#fedora-qa: f18beta-blocker-review-9

Meeting started by tflink at 17:03:16 UTC (full logs).

Meeting summary

  1. Roll Call (tflink, 17:03:21)
  2. Introduction (tflink, 17:13:01)
    1. Our purpose in this meeting is to review proposed blocker and nice-to-have bugs and decide whether to accept them, and to monitor the progress of fixing existing accepted blocker and nice-to-have bugs. (tflink, 17:13:50)
    2. We'll be following the process outlined at: (tflink, 17:13:57)
    3. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting (tflink, 17:13:57)
    4. The bugs up for review today are available at: (tflink, 17:14:02)
    5. http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/current (tflink, 17:14:03)
    6. The criteria for release blocking bugs can be found at: (tflink, 17:14:09)
    7. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_18_Alpha_Release_Criteria (tflink, 17:14:10)
    8. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_18_Beta_Release_Criteria (tflink, 17:14:10)
    9. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_18_Final_Release_Criteria (tflink, 17:14:10)
    10. Up for review today, there are: (tflink, 17:14:27)
    11. 4 Proposed Blockers (tflink, 17:14:33)
    12. 8 Accepted Blockers (tflink, 17:14:33)
    13. 1 Proposed NTH (tflink, 17:14:33)
    14. 22 Accepted NTH (tflink, 17:14:33)

  3. (878225) unlock of VG w/ multiple encrypted PVs in custom leads to traceback (tflink, 17:15:50)
    1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=878225 (tflink, 17:15:53)
    2. Proposed Blocker, anaconda, MODIFIED (tflink, 17:15:55)
    3. AGREED: 878225 - RejectedBlocker (beta) - This doesn't clearly hit any of the F18 beta release criterion and seems to be outside the most common paths - this doesn't prevent installs on the machine and thus, rejected as blocker (tflink, 17:24:27)

  4. (875942) KeyError: None (tflink, 17:25:32)
    1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=875942 (tflink, 17:25:33)
    2. Proposed Blocker, anaconda, MODIFIED (tflink, 17:25:33)
    3. AGREED: 875942 - RejectedBlocker (beta) - This doesn't clearly hit any of the F18 beta release criteria and seems to be outside the most common paths - this doesn't prevent installs on affected machines and thus is rejected as a blocker for F18 beta. (tflink, 17:31:02)

  5. (878967) Installation fails when selecting german language (tflink, 17:31:31)
    1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=878967 (tflink, 17:31:31)
    2. Proposed Blocker, anaconda, NEW (tflink, 17:31:31)
    3. http://fpaste.org/UE5w (adamw, 17:34:09)
    4. http://94.247.144.115/anaconda.png (tflink, 17:36:54)
    5. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=864622 seems to be a change related to man pages (drago01, 18:09:30)
    6. may be related to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=569392 (tflink, 18:20:59)
    7. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4713781 (drago01, 18:24:07)
    8. AGREED: 878967 - This could be a blocker but it needs more triage to figure out exactly what's going on and if other languages are affected. Will re-visit once more information is available. (tflink, 18:32:15)

  6. (877871) KeyError: None (tflink, 18:33:58)
    1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877871 (tflink, 18:33:58)
    2. Proposed NTH, anaconda, ASSIGNED (tflink, 18:33:58)
    3. AGREED: 877871 - RejectedNTH - This seems like a rather non-standard use case and avoidable enough to not take a fix past freeze. (tflink, 18:38:31)

  7. (878959) firewall-config can't set permanent rule (tflink, 18:38:40)
    1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=878959 (tflink, 18:38:40)
    2. Proposed NTH, firewalld, MODIFIED (tflink, 18:38:41)
    3. AGREED: 878959 - RejectedNTH - This could be fixed with an update and thus, does not need to be pulled in past freeze and does not qualify for NTH status. (tflink, 18:43:15)

  8. (868755) rsync error handling - UEFI and live installs without enough space (tflink, 18:43:50)
    1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=868755 (tflink, 18:43:54)
    2. Accepted Blocker, anaconda, MODIFIED (tflink, 18:43:56)
    3. this has been tested with RC1 and appears to have been fixed (tflink, 18:44:42)
    4. move to VERIFIED (tflink, 18:44:48)

  9. (872047) fedup-dracut builds do not exist in F18 (tflink, 18:45:10)
    1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=872047 (tflink, 18:45:10)
    2. Accepted Blocker, fedup-dracut, ON_QA (tflink, 18:45:10)
    3. builds exist in updates-testing and were pulled into RC1 (tflink, 18:45:24)
    4. builds need testing and karma (tflink, 18:45:32)

  10. (873459) Upgraded system does not reboot if a kernel upgrade is part of the upgrade (tflink, 18:47:10)
    1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=873459 (tflink, 18:47:13)
    2. Accepted Blocker, fedup-dracut, ON_QA (tflink, 18:47:16)
    3. this appears to have been fixed from limited testing (tflink, 18:48:30)
    4. it will be moved to VERIFIED if more detailed/varied testing holds up (tflink, 18:48:45)

  11. (876366) New kernel copies its args from the Upgrade System entry (tflink, 18:48:57)
    1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=876366 (tflink, 18:48:57)
    2. Accepted Blocker, fedup-dracut, MODIFIED (tflink, 18:48:57)
    3. this appears to have been fixed in limited testing (tflink, 18:49:45)
    4. will move to VERIFIED after a more detailed verification (tflink, 18:49:57)

  12. (876655) Lorax does not support building initramfs for fedup (tflink, 18:50:25)
    1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=876655 (tflink, 18:50:25)
    2. Accepted Blocker, lorax, MODIFIED (tflink, 18:50:25)
    3. RC1 does include upgrade.img built by lorax (tflink, 18:50:55)
    4. this has been fixed, moving to VERIFIED (tflink, 18:51:43)

  13. Open Floor (tflink, 18:53:52)
    1. https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/975 (nirik, 18:54:07)
    2. fesco has not yet decided whether secureboot functionality is a blocker for F18 beta (tflink, 18:54:50)
    3. https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/975 (tflink, 18:55:00)
    4. https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/974 also needs input. ;) (nirik, 18:58:14)
    5. fesco is also deciding whether to loosen the "1 week slips only" policy (tflink, 18:59:40)
    6. https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/974 (tflink, 18:59:51)
    7. input to the decision process would (probably) be appreciated by fesco (tflink, 19:00:18)
    8. The next blocker review meeting (if needed, pending go/no-go decision) will be on 2012-11-28 @ 17:00 UTC (tflink, 19:00:55)


Meeting ended at 19:01:47 UTC (full logs).

Action items

  1. (none)


People present (lines said)

  1. tflink (203)
  2. adamw (108)
  3. kparal (54)
  4. drago01 (43)
  5. jreznik (20)
  6. nirik (19)
  7. jreznik_ (11)
  8. akshayvyas (9)
  9. zodbot (5)
  10. robatino (2)
  11. satellit_e (1)


Generated by MeetBot 0.1.4.