16:08:04 'lo 16:08:08 * tremble laughs 16:08:12 I'm here, but there is a insurance inspector that could show up anytime... so might have to wander off to deal with them. 16:08:15 I think dgilmore will be sleeping finally 16:08:19 * tremble had an over-running meeting too. 16:08:28 nirik: "deal" with them? :) do you need an alibi? 16:08:48 ha. :) Honest, I was in an epel meeting... ;) 16:08:50 nirik, is it an BOFH related insurance inspector? IE leading them towards the tape vaults 16:09:05 ok 16:09:35 #topic EL-6 issues 16:09:50 tremble sent out a lot of emails and I think we have a ton of packages in place. 16:10:00 We now have about half our packages built 16:10:04 we also have a lot of people thinking there is supposed to be a mass rebuild that would catch it 16:10:18 tremble sorry you should be talking :) 16:10:22 I have it on my TODO list but haven't built mine yet :) 16:10:34 * tremble grins 16:10:47 * nirik is down to his last 2 16:11:12 A number of people have been held up by other people not having built packages. 16:11:43 The availability of some packages on some arches only has caused issues, I think nirik was having fun with Java too? 16:11:49 smooge: im not sleeping now just a little sick still 16:11:56 have we seen people building the el-5 version on el-6, or are most people taking the opportunity to pull in a newer version from fedora? Or nobody has tracked this? 16:12:10 Jeff_S: we branched from F-12 16:12:10 dgilmore, I am sorry I didn't know you were sick. I thought you were doing 48 hours straight on the koji move 16:12:29 What I've seen, has been people building at least the F-12 version, frequently the rawhide version. 16:12:30 I am needing to get hamster-applet split out for EL-6 16:12:32 There was a yum bug that prevented 'BuildRequires: java-devel >= 1:1.6.0 from working. 16:12:33 Jeff_S: so they would have to go out of there way to build the EL-5 version 16:12:39 dgilmore: ok, so people would have to make changes in order to build the el-5 version... good 16:12:45 dgilmore: thanks 16:13:12 nirik: i updated yum on all the el-6 builderhosts that should be fixed 16:13:23 dgilmore: yep. :) Thanks. 16:13:51 I have another question: Should mock work for el6 builds? I see mock in rawhide has .conf files for it, but they don't work. 16:13:52 cool 16:13:58 there are 8 x86_64 builders running rhel5 and 12 running rhel6 16:14:15 nirik: id be supprised if it works 16:14:23 nirik: i had some configs for beta1 16:14:29 i need to update them for beta2 16:14:46 With regards the rebranching of EL-6 "optional" packages we probably need to make sure that people built from the RH SRPMs at some point. 16:14:59 dgilmore, is there any problem with mock other than configs? 16:15:03 dgilmore: it almost works... it can't get the buildsys-build group 16:15:31 nirik: looks like they pulled in my configs that point at beta1 16:15:39 smooge: just configs 16:15:58 dgilmore: ok. Could you post up the beta2 versions somewhere? and/or get them merged in mock? :) 16:16:05 nirik: but it should work buildsys-build is in the epel comps file 16:16:32 nirik: yeah ill get new configs up and request they get pulled in 16:17:04 dgilmore, cool. 16:17:20 did people see mdomsch's email on packages? 16:18:10 * siXy would like to delay pushing one of his packages to EL-6 even if it misses the deadline if that's ok - major re-write just around the corner, and don't want to fsck with user experiences. It's not a very widely used package anyway 16:18:17 smooge: no, I didn't. To the EPEL list? 16:19:03 I thought it was to the list.. but maybe it was somewhere else. 16:19:04 One sec 16:22:06 EPEL test mass rebuild results from mdomsch 16:22:27 The result: of the 9262 packages present, 2762 failed to build, 6495 successfully built. 16:22:28 basically he threw I think rawhide against EL-6 and got back how many build 16:22:35 smooge F-12 16:22:38 ah ok 16:22:40 cool 16:23:03 some of the build problems look like simple things to fix. I need to see about alpine as its on my list of "needs" 16:23:10 http://linux.dell.com/files/fedora/epel6-build/x86_64/ 16:23:41 oh I didn't see that part 16:23:42 cool 16:24:42 There's a few FTBFS that're going to be holding up a reasonable batch. 16:25:16 FTBFS? 16:25:24 Fails To Build From Source 16:25:31 where deps then can't build 16:26:22 smooge: ooh, yeah I did read that 16:26:51 tremble, thanks 16:27:20 does anyone else have any EL-6 issues to bring up? 16:28:20 #topic libsndfile needs love. Security issue 16:28:33 did I lose the net? 16:28:44 I thought the love had been applied and was now after a proven packager.... 16:28:48 smooge: no, we're just snoozing on mon. morning 16:28:52 proven tester even 16:28:58 even zodbot though 16:29:09 wait.. zodbot never started 16:29:09 smooge: maybe zodbot is sleeping too? 16:29:19 bwahahahah 16:29:23 smooge: no, it can't change the topic. 16:29:37 heh 16:29:43 we need z00dax to give us privs to change that. 16:29:49 ah yes that thing 16:30:08 * nirik is going to look at that libsndfile thing... but hasn't had time yet. 16:30:10 oh wait, I think nirik and I have flags to change stuff here 16:30:17 Jeff_S: nope. 16:30:48 ? 16:31:25 smooge : https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libsndfile-1.0.17-3.el5 16:31:26 Jeff_S: there is a modelock set. 16:31:29 nirik: what do we need to change to give zodbot access? 16:31:36 Jeff_S: it will not let you /mode #epel -t 16:31:48 haha 16:32:07 see if you can get ChanServ to change it 16:32:11 * nirik has a pretty good handle on this irc thing... but if you can fix it, feel free. ;) 16:32:30 smooge: no, it requires flags no one but kbsingh has 16:32:36 looks like nirik and I have f flag so we should be able to screw up all sorts of stuff 16:32:48 ah well probably time to see about 'changing' that then 16:32:51 Jeff_S: we need +s 16:33:23 #action smooge will contact z00dax about getting this channel thing fixed 16:33:40 nirik: thanks 16:33:45 smooge: I'll ask too if I see him first 16:33:58 nirik: I don't remember all those irc flags ;) 16:33:59 yeah thanks. 16:34:18 Actually Jeff_S that might work better. My contact with CentOS seems to have split up 16:34:36 smooge: will do 16:34:42 z00dax seems fairly contactable on #centos-devel 16:35:35 Jeff_S: if you can get him to add +s to me and smooge and you that would be great. 16:36:37 z00dax is pming me at the moment. 16:36:49 nirik, what does +s do exactly? 16:37:05 I just asked him in #centos-devel and he said he'd change 16:37:17 Jeff_S, thanks. 16:37:19 enables the use of the 'set' command. 16:37:19 smooge: /msg chanserv help flags I think lists them all 16:37:28 z00dax is cool. 16:37:38 http://toxin.jottit.com/freenode_chanserv_commands#cs03 16:37:52 nirik, thanks 16:38:59 #topic Open Floor 16:39:09 Do people have anything they need to bring yup? 16:39:21 I have just a FYI... 16:39:27 have been working on Xfce for el5/el6. 16:39:45 ran into another issue with el5, but as soon as I can get mock builds working I can build and test el6. 16:40:28 * siXy points to his earlier comment 16:40:46 siXy, I have no idea what that comment was sorry 16:40:50 could you repeat 16:40:56 nirik, thanks for the FYI 16:40:59 I would like to delay pushing one of his packages to EL-6 even if it misses the deadline if that's ok - major re-write just around the corner, and don't want to fsck with user experiences. It's not a very widely used package anyway 16:41:11 s/his/my/ 16:41:19 Does anything else BR it? 16:41:24 no 16:42:56 As long as it's not holding up a big stack I'd say no problems, 16:43:04 bwhahaha 16:44:08 nothing requires or buildrequires it, userbase is pretty small, so I don't envisage any issues with this. I just don't want to ship a somewhat broken package that's going to change noticeably fairly soon 16:44:54 siXy, I have no problem iwth that. what package? 16:45:06 netsniff-ng. 16:45:16 specialised packet dumper for very busy networks 16:45:29 ah cool. Yeah.. if its going to be a rewrite/rebuild then no problem. 16:45:44 would rather have a good working base than mediawiki all over again. 16:45:59 this was my thought too :) thanks! 16:47:00 ok anything else? [I have mis-typed most of my lines today... ] 16:47:18 then I will be closing in 30. 16:47:48 smooge: great, thanks 16:47:55 mays I ask what is the process when a fedora maintainer don't answer for creating a EPEL branch ? 16:48:07 Wait a week and request the branch yourself 16:48:10 ex: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=565263 16:48:14 RemiFedora: you can file a bug and .... nm, what tremble said 16:48:30 RemiFedora: just cc them on your branch request 16:48:41 ok, thanks 16:48:48 cool. I need to do that on hamster-applet 16:49:04 ok anything else? 16:49:44 RemiFedora: Oh and check that they weren't listed as being on vacation 16:49:54 But that one's been so long any way. 16:50:05 yes 5 month... 16:50:53 long vacation 16:50:58 where do I sign up for that 16:51:38 I want too :) 16:51:55 #endmeeting