#fedora-meeting-2: F21 Alpha Go/No-Go meeting - 3

Meeting summary

1. Roll Call (jreznik, 17:01:57)
   
2. Purpose of this meeting (jreznik, 17:07:44)
   1. Purpose of this meeting is to see whether or not F21 Alpha is ready for shipment, according to the release criteria. (jreznik, 17:07:46)
   2. This is determined in a few ways: (jreznik, 17:07:47)
   3. No remaining blocker bugs (jreznik, 17:07:49)
   4. Release candidate compose is available (jreznik, 17:07:50)
   5. Test matrices for Alpha are fully completed (jreznik, 17:07:52)
   6. http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/milestone/21/alpha/buglist (jreznik, 17:07:53)
   7. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_21_Alpha_RC1_Install (jreznik, 17:07:55)
   8. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_21_Alpha_RC1_Base (jreznik, 17:07:56)
   9. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_21_Alpha_RC1_Desktop (jreznik, 17:07:58)
   10. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_21_Alpha_RC1_Server (jreznik, 17:07:59)
   
   
3. (1101341) Rescue a Fedora system from grub menu doesn't launch anaconda rescue mode (roshi, 17:09:01)
   1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1101341 (roshi, 17:09:04)
   2. Proposed Blocker, anaconda, MODIFIED (roshi, 17:09:07)
   3. https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=QA:ReleaseCriteria&oldid=18834 (adamw, 17:15:11)
   4. AGREED: move resuce mode criteria to being a Beta blocker from Alpha Blocker (dgilmore, 17:27:51)
   5. AGREED: - 1101341 - AcceptedBlocker - This bug is a clear blocker of the written criteria. However, it was decided to move the criteria to the Beta milestone as it better fits our understanding of the typical use case (roshi, 17:29:51)
   
   
4. (1143990) Fedora Server is missing the adcli command on default install (roshi, 17:30:05)
   1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1143990 (roshi, 17:30:08)
   2. Proposed Blocker, comps, MODIFIED (roshi, 17:30:11)
   3. AGREED: - 1143990 - RejectedBlocker - While this bug seems to be a blocker, there are workarounds which make it possible to join AD domains. The fix will land in Beta TCs. The workarounds will be documented on Common Bugs. (roshi, 17:37:16)
   
   
5. (1142949) ABRT is not downloading debuginfo packages (roshi, 17:37:49)
   1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1142949 (roshi, 17:37:49)
   2. Proposed Blocker, rpm, MODIFIED (roshi, 17:37:49)
   3. AGREED: - 1142949 - RejectedBlocker - This bug violates no criteria and is easily remedied with an update post-install. (roshi, 17:40:17)
   
   
6. Blocker bugs status (jreznik, 17:54:16)
   1. AGREED: - 1138015 - Close this bug and note that it hasn't been seen. (roshi, 17:54:30)
   2. all Fedora 21 Alpha accepted blocker bugs are resolved (jreznik, 17:56:09)
   
   
7. Test matrices coverage (jreznik, 17:59:37)
   1. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_desktop_updates (adamw, 18:04:30)
   2. test matrices coverage is good for Alpha, SAS is waived on the basis of hardware exotic-ness (jreznik, 18:15:51)
   
   
8. Fedora 21 Alpha Go/No-Go decision (jreznik, 18:18:36)
   1. release engineering is go (jreznik, 18:22:18)
   2. engineering is go (jreznik, 18:23:13)
   3. QA is go (jreznik, 18:24:05)
   4. AGREED: Fedora Release Engineering, Engineering and QA are Go for Fedora 21 Alpha RC1 (jreznik, 18:25:52)
   5. ACTION: jreznik to announce Go/No-Go meeting result and to help to coordinate release on Tuesday (jreznik, 18:28:15)
   
   
9. Open floor (jreznik, 18:28:30)

Action items

1. jreznik to announce Go/No-Go meeting result and to help to coordinate release on Tuesday

Action items, by person

1. jreznik
   1. jreznik to announce Go/No-Go meeting result and to help to coordinate release on Tuesday

People present (lines said)

1. jreznik (124)
2. roshi (101)
3. adamw (97)
4. dgilmore (64)
5. sgallagh (60)
6. mattdm (24)
7. Southern_Gentlem (20)
8. nirik (17)
9. zodbot (17)
10. danofsatx (16)
11. kalev (15)
12. jwb (12)
13. stickster (10)
14. oddshocks (8)
15. satellit (8)
16. pwhalen (7)
17. jsmith (2)
18. pwhalen_ (1)