18:00:42 #startmeeting EPEL (2019-07-03) 18:00:42 Meeting started Wed Jul 3 18:00:42 2019 UTC. 18:00:42 This meeting is logged and archived in a public location. 18:00:42 The chair is smooge. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 18:00:42 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 18:00:42 The meeting name has been set to 'epel_(2019-07-03)' 18:00:42 #meetingname epel 18:00:42 #topic Chair and Introductions 18:00:42 #chair bstinson Evolution nirik smooge pgreco tdawson 18:00:42 The meeting name has been set to 'epel' 18:00:42 Current chairs: Evolution bstinson nirik pgreco smooge tdawson 18:01:08 oh look, another meeting. hurray! 18:01:28 *laughs* 18:01:45 I believe I detect a touch of sarcasm in your voice. 18:01:54 * smooge has only 3 more to do today 18:02:10 ok so this meeting will be short 18:02:16 #topic EPEL-8 Status 18:02:44 We got most everything done in staging we wanted to get done. We need to reimplement those changes in production in the next couple of weeks. 18:03:28 The two biggest bugaboos which need to be dealt with in the next 2 weeks are: how are we branching and how are we building (with modularity) 18:03:29 hello 18:04:09 * nirik sent out an email about the buildroot stuff... to smart people who can tell us whats wrong with our plans. 18:04:14 tdawson has been building various packages in koji.stg.fedoraproject.org 18:04:53 nirik, thanks. I expect we will find out that no matter what we choose.. we will be wrong 18:05:01 yep 18:05:07 count on it. ;) 18:05:23 ok any questions or items? 18:05:27 neither of our schemes allows for building against non default modules currently... 18:05:45 is it something we need atm? 18:05:54 I mean, building against non default modules 18:06:10 nirik, so when I talked internally.. the only way to build against non-default modules is to make it a module 18:06:30 pgreco: well, there are 2 big ones... 18:06:55 what are they? 18:07:01 python2 is one I assume 18:07:07 that is actually default 18:07:11 oj 18:07:12 ok 18:07:15 javapackages-tools 18:07:18 virt-devel 18:07:46 so I got them in the grobisplitter version 18:07:47 so, not much java or virt building can take place. :) 18:08:03 smooge: did you also disable the default ones they conflict with? 18:08:26 so currently they don't conflict 18:08:53 ah, I thought they did 18:09:06 they conflict at the modular level 18:09:14 at the rpm level they currently do not 18:09:17 however.... 18:09:21 that could change 18:09:22 ok. 18:09:48 oh sorry virt-devel does conflict at the rpm level and that is because it hasn't been updated since release 18:09:59 right. 18:10:06 so, in theory, modules shouldn't ever conflict with base 18:10:21 in case of conflict, there should be another module 18:10:21 yeah 18:10:26 so building with it means building against stuff you might not be able to use anyway 18:10:39 and to be clear this is the virt-devel module conflicting with the newer virt modules 18:10:48 correct 18:10:51 smooge, unless you're building something extra for that specific module 18:11:10 * nirik is fine just saying, sorry, no building against those, make a module (when we get that working0 18:12:00 yeap, I think of it as nice feature for the future, but not right now 18:13:35 at the moment, I am just wanting to get some stuff out the door and get an idea of how much we can't do until modularity building is implemented 18:13:47 * nirik nods 18:14:22 if in EPEL-8.2 we realize everything should be modules.. then we should have the tools to make that happen 18:14:56 ok I have 10 minutes and 2 items 18:15:08 #topic EPEL update knot package https://pagure.io/epel/issue/60 18:16:19 ok, this is a nice example of what we've been planning for 8.x 18:16:28 I think this is pretty much needing Evolution bstinson and pgreco +1/0/-1 and it is approved 18:16:47 if the plan is to do that for 7.7, +1 no question 18:17:03 before that, I'm a little torn 18:17:33 the issue I have is that we still do not have the 7 build system set up to do staging 18:17:48 oooh nirik I just realized the name 18:18:07 smooge, we could set a really high karma needed 18:18:26 since people don't like epel7-rawhide.. we should call it epel7-stagecoach 18:18:43 I like labs... 18:18:45 pgreco, agreed 18:19:10 nirik, I thought you then said labs would conflict with the other labs 18:19:35 oh right. hum 18:20:08 added my +1 18:21:02 how about playground? it's a bit unserious, but kinda describes it... 18:21:32 I do like playground 18:21:37 nirik, that was taken by something mattdm was going to do? 18:21:46 :( 18:21:47 anyway.. I don't mind one way or the other. 18:22:00 yeah, I think it was part of the rings thing... but it never really happened? 18:22:03 I like it, but it kinda gives the message that it is to do anything, not to stage big changes 18:22:25 i will let whoever sets up the tags name it .. if I do it will be bikeshed 18:22:32 but, any name has it issues :) 18:23:14 outside of that I think we are good on that one 18:23:29 yeap 18:23:44 https://pagure.io/epel/issue/59 was the other issue but I think we are out of time for a long discussion on it right now 18:23:45 I can ask mattdm if he's ok... or has ideas. :) 18:24:20 like i said.. i don't care what the name is beyond it has something 18:24:34 other than again, discussion on the actual name, I'm ok with it 18:24:45 the default will be sid at this rate 18:26:27 we still have some time for figuring it. 18:26:27 pete...because he's the *prospector* 18:26:29 I think we can vote on this in the ticket and approve it there 18:26:41 ooooooh 18:26:52 nope sorry I said I don't care what the name is 18:27:06 smooge, say it and close 18:27:15 so nobody can refute it 18:27:39 do you think we can vote on this next week? 18:28:08 perhaps 18:28:22 I'd like that 18:28:25 other than that I think that is all I have for this week. I apologize for the short length on debate for this week, but meetings seem to grow 18:29:05 #topic open floor 18:29:40 ok thank you all for coming and I hope you have a good couple of days. I am off to go test some pre-release OS 18:29:48 #endmeeting