17:00:30 <roshi> #startmeeting F22-blocker-review
17:00:30 <zodbot> Meeting started Mon Feb 23 17:00:30 2015 UTC.  The chair is roshi. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
17:00:30 <zodbot> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic.
17:00:30 <roshi> #meetingname F22-blocker-review
17:00:30 <zodbot> The meeting name has been set to 'f22-blocker-review'
17:00:30 <roshi> #topic Roll Call
17:00:58 * kparal is here as a back up for pschindl, who might appear later
17:01:34 * roshi is here as a backup for himself
17:01:47 <adamw> ahoy
17:01:52 * jreznik is here (no backup)
17:02:02 * adamw is available as a backup for his robot colada
17:02:50 <roshi> well, we've got 4/2/0 for today
17:03:03 <roshi> and one I have yet to file that we can talk about in Open Florr
17:03:50 <roshi> #topic Introduction
17:03:50 <roshi> Why are we here?
17:03:50 <roshi> #info Our purpose in this meeting is to review proposed blocker and nice-to-have bugs and decide whether to accept them, and to monitor the progress of fixing existing accepted blocker and nice-to-have bugs.
17:03:54 <roshi> #info We'll be following the process outlined at:
17:03:57 <roshi> #link https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting
17:03:59 <roshi> #info The bugs up for review today are available at:
17:04:02 <roshi> #link http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/current
17:04:04 <roshi> #info The criteria for release blocking bugs can be found at:
17:04:07 <roshi> #link https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_22_Alpha_Release_Criteria
17:04:10 <roshi> #link https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_22_Beta_Release_Criteria
17:04:13 <roshi> #link https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_22_Final_Release_Criteria
17:04:56 <roshi> onto the alpha blockers
17:04:57 <roshi> #topic (1194490) Recent cloud builds fail to boot with kernel panic
17:05:00 <roshi> #link https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194490
17:05:02 <roshi> #info Proposed Blocker, distribution, NEW
17:05:46 <roshi> +1 from me
17:06:44 <kparal> seems clear +1
17:06:53 <jreznik> yep, +1
17:07:38 * pschindl is here
17:07:39 <roshi> proposed #agreed - 1194490 - AcceptedBlocker Alpha - This violates the "Release blocking images must boot" Alpha criterion: All release-blocking images must boot in their supported configurations.
17:07:47 <roshi> welcome pschindl :)
17:07:50 <adamw> ack
17:08:03 <danofsatx> ack
17:08:09 <kparal> ack
17:08:10 * danofsatx finally showed up
17:08:13 <roshi> #agreed - 1194490 - AcceptedBlocker Alpha - This violates the "Release blocking images must boot" Alpha criterion: All release-blocking images must boot in their supported configurations.
17:08:20 <roshi> #topic (1194948) gnome-initial-setup fails to start after Fedora 22 Workstation 2015-02-18 install
17:08:23 <roshi> #link https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194948
17:08:26 <roshi> #info Proposed Blocker, gdm, NEW
17:08:31 <danofsatx> I was nuking my apple fritter and refilling the coffee carafe, sorry ;)
17:09:40 <roshi> np np :)
17:09:47 <roshi> +1 for me
17:09:53 <roshi> looks like it's getting worked on too
17:10:24 <kparal> +1
17:10:47 <danofsatx> +1
17:10:55 <adamw> i suppose i should make it clear this doesn't mean 'it skips g-i-s and boots to something else', but 'it just sits there at the boot screen' :) (unless you ctrl-alt-f2)
17:10:55 <jreznik> +1
17:11:03 <pschindl> +1
17:11:28 <adamw> is someone secretaryizing?
17:11:39 <roshi> proposed #agreed - 1194948 - AcceptedBlocker Alpha - This bug is a clear violation of the Alpha criterion: "A system installed with a release-blocking desktop must boot to a log in screen where it is possible to log in to a working desktop using a user account created during installation or a 'first boot' utility."
17:11:48 <roshi> volunteers?
17:12:31 <danofsatx> ack
17:12:40 <danofsatx> do ya trust me?
17:13:12 <roshi> sure - it's only the fate of the universe
17:13:14 <roshi> :p
17:13:40 <jreznik> ack
17:14:13 <adamw> danofsatx: we'll give you one last shot, kid
17:14:14 <adamw> :P
17:14:37 * danofsatx is a good at not repeating screw ups
17:14:46 <roshi> #agreed - 1194948 - AcceptedBlocker Alpha - This bug is a clear violation of the Alpha criterion: "A system installed with a release-blocking desktop must boot to a log in screen where it is possible to log in to a working desktop using a user account created during installation or a 'first boot' utility."
17:15:06 <roshi> #topic (1185585) anaconda crashes after continuing from language selection screen
17:15:09 <danofsatx> I'm also good at finding new ways to screw up, though ;)
17:15:09 <roshi> #link https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185585
17:15:12 <roshi> #info Proposed Blocker, gtk3, NEW
17:15:30 <roshi> that's a good QA talent methinks
17:15:33 <roshi> :p
17:15:39 <danofsatx> +1
17:16:14 <kparal> +1
17:16:20 <pschindl> +1
17:16:24 <roshi> +1
17:16:24 <adamw> yeah, +1, seems a lot of people running into this or something that looks like it
17:17:05 <roshi> proposed #agreed - 1185585 - AcceptedBlocker Alpha - This bug is a clear violation of the Alpha criterion: "When using a dedicated installer image, the installer must be able to complete an installation using the text, graphical and VNC installation interfaces."
17:17:10 <kparal> good to know someone is still using (and testing) 32b
17:17:51 <kparal> ack
17:18:06 <jreznik> ack
17:18:30 <danofsatx> ack
17:18:36 <roshi> #agreed - 1185585 - AcceptedBlocker Alpha - This bug is a clear violation of the Alpha criterion: "When using a dedicated installer image, the installer must be able to complete an installation using the text, graphical and VNC installation interfaces."
17:18:43 <roshi> #topic (1193127) dhclient is started by NetworkManager at disconnection instead of at connection time
17:18:46 <roshi> #link https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1193127
17:18:49 <roshi> #info Proposed Blocker, NetworkManager, NEW
17:19:53 <adamw> i'm not super sure about this one
17:20:04 <adamw> doesn't seem to have affected any of my VM installs, which use 'wired networking'
17:20:08 <adamw> nor is it affecting my desktop
17:20:17 <roshi> cloud images haven't been getting an IP on the recent builds
17:20:24 <roshi> so I wonder if this might be the same thing
17:20:34 <roshi> kushal: you around?
17:20:50 <adamw> roshi: when you say 'recent', how recent?
17:20:57 <roshi> last weeks
17:21:08 <adamw> cases of this kinda thing from a few days ago are strongly likely to be related to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1116651
17:21:18 <adamw> but if they're older than that, no...
17:21:19 <roshi> saw it on a couple of my custom builds (the ones that built at all, that is)
17:21:55 <kushal> roshi, yes
17:22:16 <roshi> kushal, does the no IP on cloud images resemble the but listed in the topic?
17:22:24 <roshi> s/but/bug/
17:22:54 <roshi> at this point I'd say punt and test - vote in bug
17:23:05 <danofsatx> ack
17:23:06 <kushal> looks like so.
17:23:25 <danofsatx> erm, +1 punt
17:23:26 <roshi> is /etc/resolv.conf persent on the cloud images?
17:23:37 <roshi> the bug adamw  linked in: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1116651
17:23:53 <jreznik> pavlix wants to retest it, so punt?
17:24:20 <kushal> roshi,  that is not the case iirc
17:24:36 <roshi> ok, thanks kushal :)
17:24:40 <roshi> +1 punt
17:24:46 <kushal> punt means?
17:25:12 <roshi> proposed #agreed - 1116651 - Punt - We'll wait to decide on this bug until we get more testing done.
17:25:18 <roshi> just wait a bit to do more testing
17:25:38 <jreznik> ack
17:25:44 <danofsatx> ack
17:26:05 <roshi> punt is a rugby/US football term referring to kicking the ball forward when you can't make a more traditional play
17:26:13 <adamw> ack
17:26:23 <pschindl> ack
17:26:31 <roshi> #agreed - 1116651 - Punt - We'll wait to decide on this bug until we get more testing done.
17:26:53 <roshi> #topic (1194494) 22 Branched installer images consider $releasever to be 'rawhide', not 22, and so install Rawhide packages
17:26:55 <roshi> #link https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194494
17:26:58 <roshi> #info Proposed Blocker, anaconda, MODIFIED
17:27:04 <roshi> first of two Beta proposals
17:28:30 <pschindl> +1
17:28:59 <roshi> +1 - but not sure which criteria
17:29:07 <adamw> the criterion cited is fine for beta, i think?
17:29:09 <roshi> ahm there it is
17:29:10 <kparal> +1
17:29:14 <danofsatx> +1
17:29:17 <pschindl> I think that cited one is good
17:29:18 <jreznik> +1
17:29:22 <adamw> i wondered if anyone would want to make this alpha, but looks like it's getting fixed anyhow.
17:29:29 * roshi was looking for the blockerbugs boilerplate in a comment
17:30:12 <roshi> proposed #agreed - 1194494 - AcceptedBlocker Beta - This bug is a clear violation of the Beta criterion: "When installing with a dedicated installer image for a specific Fedora flavor, the default package set must be the correct set for that flavor."
17:30:23 <jreznik> ack
17:30:47 <danofsatx> ack
17:31:00 <roshi> #agreed - 1194494 - AcceptedBlocker Beta - This bug is a clear violation of the Beta criterion: "When installing with a dedicated installer image for a specific Fedora flavor, the default package set must be the correct set for that flavor."
17:31:08 <roshi> #topic (1185136) blank screen after logging in
17:31:08 <roshi> #link https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185136
17:31:08 <roshi> #info Proposed Blocker, cockpit, NEW
17:31:34 <adamw> as described, +1
17:31:42 <adamw> haven't got around to reproducing it myself yet
17:32:00 <danofsatx> +1, but I wonder about the assigned person - shouldn't it be stefw or andreasen?
17:32:17 <roshi> +1
17:32:43 * kparal switches to lurking mode
17:33:55 <pschindl> +1
17:34:18 <adamw> stef's in the CC...
17:34:20 <roshi> proposed #agreed - 1185136 - AcceptedBlocker Beta - This bug is a clear violation of the Beta criterion: "It must be possible to log in to the default Cockpit instance and use it to: View the system's logs; View the system's running services; Enrol the system to a FreeIPA or Active Directory domain."
17:34:32 <adamw> the assignment appears to be the default one, no record of it being reassigned
17:34:50 <adamw> ack
17:35:47 <danofsatx> ack
17:36:13 <jreznik> ack
17:36:24 <roshi> #agreed - 1185136 - AcceptedBlocker Beta - This bug is a clear violation of the Beta criterion: "It must be possible to log in to the default Cockpit instance and use it to: View the system's logs; View the system's running services; Enrol the system to a FreeIPA or Active Directory domain."
17:36:32 <roshi> #topic Open Floor
17:37:55 <adamw> so we have TC4 images (I missed the ticket being closed on saturday - whoops) but dgilmore says there's some kind of issue with them
17:38:11 <adamw> so we'd best leave the 'current' event as 02-18 while he looks into that
17:38:28 <roshi> sounds like a plan to me
17:38:36 <adamw> the 02-21 nightly boot.iso fixes the $releasever bug, if anyone needs one that really does 22 not rawhide
17:41:13 <roshi> good to know
17:41:22 <roshi> anybody have anything else?
17:41:40 * roshi or kushal will do some more testing on the cloud bug I mentioned and update that bug or nominate another
17:42:05 * roshi sets the fuse....
17:42:06 <roshi> 3...
17:43:02 <adamw> alpha freeze is tomorrow, so we need to start cracking some heads on the fixes
17:43:06 <roshi> 2...
17:43:12 <roshi> yeah
17:43:18 <roshi> who's the head headcracker?
17:44:46 <roshi> 1...
17:44:49 * jreznik is preparing his headcracking tool
17:45:30 <roshi> sounds like a plan :)
17:45:34 <roshi> thanks for coming folks!
17:45:39 <roshi> #endmeeting