#meeting-1:fedoraproject.org log

<@meetbot:fedora.im>

17:29:02

HTML Log: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/meeting-1_matrix_fedoraproject-org/2025-03-12/fedora-coreos-meeting.2025-03-12-16.31.log.html

<@meetbot:fedora.im>

17:29:02

Text Minutes: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/meeting-1_matrix_fedoraproject-org/2025-03-12/fedora-coreos-meeting.2025-03-12-16.31.txt

<@tdawson:fedora.im>

18:00:23

!startmeeting EPEL (2025-03-05)

<@meetbot:fedora.im>

18:00:25

Meeting started at 2025-03-12 18:00:23 UTC

<@meetbot:fedora.im>

18:00:25

The Meeting name is 'EPEL (2025-03-05)'

<@tdawson:fedora.im>

18:00:29

!meetingname epel

<@tdawson:fedora.im>

18:00:29

!topic aloha

<@meetbot:fedora.im>

18:00:30

The Meeting Name is now epel

<@nhanlon:beeper.com>

18:00:34

!hi

<@zodbot:fedora.im>

18:00:35

Neil Hanlon (neil) - he / him / his

<@nhanlon:beeper.com>

18:00:43

howzit, Troy

<@davide:cavalca.name>

18:00:56

!hi

<@zodbot:fedora.im>

18:00:58

Davide Cavalca (dcavalca) - he / him / his

<@tdawson:fedora.im>

18:02:03

Hi Neil Hanlon and Davide Cavalca

<@jonathanspw:fedora.im>

18:02:47

!hi

<@zodbot:fedora.im>

18:02:48

Jonathan Wright (jonathanspw)

<@tdawson:fedora.im>

18:03:20

Hi Jonathan Wright

<@dherrera:fedora.im>

18:03:24

!hi

<@zodbot:fedora.im>

18:03:26

Diego Herrera (dherrera) - he / him / his

<@tdawson:fedora.im>

18:03:32

Hi Diego Herrera

<@nirik:matrix.scrye.com>

18:03:47

morning.

<@tdawson:fedora.im>

18:04:07

Morning nirik

<@salimma:fedora.im>

18:04:22

!hi

<@zodbot:fedora.im>

18:04:23

Michel Lind (salimma) - he / him / his

<@tdawson:fedora.im>

18:04:44

Hi Michel Lind UTC-6

<@tdawson:fedora.im>

18:05:17

!link https://pagure.io/epel/issues?tags=meeting&status=Open

<@tdawson:fedora.im>

18:05:17

!topic EPEL Issues https://pagure.io/epel/issues

<@tdawson:fedora.im>

18:05:55

It looks like we don't have any issues marked with Meeting this week, so moving on.

<@tdawson:fedora.im>

18:06:05

!topic EPEL 10

<@tdawson:fedora.im>

18:06:43

Do we have any news / progress for EPEL 10 this week?

<@dherrera:fedora.im>

18:07:38

Nothing much on my side, besides getting some pending things merged

<@salimma:fedora.im>

18:08:08

I guess we did not cover that Evolution is in EPEL10 now :)

<@tdawson:fedora.im>

18:08:11

Diego Herrera: I did see that you closed a few tickets. I just want to thank you again for getting the branching and other things done.

<@salimma:fedora.im>

18:08:14

I've been dogfooding it and it works well

<@tdawson:fedora.im>

18:08:39

Cool. It seems strange ... but cool anyway.

<@salimma:fedora.im>

18:09:22

bring back RHEL / CentOS Workstation :D

<@tdawson:fedora.im>

18:09:57

*laughs* ... well ... I'm going to keep my mouth shut.

<@tdawson:fedora.im>

18:10:11

Anything else before I move on?

<@dherrera:fedora.im>

18:10:21

let's move on ;)

<@tdawson:fedora.im>

18:10:31

!topic Old Business

<@nhanlon:beeper.com>

18:10:34

Nice re: evolution 🙂 always good to have options for people that don't want to use mutt 😛

<@salimma:fedora.im>

18:11:02

oh I use mutt too

<@tdawson:fedora.im>

18:11:27

I'm debating on saying !epel 322 is old business or not.

<@salimma:fedora.im>

18:11:30

but yeah my carddav package is still blocked on so many dependencies for epel10, while evolution handles that built in, so... yay I have my addresses

<@tdawson:fedora.im>

18:12:02

That's on getting the policy of having "epel" in the name documented.

<@tdawson:fedora.im>

18:12:14

!epel 322

<@zodbot:fedora.im>

18:12:14

● **Opened:** 2 days ago by tdawson

<@zodbot:fedora.im>

18:12:14

<@zodbot:fedora.im>

18:12:14

**epel #322** (https://pagure.io/epel/issue/322):**Document EPEL policy on packages with epel in the name**

<@zodbot:fedora.im>

18:12:14

● **Assignee:** Not Assigned

<@zodbot:fedora.im>

18:12:14

● **Last Updated:** 2 days ago

<@tdawson:fedora.im>

18:12:52

It's old business, because we already had the discussion about it ... but new because ... well, we need to get it documented, and possibly voted on.

<@tdawson:fedora.im>

18:13:13

I still haven't found it in the meeting minutes, but I'm also terrible at grepping them.

<@tdawson:fedora.im>

18:14:06

Anyway, if someone knows when we talked about that, even if it's down to a 6 month timeframe ... please put it in the ticket.

<@tdawson:fedora.im>

18:14:29

That's all I have for Old Business ... anything else someone wants to bring up?

<@dherrera:fedora.im>

18:14:38

yeah :)

<@salimma:fedora.im>

18:14:43

oh fun

<@salimma:fedora.im>

18:15:03

yeah ... someone recently wanted to use -epel for something very different, right? selinux policies?

<@tdawson:fedora.im>

18:15:52

Well, it's different in that it's not missing packages, but it also falls into the "this is really only for epel"

<@dherrera:fedora.im>

18:15:54

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2346531

<@dherrera:fedora.im>

18:16:19

I think it was that one

<@tdawson:fedora.im>

18:16:35

Correct

<@tdawson:fedora.im>

18:16:43

I made it into this ticket

<@salimma:fedora.im>

18:16:47

do they have examples of packages that would be covered by this policy?

<@tdawson:fedora.im>

18:16:51

!epel 323

<@zodbot:fedora.im>

18:16:52

<@zodbot:fedora.im>

18:16:52

**epel #323** (https://pagure.io/epel/issue/323):**Add selinux-policy-epel to the exception list of packages that have epel in their name**

<@zodbot:fedora.im>

18:16:52

● **Opened:** 2 days ago by tdawson

<@zodbot:fedora.im>

18:16:52

● **Last Updated:** Never

<@zodbot:fedora.im>

18:16:52

● **Assignee:** Not Assigned

<@tdawson:fedora.im>

18:17:42

Michel Lind UTC-6: That's why I'm trying to find where we had the discussion ... so it will be easier to say "here is the policy, here is the recommendation"

<@tdawson:fedora.im>

18:18:09

Otherwise we've got to have the whole discussion again ... and I seem to remember it being long. :(

<@salimma:fedora.im>

18:18:41

yeah let's move on :)

<@salimma:fedora.im>

18:18:54

and just update the ticket if we find the previosu discussion?

<@tdawson:fedora.im>

18:19:40

Diego Herrera: Was your "yeah" meaning you had something? Or that we should move on?

<@dherrera:fedora.im>

18:20:01

yes :) it's regarding the docs PR that got merged last week

<@dherrera:fedora.im>

18:21:08

since last week the big docs PR was merged, I went through the other active PRs. Of the 4, only 2 of them weren't able to rebase cleanly (both yours Michel Lind UTC-6 ), so I wen't and rebased them in my fork if you want to continue working on them :)

<@tdawson:fedora.im>

18:21:48

Diego Herrera: Thank you for doing that.

<@salimma:fedora.im>

18:22:12

oh, thank you!

<@salimma:fedora.im>

18:22:39

I need to find time to start doing docs, been dragged into other things too much

<@dherrera:fedora.im>

18:23:10

but that's it :)

<@tdawson:fedora.im>

18:23:22

OK, moving on.

<@tdawson:fedora.im>

18:23:29

!topic General Issues / Open Floor

<@tdawson:fedora.im>

18:23:52

Does anyone have anything for Open Floor?

<@dherrera:fedora.im>

18:25:57

not on my side :)

<@salimma:fedora.im>

18:26:10

this is a quiet meeting :)

<@tdawson:fedora.im>

18:26:13

Is everyone ok with closing the meeting early?

<@tdawson:fedora.im>

18:27:08

Thank you all for comming, for the good (and short) discussions. And mostly, thank you all for all you do for EPEL and it's community.

<@tdawson:fedora.im>

18:27:17

I'll talk to ya'll next week, if not sooner.

<@zodbot:fedora.im>

18:27:24

salimma has already given cookies to tdawson during the F41 timeframe

<@zodbot:fedora.im>

18:27:29

dherrera has already given cookies to tdawson during the F41 timeframe

<@tdawson:fedora.im>

18:27:46

!endmeeting