#fedora-blocker-review: F22-blocker-review
Meeting started by adamw at 16:24:46 UTC
(full logs).
Meeting summary
- Roll Call (adamw, 16:24:47)
- Introduction (adamw, 16:27:13)
- Our purpose in this meeting is to review
proposed blocker and nice-to-have bugs and decide whether to accept
them, and to monitor the progress of fixing existing accepted
blocker and nice-to-have bugs. (adamw,
16:27:13)
- We'll be following the process outlined
at: (adamw,
16:27:13)
- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting
(adamw,
16:27:13)
- The bugs up for review today are available
at: (adamw,
16:27:15)
- http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/current
(adamw,
16:27:17)
- The criteria for release blocking bugs can be
found at: (adamw,
16:27:19)
- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_22_Alpha_Release_Criteria
(adamw,
16:27:21)
- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_22_Beta_Release_Criteria
(adamw,
16:27:23)
- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_22_Final_Release_Criteria
(adamw,
16:27:25)
- 9 Proposed Blockers (adamw,
16:27:29)
- 11 Accepted Blockers (adamw,
16:27:29)
- 1 Proposed Freeze Exceptions (adamw,
16:27:31)
- 3 Accepted Freeze Exceptions (adamw,
16:27:33)
- oddshocks will secretarialize, adamw will check
his work (adamw,
16:31:06)
- (1211122) No closest mirror can be found from behind a proxy (adamw, 16:32:11)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1211122
(adamw,
16:32:11)
- Proposed Blocker, anaconda, POST (adamw,
16:32:12)
- AGREED: 1211122 -
RejectedBlocker - this is a problem for those using proxies, but it
would be sufficiently workaroundable. (In practice the fix is
landing anyway.) (adamw,
16:58:12)
- (1211746) ValueError: new size is too large (adamw, 16:58:23)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1211746
(adamw,
16:58:23)
- Proposed Blocker, anaconda, ASSIGNED
(adamw,
16:58:23)
- AGREED: 1211746 -
AcceptedBlocker - accepted as a blocker as a violation of "When
using the custom partitioning flow, the installer must be able to:
Reject or disallow invalid disk and volume configurations without
crashing." (adamw,
17:07:59)
- (1214441) btrfs raid1 fails to boot after successful installation (adamw, 17:08:07)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1214441
(adamw,
17:08:07)
- Proposed Blocker, anaconda, NEW (adamw,
17:08:07)
- AGREED: 1214441 -
RejectedBlocker - this is in a fairly uncommonly used configuration
(btrfs RAID) and there is a simple workaround (using the non-live
installer). we believe documenting the workaround is sufficient to
deal with this case. (adamw,
17:19:09)
- (1210047) [abrt] gnome-contacts: _g_log_abort(): gnome-contacts-search-provider killed by SIGTRAP (adamw, 17:19:34)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210047
(adamw,
17:19:34)
- Proposed Blocker, gnome-contacts, NEW
(adamw,
17:19:34)
- AGREED: 1210047 -
RejectedBlocker - this does not seem to be occurring frequently
enough (given the data we have) to be a blocker (the point of the
criterion is not to look unprofessional by triggering crashes on all
installs; this seems to happen only rarely) (adamw,
17:26:56)
- (1211948) Help with packagekit api (adamw, 17:27:28)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1211948
(adamw,
17:27:29)
- Proposed Blocker, gnome-software, NEW
(adamw,
17:27:29)
- AGREED: 1211948 -
RejectedBlocker - this is certainly a significant bug that should be
treated with priority, but it does not seem to be worth blocking the
release for. It could be satisfactorily fixed with a post-release
update if it cannot be fixed before release. If a fix appears after
the Final freeze we would be willing to consider freeze exception
status. (adamw,
17:34:13)
- (1215839) kernel panic on first boot of newly installed system, missing initrd line in grub.cfg (adamw, 17:34:23)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215839
(adamw,
17:34:24)
- Proposed Blocker, grubby, NEW (adamw,
17:34:24)
- AGREED: 1215839 -
AcceptedBlocker - violates e.g. "A system installed with a
release-blocking desktop must boot to a log in screen where it is
possible to log in to a working desktop using a user account created
during installation or a 'first boot' utility." (adamw,
17:38:14)
- (1211978) mock does not use "yum-deprecated" if yum >= 3.4.3-505 is installed (adamw, 17:38:21)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1211978
(adamw,
17:38:21)
- Proposed Blocker, mock, MODIFIED (adamw,
17:38:22)
- AGREED: 1211978 -
RejectedBlocker - we're not aware of any case where this bug affects
release critical or critpath stuff, so it could be fixed as a
regular update if necessary. (adamw,
17:46:12)
- (1160424) MDRaidError: name_from_md_node(md126p1) failed (adamw, 17:46:27)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1160424
(adamw,
17:46:27)
- Proposed Blocker, python-blivet,
ASSIGNED (adamw,
17:46:27)
- AGREED: 1160424 -
RejectedBlocker - this is a worrying bug but so far it has been
difficult to pin down and appears to only affect RAID sets in
specific states. If more details emerge that indicate it is very
commonly encountered by those attempting to install on firmware
RAID, we will reconsider it. (adamw,
18:05:17)
- (1214241) KeyError: 'fedora-pool' (adamw, 18:05:55)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1214241
(adamw,
18:05:55)
- Proposed Blocker, python-blivet, POST
(adamw,
18:05:56)
- AGREED: 1214241 -
AcceptedBlocker - violates "The installer must be able to create and
install to any workable partition layout using any file system
and/or container format combination offered in a default installer
configuration." (adamw,
18:13:45)
- moving on to accepted blocker review
(adamw,
18:17:27)
- (1212206) System doesn't boot with LVM data volume on iSCSI (adamw, 18:17:29)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1212206
(adamw,
18:17:29)
- Accepted Blocker, anaconda, MODIFIED
(adamw,
18:17:29)
- this is probably fixed in the pending anaconda
update (and hence will be in Final TC1), the update just needs
editing to list it (adamw,
18:18:21)
- (1209941) upgraded system does not reboot automatically, ctrl+alt+del is needed: Failed unmounting /sysroot/proc (adamw, 18:18:28)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1209941
(adamw,
18:18:28)
- Accepted Blocker, fedup-dracut, NEW
(adamw,
18:18:28)
- lots of activity from reporters here, but
little from the developer (adamw,
18:24:02)
- ACTION: secretary to
post a comment pinging the dev and asking for status (adamw,
18:24:13)
- (1166650) [abrt] liveusb-creator: connection.py:651:call_blocking:DBusException: org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.UnknownMethod: Method "Get" with signature "ss" on interface "org.freedesktop.DBus.Properties" doesn't exist (adamw, 18:24:32)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1166650
(adamw,
18:24:33)
- Accepted Blocker, liveusb-creator, NEW
(adamw,
18:24:33)
- we haven't yet heard from the developer about
this one (adamw,
18:30:14)
- ACTION: secretary to
post a comment requesting status from the developer (adamw,
18:30:21)
- (1206760) Plasma desktop doesn't notify for available updates (adamw, 18:30:31)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206760
(adamw,
18:30:32)
- Accepted Blocker, plasma-pk-updates,
ASSIGNED (adamw,
18:30:32)
- KDE team is aware and actively working on this
bug, no action necessary (adamw,
18:32:32)
- (1200161) Non-Fatal SELINUX Faults exist during bootup of 22_Alpha_RC3 (adamw, 18:32:40)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1200161
(adamw,
18:32:40)
- Accepted Blocker, rng-tools, NEW (adamw,
18:32:40)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1172235
(adamw,
18:35:12)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1181308
is the 'parent' execmod-on-rngd bug (adamw,
18:36:17)
- this is fairly old and may well be fixed
already (adamw,
18:39:18)
- ACTION: secretary to
ask reporter whether the first AVC is still a problem on 22 Beta or
Final TC1 (adamw,
18:39:38)
- (1190377) SELinux is preventing polkitd from 'read' accesses on the lnk_file localtime. (adamw, 18:39:58)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190377
(adamw,
18:39:58)
- Accepted Blocker, systemd, NEW (adamw,
18:39:58)
- this bug seems fairly active with input from
devs and testers, no action needed (adamw,
18:44:55)
- (1200559) [abrt] totem: browse_cb(): totem killed by SIGABRT (adamw, 18:45:21)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1200559
(adamw,
18:45:21)
- Accepted Blocker, totem, NEW (adamw,
18:45:22)
- no response from the developer yet (adamw,
18:49:46)
- ACTION: secretary to
post comment asking dev for status (adamw,
18:50:11)
- Open floor (adamw, 18:51:09)
- ACTION: roshi to
re-check #1210047 on current i386 images (adamw,
19:00:00)
Meeting ended at 19:05:37 UTC
(full logs).
Action items
- secretary to post a comment pinging the dev and asking for status
- secretary to post a comment requesting status from the developer
- secretary to ask reporter whether the first AVC is still a problem on 22 Beta or Final TC1
- secretary to post comment asking dev for status
- roshi to re-check #1210047 on current i386 images
Action items, by person
- roshi
- roshi to re-check #1210047 on current i386 images
- UNASSIGNED
- secretary to post a comment pinging the dev and asking for status
- secretary to post a comment requesting status from the developer
- secretary to ask reporter whether the first AVC is still a problem on 22 Beta or Final TC1
- secretary to post comment asking dev for status
People present (lines said)
- adamw (238)
- oddshocks (43)
- sgallagh (39)
- potty (20)
- danofsatx (16)
- potty_ (15)
- roshi (10)
- zodbot (4)
- dgilmore (4)
- satellit_e (4)
- mclasen (2)
- satellit (1)
Generated by MeetBot 0.1.4.