22:00:36 #startmeeting EPEL (2020-11-20) 22:00:36 Meeting started Fri Nov 20 22:00:36 2020 UTC. 22:00:36 This meeting is logged and archived in a public location. 22:00:36 The chair is tdawson. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 22:00:36 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 22:00:36 The meeting name has been set to 'epel_(2020-11-20)' 22:00:37 #meetingname epel 22:00:37 The meeting name has been set to 'epel' 22:00:39 #chair nirik tdawson bstinson pgreco carlwgeorge 22:00:39 Current chairs: bstinson carlwgeorge nirik pgreco tdawson 22:00:40 #topic aloha 22:01:35 hi everybody, it's that time of the week again ;) 22:02:20 hello 22:02:31 Hi pgreco 22:02:34 Hi smooge 22:02:35 * King_InuYasha waves 22:02:40 .hello ngompa 22:02:41 King_InuYasha: ngompa 'Neal Gompa' 22:02:44 Hi King_InuYasha 22:02:48 .hello salimma 22:02:49 michel_slm: salimma 'Michel Alexandre Salim' 22:03:12 Hi michel_slm 22:03:21 * michel_slm waves at everyone 22:03:31 fittingly I'm taking this meeting from my CentOS laptop 22:03:55 michel_slm: that's good news ;) 22:05:20 #topic Old Business 22:05:49 epel-playground - we're basically all set, just waiting for fedpkg to be built. 22:06:12 I am needing to put time into tickets for EPEL Stream 22:06:40 Isn't it going to be epel-next ? 22:07:19 sure 22:07:33 i don't name the things.. i just move the bits 22:07:37 Anyone know how often the fedpkg people do a new build? 22:07:39 :) 22:07:43 I am needing to put time into tickets for EPEL-net 22:07:50 tdawson: should we file an issue for that? 22:08:08 .whoowns fedpkg 22:08:09 smooge: owner: onosek; admin: cqi, lsedlar 22:08:13 I asked for a release in a closed issue, and I'm not sure if Pagure actually notifies the tagged person 22:08:34 michel_slm: I don't know. I don't know if they do it "every two months" or if they wait until someone asks. 22:08:45 let's file a bugzilla issue then 22:09:12 I'm fine with that. michel_slm do you mind filing it? 22:09:26 I've been using the stable version and, FWIW, it works. it generates an extra request for epel8-playground that I normally immediately close, and it warns that package.cfg is missing but continues working 22:09:34 yeah, I'll file it 22:09:45 Thanks 22:10:29 As far as I know, once that get's built and out, we are done with the epel-playground transition. 22:11:16 While smooge is here, let's move on to epel8-next ... though I was hoping carlwgeorge would be here too. 22:12:23 smooge: Do you have an estimate of how long it will take before you can get to those tickets? 22:12:55 isn't there a shutdown / upgrade / maintenance thing happening soon? 22:12:57 next week because everyone is away and I can finally work on things 22:13:04 :) 22:13:28 No meetings, No managers 22:13:42 {with a giant Anarchy symbol} 22:13:49 hehe 22:14:10 Almost as good as working during christmas break, but without having to work on christmas. 22:14:20 for the meeting info - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1900134 22:14:50 we get the week off at FB so I can finally get some Fedora work done too :p 22:15:13 it is amazing the level of productivity a person can have without having to deal with other people :P 22:15:21 #info fedpkg needs to be built with the new code for epel-playground transistion. Bug has been filed. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1900134 22:16:07 I remember the week I was the only one that didn't go to flock for some reason. Much productivity. 22:16:21 my most productive weeks 22:16:32 anyway.. I will be working on it Mon-Wed 22:16:50 smooge: OK, that sounds great. We'll check in on you the week after. 22:16:52 It is mostly writing the documents on how it is done, then doing it, then handing the docs to the new admins 22:17:18 at least the new admins agree that I spell colour correctly 22:17:27 *laughs* 22:18:09 Anything else for epel8-next? Anything you need any help with? 22:19:43 OK, moving on to EPEL-Packaging-SIG ... michel_slm I'm sorry I missed this last week. 22:20:07 no worries! I actually don't have any update this week 22:20:22 :) Cool ... Then that makes it short. 22:20:35 the one thing I want to discuss is... how do we want to onboard people to the SIG 22:20:53 any example docs I can borrow, e.g. how to be a proven packager? I sense it shouldn't be "if you want it you're in" 22:23:00 Very good question ... oddly ... the proven packager page does say what the qualifications are other than fesco voting - https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Provenpackager_policy/ 22:23:00 I took time off next week, so I can do stuff too :) 22:23:03 a little less that proven packager, a bit more than that ;) 22:23:45 Definatly need to be a Fedora packager, so they know the general rules. 22:23:47 maybe Python SIG has some policy 22:24:05 yeah, I think that's already baked in to the group ACL 22:24:15 but I should put it down in writint 22:24:35 once we have a consensus and I have it written, I can link that page from the EPEL SIG. right now I'm intentionally keeping it hard to find 22:24:43 * michel_slm brb 22:25:17 if it is on the wiki.. it is by definition hard to find 22:25:31 :) 22:25:36 that said thanks michel_slm for doing that 22:26:13 Definatly, I think this will be a very good thing for EPEL. Thank you michel_slm 22:26:26 Yeap 22:26:51 I'm hoping to clean up my $dayjob schedule so I can build some packages for epel 22:27:07 sounds a bit utopic, but a guy can dream 22:27:47 and on that note, I have a call from work..., bbiab 22:27:53 thanks all for all the input. yeah, haha, I wonder if our wiki supports tagging 22:28:15 * smooge remembers that it is probably time to move the wiki version to something supported again 22:28:26 woah 22:28:36 Like, Fedora Docs? 22:28:53 on the policy front, I need to write an EPEL issue to discuss how we want branching requests to be handled if the maintainer doesn't respond 22:29:09 oh, using Fedora Docs might make sense, true 22:29:24 should we move the EPEL SIG doc as well, in that case? 22:30:19 If the EPEL docs move to Fedora Docs (from the wiki) we'll need to move all the docs. So ya, the SIG docs would need to move also. 22:31:03 But, go ahead and put it in the wiki for now. 22:31:26 I haven't seen anyone jumping up and down wanting to do the conversion. 22:31:41 I'll experiment getting a Lua packaging guideline to Fedora Docs next week so I'll have more familiarity with how it works. right now I've only done one PR for a minor change 22:32:25 should I mail the list with the wiki link once I write the proposed joining guidelines? 22:32:37 That sounds good 22:32:40 and then we can move on to the next topic 22:32:54 OK 22:33:03 * nirik isn't really here, but waves anyhow. 22:33:09 #info EPEL-6 is End of Life in 2020-11-30. It will be moved to archives in 2020-12 22:33:10 #info THIS IS NOT A DRILL - 2 weeks left 22:33:15 Hi nirik 22:33:22 I would like to point something scary 22:33:36 I'm basically in the same mode as nirik now... 22:34:06 https://data-analysis.fedoraproject.org/csv-reports/images/epel-all.png look at EL6 usage in the last year 22:34:52 Yipes 22:35:12 I thought the curve looked fine in 2018.. starting to go down. Now its like watching a covid uptick 22:35:31 huh, fun. 22:35:38 I've heard on other mailling lists people asking how to archive EPEL6 22:35:49 yikes 22:36:12 It's the last release before systemd came in. Some people are still a little scared to make that step. 22:36:14 I will have an article on both how to archive centos and epel6 over the weekend 22:36:15 I wonder if the MOTD should be changed to "if you're deploying this you're doing something wrong" :p 22:36:35 if all goes well 22:36:47 maybe die hard holdbacks will release a Centuan 8 based on CentOS 8 :p 22:36:56 smooge: That would be good. 22:36:58 or they have some ancient app that won't work on newer... 22:37:13 * nirik whistles innocently, points to the fedora account system. 22:37:26 now now.. lets not shame the living 22:37:42 nirik: hopefully you'd be able to get a EUS licence for that 22:37:49 *license 22:37:49 anyway back to the main problem 22:38:03 pgreco, it sits inside of a container 22:38:09 it's in a container... and we are replacing it soon, but yeah, hopefully it will run ok in a container until we can finish removing it. 22:38:16 containers are security safe so we don't have to update it anymore 22:38:28 I am pretty sure there are still some Red Hat 7.3 systems out there. 22:38:44 smooge: the drop in epel5 a while back... is that when it went eol? 22:39:03 2017ish? 22:39:08 it was.. when CentOS stops answering.. most systems yum break 22:39:33 so when the CentOS mirrorlist stops giving data on CentOS-6... I expect we will see a major drop 22:39:34 so likely we will see similar on epel6 22:39:38 yeah 22:39:45 smooge: nirik: Anything you need help with on closing things up? 22:39:46 the boxes are still there 22:40:07 and sometimes when someone actually fixes the yum.. it comes back 22:40:37 not really. I just archive it over.. adrian changes the mirrormanager to point to archives 22:40:52 should open a releng ticket to close builds/disable in bodhi, etc... 22:40:58 and nirik has to do all that ^^ 22:41:00 and hopefully bcotton is gonna close bugs. 22:41:14 I was planning on sending out the final "it's gone" email, along with thanks to all the EPEL6 packagers. 22:41:45 Oh ya ... the great bug closing. :) It's so refreshing. 22:42:25 my bug count goes down... jwz yells about cadt... it's fun 22:42:39 Yep 22:42:57 Anything else before we move on, I really want to get to Open Floor. 22:43:26 #topic EPEL-7 22:43:47 I did my "will it install" on EPEL7, and was peasently surprised. 22:43:51 I'm hoping to make some progress on stuff for python3 koji next week 22:44:42 For epel7? 22:45:15 there shouldn't be too much left to make Python 3 Koji work on EPEL 7 22:45:27 There were only about 20 packages that failed to build. And only needed about 12 bugzilla's. And a couple are already fixed. 22:45:29 yeah, 2 or 3 packages I think 22:45:36 it's close 22:46:49 epel bz stat: 2581 open bugs. 22:47:07 Ooohh 22:47:31 I wonder how much that will go down when EPEL6 bugs are closed. 22:47:38 epel6: 727, epel7: 1440, epel8: 414 22:47:46 nah we are going to move them all to latest release 22:47:54 *laughs* 22:48:12 410 of those epel8 are 'can you build ' 22:48:28 anyway.. I need to stop trolling you all 22:48:30 OK, moving on to ... EPEL8 22:48:41 #topic EPEL-8 22:48:48 I don't really have anything for EPEL8 22:49:02 oh I guess we need a countdown for when EPEL-7 goes end of life. 22:49:02 I'm not going to do my "will it install" until CentOS 8.3 comes out. 22:49:25 thank you 22:49:45 I don't need to be inundated with EL8.3 related breakages until after I can actually see them and fix them :) 22:50:20 Yep. Although I don't think there will be many ... but ... we'll see. 22:50:55 Although, I could do a run and just put the list in an email so people can see. 22:50:56 smooge: hopefully we get the processes for the packagers SIG working before epel9 :) 22:51:24 That would/will be nice. 22:51:37 agreed 22:51:45 OK, moving on to open floor ... 22:51:51 #topic General Issues / Open Floor 22:51:58 I need to head out. Thanks for letting me troll you this week. I will be back in 2 weeks with a new routine. 22:52:08 Is everyone ok with not having a meeting next week? 22:52:13 i am 22:52:26 i mean i will probably be working on whatever is broken in koji 22:52:41 But ... you don't need a meeting to add on top of that. 22:52:52 I have had 5 meetings on a friday 22:52:58 its an addiction 22:53:18 Anyway, I won't be around, and I'm hoping that, other than smooge, people will be doing something else during the holiday. 22:54:11 Although in my state, going anywhere for Thanksgiving is frowned upon. 22:54:55 yeah, +1 to skip 22:55:48 So, looks like we have 3 for skipping. 22:56:39 michel_slm: pgreco: King_InuYasha: If ya'll want to have the regular meeting next week, you certainly can if you want. 22:56:55 I'm OK either way 22:57:13 let's just skip it -- +1 22:59:05 It looks like pgreco is still doing other stuff ... but even if he and King_InuYasha wanted the meeting, it looks like 4 to possibly 2. 22:59:17 skip please 22:59:30 I'm on PTO next week and I'd like to think of less meetings 22:59:36 OK, it's official, we're skipping the meeting next week. 23:00:13 Thank you all for coming this week. It was a very good discussion. We'll talk with everyone in two weeks, December 4th. 23:00:23 "and hopefully is gonna close bugs" he is! 23:00:36 #info No meeting next week. Next meeting December 4 23:00:39 #endmeeting