17:00:46 #startmeeting EPEL (2018-10-03) 17:00:46 Meeting started Wed Oct 3 17:00:46 2018 UTC. 17:00:46 This meeting is logged and archived in a public location. 17:00:46 The chair is smooge. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 17:00:46 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 17:00:46 The meeting name has been set to 'epel_(2018-10-03)' 17:00:46 #meetingname epel 17:00:46 #topic Chair and Introductions 17:00:46 #chair avij bstinson Evolution nirik smooge 17:00:46 The meeting name has been set to 'epel' 17:00:46 Current chairs: Evolution avij bstinson nirik smooge 17:00:54 morning 17:00:59 Hello everyone. this will be a short meeting 17:01:03 hello 17:01:04 hello 17:01:57 First I would like to move the VFAD one week out to 2018-10-23. I have not had enough time to get things in place for meeting 2018-10-16 17:02:27 If that is ok I will work with bexelbie tomorrow/friday on getting that done 17:02:29 * nirik looks 17:02:50 that will be after the centos day at cern, so that's actually better. 17:03:59 hmm, I'll be abroad and not connected to 'net on 2018-10-23 (and on Wed 24th), but you likely won't need me anyway 17:04:49 urgh.. so good for some.. bad for others 17:05:13 I'd say to go ahead with 2018-10-23 17:05:17 ok thanks 17:05:33 I'm heading out on the 24th, but should be around on the 23rd 17:06:07 #topic python36 VFAD 17:06:07 #info will be done on 2018-10-23 17:06:07 #info need to work with nirik on steps needed to do during 17:06:07 #info need to work with bex on setting up VFAD messaging? 17:06:08 #info need to work with python-devel on what they can do 17:06:41 * nirik nods. would be good to get the python-sig involved... 17:06:43 I will answer an email from bex after the meeting and get what is needed on our part done 17:06:54 s/python-devel/python-sig 17:07:44 I don't have much more to add to that at the moment 17:08:10 #topic EPEL talk at Devconf? 17:08:23 so Devconf is coming up and Devconf RFP is almost done 17:08:39 Yeah, a talk on the future of epel could be nice... 17:08:40 so I would like to put in at least 1 or 2 EPEL for developers talks 17:08:53 lots of things we could talk about there... 17:09:11 I can shoot a proposal to the list by end of physical day? 17:09:33 but I would be happy to hear anything people want 17:10:18 CFP closes 10-26 17:10:29 and if others are interested in talks or doing talks I would be happy to help on them 17:10:52 smooge: perhaps a group talk? whoever is there, we can divide up and do various people on various topics? 17:10:56 I'd like to see a devconf talk about the future of epel, with the changes/plans smooge and others have sent to the list. 17:10:59 and if people are working on proposals or have them already.. I wrote that for this meeting 17:11:27 so I am not trying to replace what people may have done.. I just realized I needed to get er done myself 17:11:30 * nirik would be happy to talk on most any epel topic 17:12:31 nirik, me too 17:12:52 ok I can throw an idea out by end of today and maybe we can brainstrom them out 17:13:34 I think a furture of epel talking about plans and possibly epic ideas sounds good. 17:14:00 ok will write up the 300 word ones for that and put to list by eod 17:14:44 I figure that 10-26 means if I don't have it final written by 10-16 and beta written by 10-06 I would miss it due to usual suspect of fires 17:14:57 ok that was all 17:15:16 #topic Alternative Architectures 17:15:16 #info pgreco has info on arm 17:15:41 yes 17:15:53 this week started uploading patches from the rebuild 17:16:01 nirik fixed libgdiplus a few weeks ago 17:16:10 PR for kstars was accepted (may need need upgrade in the future) 17:16:19 finishing kf5 rebase from rdieter 17:16:32 need to talk to juhp about updated packages from ghc 17:16:49 cool 17:16:56 need to talk to someone from "root" due to failing tests (who?) 17:17:05 and someone from the python team, pypy FTBFS (but maybe this can wait until the python rebase) 17:18:10 I guess that's it ;) 17:18:28 thanks pgreco for working on this 17:18:41 suggestions? 17:18:49 ellert is the root person... I think they are pretty active most of the time... 17:18:54 ellert@fedoraproject.org 17:19:54 thanks pgreco 17:20:03 I don't have any suggestions 17:20:13 ack, can someone tell him I'll be sending him an email?, just so he knows 17:22:04 ok will do so 17:22:18 #topic Removing dead packages 17:22:28 #info banshee is uninstallable 17:22:53 it can be rebuilt, just by disabling BR and some options 17:23:02 I can test that 17:23:06 ok thanks 17:23:17 .whoowns banshee 17:23:18 smooge: owner: spot; admin: elsupergomez, moezroy, tpokorra - Fedora EPEL: moezroy 17:23:26 * nirik is happy to push pr's/patches to things... although I don't want to maintain banshee. ;) 17:23:28 I will contact moezroy to have it rebuild 17:24:06 the other option would be to maintain the package that was removed 17:24:13 nirik, so that is one thing we haven't documented in the past.. who do we want to deal with proven-packager fixing things in EPEL 17:24:32 libimobiledevice-xxxxx subpackage 17:24:35 hum? not sure what you mean? 17:24:47 * pgreco looks the exact name 17:24:50 banshee-2.6.2-11.el7.x86_64 is uninstallable because it Requires: libgpod-sharp >= 0.8.2. no libgpod-sharp exists. 17:25:04 thanks 17:25:21 libgpod-sharp is a part of the libimobiledevice/iphone support 17:25:25 iirc 17:25:27 nirik, if we have a pr fix for banshee, do we as proven packagers fix it.. or do we have moezroy do so 17:25:38 it was removed in the rebase for 7.5 iirc 17:26:03 if we rebuild only that subpackage (added to what RHEL provides) 17:26:03 the packager definitely should normally. 17:26:14 we should be able to install current banshee 17:26:19 but if they are not around, or it blocks other things, pp can step in 17:27:06 nirik, does that make sense .. I was looking at our epel docs last week and where pp step in for it did not seem clear so it popped into my head 17:27:20 sorry does that make sense was my "if we have pr fix" 17:27:34 but you detailed what should be done 17:27:43 man my typing sux today 17:27:44 yeah, just the same as a bug with a patch... 17:28:14 ok will see if there is a bug and see if moezroy can/will fix it 17:28:32 and that was it 17:28:39 #topic Open Floor 17:29:06 anyone have anything for the open floor.. otherwise this is hour N of meetings for me so I would like to give everyone some time 17:29:18 nope 17:29:42 * nirik has nothing 17:29:58 ok in that case I am going to say good night everyone. see you next week 17:30:05 #endmeeting