#fedora-blocker-review: F21-blocker-review
Meeting started by roshi at 15:59:17 UTC
(full logs).
Meeting summary
- Roll Call (roshi, 15:59:18)
- Introduction (roshi, 16:01:23)
- Our purpose in this meeting is to review
proposed blocker and nice-to-have bugs and decide whether to accept
them, and to monitor the progress of fixing existing accepted
blocker and nice-to-have bugs. (roshi,
16:01:23)
- We'll be following the process outlined
at: (roshi,
16:01:27)
- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting
(roshi,
16:01:29)
- The bugs up for review today are available
at: (roshi,
16:01:32)
- http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/current
(roshi,
16:01:34)
- The criteria for release blocking bugs can be
found at: (roshi,
16:01:37)
- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_21_Alpha_Release_Criteria
(roshi,
16:01:40)
- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_21_Beta_Release_Criteria
(roshi,
16:01:42)
- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_21_Final_Release_Criteria
(roshi,
16:01:45)
- https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/bash-4.2.47-2.fc19
(mattdm,
16:02:33)
- (1114786) DeviceError: ('cannot replace active format', 'sda6') (roshi, 16:04:14)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1114786
(roshi,
16:04:17)
- Proposed Blocker, anaconda, NEW (roshi,
16:04:20)
- ACTION: adamw to look
deeper into #1114786 causes (adamw,
16:20:07)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1116659
(adamw,
16:22:43)
- Proposed Blocker, anaconda, NEW (adamw,
16:22:43)
- (1116659) unable to set mount point because the field is grayed out (adamw, 16:34:48)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1116659
(adamw,
16:34:48)
- Proposed Blocker, anaconda, NEW (adamw,
16:34:48)
- http://ur1.ca/i8i4t (kparal,
16:42:30)
- AGREED: - 1116659 -
RejectedBlocker - This bug report seems to be an oversight by the
reporter. If there's more to this bug please re-propose.
(roshi,
16:49:36)
- (1128605) anconda crash when trying to custom partitioning after do an automatically partitioning (roshi, 16:49:39)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1128605
(roshi,
16:49:42)
- Proposed Blocker, anaconda, NEW (roshi,
16:49:45)
- AGREED: - 1128605 -
Mark as Duplicate of 1121183 (roshi,
16:56:18)
- (1121383) ValueError: specified lv is not part of this vg (roshi, 16:56:57)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1121383
(roshi,
16:56:57)
- Proposed Blocker, python-blivet, POST
(roshi,
16:56:57)
- AGREED: - 1121383 -
AcceptedBlocker - This bug is really easy to hit and violates Beta
custom partitioning criteria. (roshi,
17:02:19)
- (1129629) Anaconda doesn't recognize insufficient size of /boot partition (roshi, 17:02:27)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1129629
(roshi,
17:02:30)
- Proposed Blocker, anaconda, MODIFIED
(roshi,
17:02:32)
- AGREED: - 1129629 -
AcceptedBlocker - This bug is a clear violation of the Beta Custom
partitioning criteria: "Reject or disallow invalid disk and volume
configurations without crashing." (roshi,
17:09:44)
- (1138967) UI won't permit adding new mountpoint to existing Btrfs, nor creation of a new filesystem to replace it (roshi, 17:09:58)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1138967
(roshi,
17:10:01)
- Proposed Blocker, anaconda, NEW (roshi,
17:10:04)
- (1141707) DeviceFactoryError: new size must of type Size (roshi, 17:12:46)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141707
(roshi,
17:12:46)
- Proposed Blocker, anaconda, ASSIGNED
(roshi,
17:12:47)
- AGREED: - 1141707 -
AcceptedBlocker - This is a clear blocker violating the Beta
criterion: "must be able to remove existing volumes." (roshi,
17:17:23)
- (1142439) 'unable to allocate requested partition scheme' when adding biosboot partition (roshi, 17:17:43)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1142439
(roshi,
17:17:46)
- Proposed Blocker, anaconda, NEW (roshi,
17:17:49)
- AGREED: - 1142439 -
RejectedBlocker - This bug doesn't really violate any criteria but
would be good to fix the display of free space. (roshi,
17:31:53)
- (1143849) trapped in a loop of "DISK ENCRYPTION PASSPHRASE" dialog when partitioning (roshi, 17:32:33)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1143849
(roshi,
17:32:36)
- Proposed Blocker, anaconda, NEW (roshi,
17:32:39)
- AGREED: - 1143849 -
RejectedBlocker - We can't reproduce this bug. Please test again and
repropose with reproduction steps if it persists. (roshi,
17:39:55)
- (1143864) unable to do manual partitioning (roshi, 17:40:29)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1143864
(roshi,
17:40:29)
- Proposed Blocker, anaconda, ASSIGNED
(roshi,
17:40:29)
- AGREED: - 1143864 -
AcceptedBlocker - This bug violates the Beta Custom partitioning
criteria: "Correctly interpret, and modify as described below, any
disk with a valid ms-dos or gpt disk label and partition table
containing ext4 partitions, LVM and/or btrfs volumes, and/or
software RAID..." (roshi,
17:53:26)
- (1143972) Anaconda doesn't show correct amount of free space when using disk with mbr and three partitions already existings (roshi, 17:53:38)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1143972
(roshi,
17:53:41)
- Proposed Blocker, anaconda, NEW (roshi,
17:53:44)
- AGREED: - 1143972 -
AcceptedBlocker - This bug violates the beta guided partitioning
criteria: "Cleanly install to a disk with a valid ms-dos or gpt disk
label and partition table which contains existing data and
sufficient unpartitioned space for a Fedora installation."
(roshi,
18:06:07)
- (1144520) autopart is always pre-selected upon entry to the storage spoke (roshi, 18:06:26)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1144520
(roshi,
18:06:29)
- Proposed Blocker, anaconda, ASSIGNED
(roshi,
18:06:32)
- AGREED: - 1144520 -
RejectedBlocker - This bug is an oddity that doesn't actually
violate a criteria but still works as intended if you don't enter
the spoke. (roshi,
18:19:56)
- (1144560) installer tries to apply custom kickstart layout again when user visits storage spoke (roshi, 18:20:16)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1144560
(roshi,
18:20:19)
- Proposed Blocker, anaconda, ASSIGNED
(roshi,
18:20:22)
- (1146101) when boot partition have another systems and not enough space, the installer "succeed" and break all previous iniramfs (roshi, 18:22:40)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1146101
(roshi,
18:22:43)
- Proposed Blocker, anaconda, NEW (roshi,
18:22:46)
- AGREED: - 1146101 -
RejectedBlocker - This bug doesn't directly violate any
criteria. (roshi,
19:00:51)
- If you have spare cycles, go through the
remaining blockers and vote before next meeting (roshi,
19:01:53)
Meeting ended at 19:04:39 UTC
(full logs).
Action items
- adamw to look deeper into #1114786 causes
Action items, by person
- adamw
- adamw to look deeper into #1114786 causes
People present (lines said)
- adamw (217)
- roshi (184)
- kparal (101)
- dlehman (57)
- jreznik_ (11)
- roshi_displaced (10)
- jskladan (9)
- bitlord (8)
- tflink (7)
- zodbot (7)
- pschindl (6)
- mattdm (4)
- satellit (2)
- danofsatx-work (1)
- threebean (1)
- jreznik (1)
Generated by MeetBot 0.1.4.