#fedora-blocker-review: f20beta-blocker-review-6

Meeting started by kparal at 16:01:39 UTC (full logs).

Meeting summary

  1. Roll Call (kparal, 16:01:53)
  2. Introduction (kparal, 16:04:33)
    1. Our purpose in this meeting is to review proposed blocker and nice-to-have bugs and decide whether to accept them, and to monitor the progress of fixing existing accepted blocker and nice-to-have bugs. (kparal, 16:04:33)
    2. We'll be following the process outlined at: (kparal, 16:04:33)
    3. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting (kparal, 16:04:33)
    4. The bugs up for review today are available at: (kparal, 16:04:34)
    5. http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/current (kparal, 16:04:36)
    6. The criteria for release blocking bugs can be found at: (kparal, 16:04:38)
    7. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_20_Alpha_Release_Criteria (kparal, 16:04:40)
    8. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_20_Beta_Release_Criteria (kparal, 16:04:42)
    9. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_20_Final_Release_Criteria (kparal, 16:04:44)
    10. 2 Proposed Blockers (kparal, 16:04:55)
    11. 15 Accepted Blockers (kparal, 16:04:55)
    12. 0 Proposed Freeze Exceptions (kparal, 16:04:56)
    13. 14 Accepted Freeze Exceptions (kparal, 16:04:58)

  3. (1022810) error detecting raid1 thin pool layout (kparal, 16:06:01)
    1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1022810 (kparal, 16:06:01)
    2. Proposed Blocker, python-blivet, NEW (kparal, 16:06:02)
    3. AGREED: 1022810 - RejectedBlocker - The crash occurs in a very special use case when a special kind of LVM is used. It is not possible to create this LVM layout in anaconda itself, it must be pre-created in advance using other tools. We believe this is not serious enough violation to block Beta. (kparal, 16:28:31)

  4. (1023767) shim update to 0.5 fails to boot (kparal, 16:28:40)
    1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023767 (kparal, 16:28:40)
    2. Proposed Blocker, shim, NEW (kparal, 16:28:40)
    3. AGREED: 1023767 - AcceptedBlocker - This violates Beta criterion "The installer must run when launched normally from the release-blocking images." for UEFI boot for a lot of different hardware. Either fixing this or reverting to previous build is necessary. (kparal, 16:44:51)

  5. Accepted Blockers (kparal, 16:45:22)
  6. (1012504) FSError: filesystem already exists (kparal, 16:45:50)
    1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1012504 (kparal, 16:45:50)
    2. Accepted Blocker, anaconda, MODIFIED (kparal, 16:45:51)
    3. this is verified (kparal, 16:47:07)

  7. (1021890) Removing thin LV results in exception (kparal, 16:47:28)
    1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021890 (kparal, 16:47:28)
    2. Accepted Blocker, anaconda, MODIFIED (kparal, 16:47:28)
    3. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_20_Alpha_Release_Criteria#Installer_must_run (roshi, 16:48:26)
    4. this is verified (kparal, 16:48:55)

  8. (1008633) ValueError: invalid target size request (kparal, 16:49:29)
    1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1008633 (kparal, 16:49:29)
    2. Accepted Blocker, anaconda, MODIFIED (kparal, 16:49:29)
    3. this needs testing, can be tested with Live by updating anaconda from koji (kparal, 16:50:41)

  9. (1022206) ValueError: new btrfs subvols require a parent volume (kparal, 16:52:30)
    1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1022206 (kparal, 16:52:30)
    2. Accepted Blocker, anaconda, ON_QA (kparal, 16:52:30)
    3. this needs testing, can be tested with Beta TC6 (kparal, 16:54:02)

  10. (1021258) requires user manually create biosboot when using guided partitioning (kparal, 16:54:35)
    1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021258 (kparal, 16:54:35)
    2. Accepted Blocker, anaconda, MODIFIED (kparal, 16:54:35)
    3. this is verified (kparal, 16:55:21)

  11. (1021507) DeviceCreateError: ("Can't have overlapping partitions.", 'sda3') (kparal, 16:55:44)
    1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021507 (kparal, 16:55:45)
    2. Accepted Blocker, anaconda, NEW (kparal, 16:55:45)
    3. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021507#c22 (tflink, 16:59:00)
    4. Beta Blocker will be moved to 1024076. there were two issues reported at once. (kparal, 17:02:39)
    5. 1024076 seems to be fixed, but it created bug 1024144 (kparal, 17:03:52)

  12. (1024144) SizeNotPositiveError: spec= param must be >=0 (kparal, 17:08:41)
    1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1024144 (kparal, 17:08:46)
    2. we will leave 1024144 undecided for the moment, and cmurf will propose it for a blocker if he checks that this happens in common situations (no external manipulation with pools) (kparal, 17:19:07)

  13. (1010495) Apple Mac EFI: you have not created a bootloader stage1 target device (kparal, 17:21:22)
    1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010495 (kparal, 17:21:22)
    2. Accepted Blocker, anaconda, POST (kparal, 17:21:22)
    3. this can be tested with updates.img or with the next compose (kparal, 17:23:07)

  14. (1016959) ValueError: Cannot remove non-leaf device 'btrfs.14' (kparal, 17:23:42)
    1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016959 (kparal, 17:23:42)
    2. Accepted Blocker, anaconda, ASSIGNED (kparal, 17:23:42)
    3. AGREED: 1016959 - RejectedBlocker - After receiving more details about this bug, we consider this to be a corner case situation that should not block Beta. We will document this in CommonBugs. Please repropose for Final if you think it should block it. (kparal, 17:32:37)

  15. (1000891) DVD is oversized (larger than 4.7 GB) (kparal, 17:32:49)
    1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1000891 (kparal, 17:32:49)
    2. Accepted Blocker, distribution, MODIFIED (kparal, 17:32:49)
    3. this is waiting for releng to patch pungi and use it for new compose (kparal, 17:34:48)

  16. (1023250) home LV missing from /dev/mapper after install to BIOS RAID set (kparal, 17:35:16)
    1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023250 (kparal, 17:35:16)
    2. Accepted Blocker, lvm2, MODIFIED (kparal, 17:35:16)
    3. this was tested today, found another bug, fixed again (kparal, 17:36:12)
    4. this needs to be tested again (kparal, 17:36:55)

  17. (1023556) Blivet.copy does not update parted disk refs for partitions on hidden disks (kparal, 17:37:25)
    1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023556 (kparal, 17:37:25)

  18. (1023657) repoclosure failure on 20 Beta TC6 DVDs (sugar-write) (kparal, 17:42:32)
    1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023657 (kparal, 17:42:32)
    2. Accepted Blocker, sugar-write, ON_QA (kparal, 17:42:32)
    3. this should be fixed in the next compose (kparal, 17:43:28)

  19. Open Floor (kparal, 17:43:57)
    1. ACTION: pschindl to try TC6 boot on SecureBoot enabled machine (kparal, 17:45:37)


Meeting ended at 17:49:49 UTC (full logs).

Action items

  1. pschindl to try TC6 boot on SecureBoot enabled machine


Action items, by person

  1. pschindl
    1. pschindl to try TC6 boot on SecureBoot enabled machine


People present (lines said)

  1. kparal (216)
  2. cmurf (162)
  3. tflink (62)
  4. roshi (34)
  5. dlehman (17)
  6. pschindl (10)
  7. zodbot (6)
  8. penguin42 (6)
  9. bcl (3)
  10. nirik (3)
  11. satellit (1)


Generated by MeetBot 0.1.4.