18:00:52 #startmeeting EPEL (2018-05-30) 18:00:52 Meeting started Wed May 30 18:00:52 2018 UTC. 18:00:52 This meeting is logged and archived in a public location. 18:00:52 The chair is smooge. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 18:00:52 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 18:00:52 The meeting name has been set to 'epel_(2018-05-30)' 18:00:52 #meetingname EPEL 18:00:52 The meeting name has been set to 'epel' 18:00:52 #topic aloha 18:00:52 #chair avij bstinson Evolution nirik smooge 18:00:52 Current chairs: Evolution avij bstinson nirik smooge 18:00:56 Hello everyone 18:00:58 hello 18:01:50 morning everyone 18:02:01 happy 3rd monday everyone 18:02:25 3rd monday of eternal september? :) 18:02:40 #topic agenda 18:02:41 #info EPIC 18:02:41 #info flock talks? 18:02:41 #info smbios 18:02:41 #info clamav 18:02:41 #info open floor 18:02:56 EPEL meeting! 18:03:30 So this is pretty much the last meeting but boiled down to its essential components 18:03:48 Anyone have anything to add? 18:04:06 I think the agenda is fine 18:04:09 #topic EPIC 18:04:11 lgtm 18:04:57 OK I put up the EPIC proposal on my blog and the mailing list. I have a couple of small changes to make from mattdm's comments and I will be putting it towards the devel list. 18:05:08 Was there any other feedback that I should incorporate before doing that? 18:05:48 might be good for centos-devel too? or is that too off topic? 18:06:03 https://smoogespace.blogspot.com/2018/05/blue-sky-discussion-epel-next-or-epic.html 18:06:21 Evolution, bstinson avij ? 18:06:23 worth pointing the centos-devel list to, but we shoudl keep the discussion in one place. 18:07:12 OK and that place should be epel-devel? 18:07:25 I think so. 18:07:32 sounds good to me 18:07:46 I will do so this evening 18:08:18 OK next topic 18:08:23 #topic FLOCK talks 18:09:15 The CFP for Flock is coming up. Does anyone have ideas for EPEL related talks? 18:09:18 flock. we should have it. 18:10:38 i'm submitting 2 CI talks, 1 focused on adding tests to some EPEL branches 18:10:39 I'd be in favor of a semi-completed version of the epic/epel proposal. 18:10:44 well, that EPIC thing perhaps 18:10:45 * nirik needs to ponder on what to submit 18:11:22 Evolution, that sounds good. I think we will need to look at how this plays out with people and also what work needs to be done where. 18:11:24 if at flock someone can stand up and say "we've had a couple months of epel/epic discussions. *this* is our way forward" 18:11:40 then see if anyone lights us on fire because of it. 18:11:53 yep. 18:11:58 it would be nice to have a pool of people who step up to do the work. :) 18:12:02 * smooge note to self Asbestos 18:12:12 nirik: we do. 18:12:19 * Evolution looks pointedly at nirik and smooge 18:12:20 nirik, it would be nice if we had a pool. 18:12:22 :-P 18:12:31 ha. :) 18:12:46 yeah, I mean a pool would at least be relaxing after doing all that work. :) 18:12:50 anyhow... 18:13:02 I think our pool for everything is going to be the usual suspects.. but we will see what we can add to it 18:13:21 bstinson, that talks sounds good. 18:13:30 #info smbios 18:13:35 #topic smbios 18:13:51 ok nirik pushed an update and carlwgeorge wrote up a spec file 18:14:28 I started comparing the 3 different spec files: 18:14:32 a) EPEL current 18:14:38 b) CentOS current 18:14:47 c) libsmbios-cpp 18:15:03 it is amazing how different 3 things based on the same thing are 18:15:22 indeed 18:15:32 I meant to review this last weekend, but never got to it. ;( 18:16:17 so I have not done a formal review in 8? years so I am having to read a lot of material 18:16:48 my first layer one says "well it makes rpmlint cry.. but so does the original spec" 18:17:05 I am not sure if we are to make it better than RHEL :) 18:17:18 rpmlint is advisory only. you can ignore it if need be 18:17:38 if you want I can try and knock it out, or just leave it to you since you already are looking. 18:17:55 I will finish the docs on how to review a package this afternoon and get you to say I did the review right or wrong 18:18:31 if that sounds good 18:18:43 sure, happy to doublecheck 18:18:53 * carlwgeorge waves 18:19:07 it should be mainly on your side "lgtm" or "you forgot to wizbang the zipperdo, you got to wizbang the zipperdo or the whogamafinger dies" 18:19:21 to avoid back and forth bugzilla comments, i'm happy to clarify any of my thought process for that spec 18:19:25 in irc i mean 18:19:41 carlwgeorge, understood. I won't be able to get to it until 1700 ET 18:19:53 but can leave questions if any in IRC 18:20:04 the epel spec file has lots of unnecessary stuff, like suse compatibility 18:20:38 it looked pretty close to the RHEL one which odesn't 18:21:00 ok I think that is about it at the moment. 18:21:12 #topic clamav 18:22:27 So clamav is reporting that it is old. 18:22:42 clamav will always report that ;) 18:22:43 I started to look into this and found that the 0.100 is in EPEL-testing 18:22:49 it is 200 meg of staleness 18:23:15 so if you are running clamav and need it to be newer, test the version in epel-testing and give it positive/negative karma 18:23:17 * nirik sends clamav and it's pal xscreensaver off to the corner. 18:24:15 nirik: I tried to (as it blows up builder requirements something awful), but my changes to put it on a diet got reverted out * shrug * 18:24:41 clamav has always been a troublesome package. ;) 18:24:45 smooge: I did not see it in the epel email this morning -- must have missed it 18:24:54 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-88c0c447a4 18:25:44 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-4b08b15845 18:25:52 those are the 2 for EL6 and EL7 18:26:35 so please test and let us know 18:26:49 thanks orc_fedo 18:26:54 ok last up 18:26:57 #topic open floor 18:27:14 karaoke starts in 4 minutes 18:27:23 * nirik runs 18:27:58 does anyone have regular items? 18:28:18 nope 18:28:32 none from me 18:29:35 nothing here 18:30:29 Feelings, wooahh feeeeeelings 18:30:34 thank you all 18:30:38 #endmeeting