#fedora-meeting-2: F22 Beta Go/No-Go meeting
Meeting started by jreznik at 17:00:38 UTC
(full logs).
Meeting summary
- Roll Call (jreznik, 17:00:53)
- Purpose of this meeting (jreznik, 17:03:33)
- Purpose of this meeting is to see whether or
not F22 Beta is ready for shipment, according to the release
criteria. (jreznik,
17:03:35)
- This is determined in a few ways: (jreznik,
17:03:36)
- No remaining blocker bugs (jreznik,
17:03:38)
- Release candidate compose is available
(jreznik,
17:03:39)
- Test matrices for Beta are fully
completed (jreznik,
17:03:41)
- http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/milestone/22/beta/buglist
(jreznik,
17:03:42)
- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_22_Beta_RC1_Installation
(jreznik,
17:03:44)
- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_22_Beta_RC1_Base
(jreznik,
17:03:45)
- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_22_Beta_RC1_Desktop
(jreznik,
17:03:47)
- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_22_Beta_RC1_Server
(jreznik,
17:03:48)
- Current status (jreznik, 17:04:07)
- RC1 is available, we have 5 blocker bugs
proposed and QA coverage is not yet complete (jreznik,
17:05:57)
- Blocker Review (roshi, 17:06:43)
- (1210259) missing libicui18n.so.52 after fedup to F22, firefox won't start (roshi, 17:07:21)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210259
(roshi,
17:07:24)
- Proposed Blocker, firefox, NEW (roshi,
17:07:27)
- AGREED: - 1210259 -
RejectedBlocker Beta - This can be solved with updates, there's no
need to block Beta release for it. (roshi,
17:13:53)
- (1210042) F22 Beta RC1 progress bar does not update (roshi, 17:14:25)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210042
(roshi,
17:14:25)
- Proposed Blocker, gtk3, NEW (roshi,
17:14:25)
- AGREED: - 1210042 -
RejectedBlocker Beta - This bug is annoying, but doesn't actually
*stop* the install from proceeding and is thus not considered a
blocker for Beta. (roshi,
17:17:18)
- (1209602) Creating a database server role instance doesn't set the password for the owner (roshi, 17:17:25)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1209602
(roshi,
17:17:28)
- Proposed Blocker, rolekit, ON_QA (roshi,
17:17:31)
- AGREED: - 1209602 -
AcceptedBlocker Beta - This bug is a clear violation of the
following Final criterion: "The core functional requirements for all
Featured Server Roles must be met, without any workarounds being
necessary." (roshi,
17:20:17)
- (1209695) yum/dnf changes break composoing ostree trees (roshi, 17:20:28)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1209695
(roshi,
17:20:28)
- Proposed Blocker, rpm-ostree, ON_QA
(roshi,
17:20:28)
- http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/22_Beta_RC1/Cloud-Images/x86_64/Images/
(nirik,
17:22:45)
- (1209347) Unable to start Gnome X session on AMD based laptop (roshi, 17:33:39)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1209347
(roshi,
17:33:39)
- Proposed Blocker, xorg-x11-drv-ati, NEW
(roshi,
17:33:39)
- AGREED: - 1209347 -
RejectedBlocker AcceptedFreezeException Beta AcceptedBlocker Final -
This bug is a nasty one, but workarounds exist and the drivers can
be fixed post 'basic graphics' installation with an update for Beta.
If possible, a fix would be accepted for Beta. This will block for
final. (roshi,
17:44:30)
- (1210428) Cloud images won't successfully reboot (roshi, 17:44:50)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210428
(roshi,
17:44:50)
- Proposed Blocker, cloud-init, NEW (roshi,
17:44:50)
- AGREED: - 1210428 -
AcceptedBlocker Beta - This is a clear violation of the cited
criterion and the spirit of at least one more: "Shutting down,
logging out and rebooting must work using standard console commands
and the mechanisms offered (if any) by all release-blocking
desktops." (roshi,
18:06:15)
- ACTION: Cloud WG to
focus down on this one bug and testing for the next week
(roshi,
18:06:35)
- (1209695) yum/dnf changes break composoing ostree trees (roshi, 18:07:51)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1209695
(roshi,
18:07:52)
- Proposed Blocker, rpm-ostree, ON_QA
(roshi,
18:07:52)
- AGREED: - 1209695 -
RejectedBlocker AcceptedFreezeException Beta - This bug does not
afflict a release blocking edition for Fedora, but getting a fix in
for Beta would be great. (roshi,
18:11:41)
- Go/No-Go decision (jreznik, 18:15:18)
- AGREED: Fedora 22
Beta status is No-Go by Release Engineering, QA and
Development (jreznik,
18:17:12)
- ACTION: jreznik to
announce slip (jreznik,
18:19:04)
- open floor (jreznik, 18:19:23)
- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/TestResults/Fedora9Install/Beta
(adamw,
18:22:16)
Meeting ended at 18:25:12 UTC
(full logs).
Action items
- Cloud WG to focus down on this one bug and testing for the next week
- jreznik to announce slip
Action items, by person
- jreznik
- jreznik to announce slip
People present (lines said)
- roshi (138)
- jreznik (84)
- adamw (77)
- nirik (65)
- sgallagh (58)
- jzb (38)
- dgilmore (22)
- danofsatx (12)
- zodbot (10)
- juliuxpigface (10)
- kparal (9)
- oddshocks (6)
- pwhalen (4)
- satellit (2)
- pschindl (2)
- randomuser (1)
Generated by MeetBot 0.1.4.