#fedora-blocker-review: F22-blocker-review
Meeting started by roshi at 16:02:18 UTC
(full logs).
Meeting summary
- Roll Call (roshi, 16:02:19)
- Introduction (roshi, 16:03:35)
- Our purpose in this meeting is to review
proposed blocker and nice-to-have bugs and decide whether to accept
them, and to monitor the progress of fixing existing accepted
blocker and nice-to-have bugs. (roshi,
16:03:36)
- We'll be following the process outlined
at: (roshi,
16:03:39)
- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting
(roshi,
16:03:42)
- The bugs up for review today are available
at: (roshi,
16:03:45)
- http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/current
(roshi,
16:03:47)
- The criteria for release blocking bugs can be
found at: (roshi,
16:03:49)
- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_22_Alpha_Release_Criteria
(roshi,
16:03:52)
- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_22_Beta_Release_Criteria
(roshi,
16:03:55)
- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_22_Final_Release_Criteria
(roshi,
16:03:58)
- (1160917) fedora-release-(product) conflicts when installing environment groups which specify a different product to the currently-installed one (roshi, 16:05:17)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1160917
(roshi,
16:05:20)
- Proposed Blocker, distribution, NEW
(roshi,
16:05:23)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/showdependencytree.cgi?id=1160917&hide_resolved=1
(kparal,
16:08:43)
- This bug (1160917) wasn't actually proposed as
a blocker, skipping (roshi,
16:19:33)
- (1204739) Installing Fedora Server netinst ends up with blocked Cockpit port (roshi, 16:19:36)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1204739
(roshi,
16:19:39)
- Proposed Blocker, fedora-release,
ASSIGNED (roshi,
16:19:43)
- AGREED: - 1204739 -
AcceptedBlocker Beta - This bug is a clear violation of the
criterion: "After system installation without explicit firewall
configuration, the system firewall must be active on all
non-loopback interfaces. The only ports which may be open to
incoming traffic are port 22 (ssh), port 9090 (Cockpit web
interface)" (roshi,
16:27:34)
- (864198) grubby fatal error updating grub.cfg when /boot is btrfs (roshi, 16:27:59)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=864198
(roshi,
16:28:02)
- Proposed Blocker, grubby, ASSIGNED (roshi,
16:28:04)
- https://github.com/rhinstaller/anaconda/pull/41
is the recent pr for this (adamw,
16:31:16)
- AGREED: - 864198 -
Punt - We're going to delay making a decision on this bug until it
can be clarified by the reporter as to what exactly is
desired. (roshi,
16:42:14)
- (1204612) eth0 is going missing in the cloud images (roshi, 16:42:17)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1204612
(roshi,
16:42:19)
- Proposed Blocker, initscripts, NEW (roshi,
16:42:22)
- AGREED: - 1204612 -
AcceptedBlocker Beta - This bug violates the alpha criterion: "The
installed system must be able to download and install updates with
the default console package manager." (roshi,
16:50:26)
- (1201897) SIGSEGV in libedit call in installer (roshi, 16:50:36)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1201897
(roshi,
16:50:36)
- Proposed Blocker, libedit, NEW (roshi,
16:50:37)
- AGREED: - 1201897 -
AcceptedBlocker - This bug is a clear violation of the following
criterion: "When using a dedicated installer image, the installer
must be able to complete an installation using the text, graphical
and VNC installation interfaces." (roshi,
16:58:43)
- (1204031) 22 Beta TC3 install images do not bring up network (unless updates image or kickstart used) (roshi, 16:58:59)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1204031
(roshi,
16:59:02)
- Proposed Blocker, lorax, ON_QA (roshi,
16:59:05)
- AGREED: - 1204031 -
AcceptedBlocker - This bug is a clear violation of the following
criterion: "When using a release-blocking dedicated installer image,
the installer must be able to use either HTTP or FTP repositories
(or both) as package sources. Release-blocking network install
images must default to a valid publicly-accessible package
source." (roshi,
17:04:13)
- (1201120) DeviceTreeError: could not find parent for subvol (roshi, 17:04:34)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1201120
(roshi,
17:04:37)
- Proposed Blocker, python-blivet,
ASSIGNED (roshi,
17:04:40)
- AGREED: - 1201120 -
AcceptedBlocker Beta - This bug violates the following criterion:
"When using the custom partitioning flow, the installer must be able
to: Correctly interpret ... btrfs volumes." (roshi,
17:14:04)
- (1204408) local variable 'app' referenced before assignment (roshi, 17:14:32)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1204408
(roshi,
17:14:35)
- Proposed Blocker, gnome-abrt, NEW (roshi,
17:14:37)
- AGREED: - 1204408 -
AcceptedBlocker Final - This bug is a clear violation of the
following criterion: "All applications that can be launched using
the standard graphical mechanism of a release-blocking desktop after
a default installation of that desktop must start successfully and
withstand a basic functionality test." (roshi,
17:17:22)
- Open Floor (roshi, 17:17:44)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1204883
(kinokoio,
17:19:15)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1204546
(Corey84,
17:19:44)
- (1204546) LUKSError: luks device not configured (roshi, 17:23:00)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1204546
(roshi,
17:23:03)
- http://ur1.ca/jyuje <~ the
offending code in blivet (Corey84,
17:27:04)
- AGREED: - 1204546 -
Punt - We'll delay deliberation on this bug until there's more
documentation and discuss either in bug or at the next
meeting (roshi,
17:35:54)
- Open Floor (roshi, 17:36:08)
Meeting ended at 17:38:51 UTC
(full logs).
Action items
- (none)
People present (lines said)
- roshi (148)
- adamw (86)
- Corey84 (44)
- kparal (38)
- kinokoio (31)
- sgallagh (27)
- danofsatx (15)
- jreznik (12)
- zodbot (8)
- kushal (5)
- nirik (2)
Generated by MeetBot 0.1.4.