18:08:55 #startmeeting EPEL 18:08:55 Meeting started Wed Apr 6 18:08:55 2016 UTC. The chair is smooge. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 18:08:55 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 18:08:55 The meeting name has been set to 'epel' 18:08:55 #meetingname EPEL 18:08:56 #chair smooge nirik Evolution bstinson avij 18:08:56 #topic aloha 18:08:56 The meeting name has been set to 'epel' 18:08:56 Current chairs: Evolution avij bstinson nirik smooge 18:08:58 there we go 18:09:01 much better 18:09:06 yay EPEL meeting 18:09:15 ok roll call. 18:09:18 nirik can not make it 18:09:23 o/ 18:09:24 smooge is here 18:09:28 Evolution is here 18:09:31 bstinson is here 18:09:39 avij is out 18:09:49 we have a bare minimal quorum 18:10:19 #topic outstanding issues 18:11:10 hi so we seem to have some problems with the EPEL 5 build systme this week. tibbs has worked on fixing those 18:12:28 thanks tibbs! 18:13:04 we have a couple of other items that have come up. 18:13:28 I need to get working on arm32 with arrfab still and also work on i386 builders also 18:14:05 smooge: we have some infra that we can throw at a throwaway i386 run 18:14:08 Oh, I didn't do anything besides follow a ticket. 18:14:19 tibbs, you followed a ticket 18:14:22 But comps on EPEL5 has been broken for a very long time. 18:14:30 "file". 18:14:45 and this has been a week where I am going to take even someone file/following a ticket 18:14:46 Didn't get home from work until 8AM today. Ugh. 18:14:54 ouch. 18:15:04 as a big win 18:15:41 #info Tibbs filed a ticket on broken EL5 and seems to have helped fix it. 18:15:55 #info arm32 is still waiting on smooge to get some cycles to test/run 18:16:08 #info i386 is still waiting on smooge to get some cycles to test/run 18:16:31 #info if people can pick up where smooge is at smooge will be happy 18:16:52 bstinson, Evolution there was an email about SCL's wanting info from steering committee people on it 18:17:27 I honestly don't know what the status of things are in CentOS at the moment for SCLs so didn't want to say that putting things that rely on SCLs should be in SCLs in CentOS was a good idea or not 18:17:34 could you guys look at it and respond? 18:18:15 #info SCL question from James Hogarth needs response from more Steering Committee people 18:18:37 #info recharter is waiting on smooge to write some stuff up. 18:18:49 ok I think that is all the outstanding issues at the moment.. 18:18:52 any others ? 18:20:58 none here. on the scl question: the SCL SIG is doing quite a bit of release work, but I'm not sure if we (EPEL) really want to have a position on that yet 18:27:28 well the issue is that I would like to get a feel on what the release work is. 18:27:53 if it is telling people: if you are interested in SCL you need to be here << mailing list name >> then we should do so 18:28:38 at this point i am as confused over where scl is as the next person 18:28:45 sorry I lost my connection to the net 18:29:19 sure we can put that information out on that thread 18:29:25 mostly they're working on this list: 18:29:29 https://www.redhat.com/archives/sclorg/ 18:29:42 but releasing through the CentOS mirror network 18:30:09 `yum install centos-release-scl` will enable their repos 18:32:58 ok thanks 18:33:07 alright I don't have anything else for today 18:33:17 #topic open floor 18:33:27 does anyone have anything for the flood? 18:35:23 ok closing in 1 minute otherwise 18:38:30 #endmeeting