17:00:07 #startmeeting F24 Alpha Go/No-Go meeting 17:00:07 Meeting started Wed Mar 23 17:00:07 2016 UTC. The chair is jkurik. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 17:00:07 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 17:00:07 The meeting name has been set to 'f24_alpha_go/no-go_meeting' 17:00:19 #meetingname F24-Alpha-Go_No_Go-meeting 17:00:19 The meeting name has been set to 'f24-alpha-go_no_go-meeting' 17:00:27 #topic Roll Call 17:00:32 .hellomynameis kevin 17:00:33 nirik: kevin 'Kevin Fenzi' 17:00:34 .hello jkurik 17:00:36 jkurik: jkurik 'Jan Kurik' 17:00:50 .hello mattdm 17:00:50 mattdm: mattdm 'Matthew Miller' 17:01:03 Hi everybody 17:01:04 .hello sgallagh 17:01:05 sgallagh: sgallagh 'Stephen Gallagher' 17:01:11 .hello pfrields 17:01:12 stickster: pfrields 'Paul W. Frields' 17:01:43 do we have adamw and dgilmore ? 17:01:47 ayup 17:01:50 .hello adamwill 17:01:53 adamw: adamwill 'Adam Williamson' 17:02:01 jkurik: I am in another meeting but kinda here 17:02:13 ok, so lets start 17:02:36 #topic Purpose of this meeting 17:02:38 #info Purpose of this meeting is to check whether or not F24 Alpha is ready for shipment, according to the release criteria. 17:02:39 #info This is determined in a few ways: 17:02:41 #info No remaining blocker bugs 17:02:42 #info Release candidate compose is available (check https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/6371 ) 17:02:44 #info Test matrices for Alpha are fully completed 17:02:45 #link https://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/milestone/24/alpha/buglist 17:02:47 #link https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_24_Alpha_1.7_Installation 17:02:49 #link https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_24_Alpha_1.7_Base 17:02:50 #link https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_24_Alpha_1.7_Desktop 17:02:51 #link https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_24_Alpha_1.7_Server 17:02:53 #link https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_24_Alpha_1.7_Cloud 17:02:55 #link https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_24_Alpha_1.7_Summary 17:02:56 #topic Current status 17:02:58 #info The last week we have decided to delay the Alpha release of F24 for a week due to several blockers 17:03:03 #link https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/teams/f24-alpha-go_no_go-meeting/f24-alpha-go_no_go-meeting.2016-03-17-17.00.log.html 17:03:12 #info Currently we have no remaining blockers, just one proposed blocker. 17:03:21 Let's start with Mini-blocker review 17:03:31 adamw: may I ask you please to chair the mini-blocker review (for the one bug) ? 17:03:36 sure 17:03:42 well 17:03:43 #chair dgilmore adamw sgallagh stickster 17:03:43 Current chairs: adamw dgilmore jkurik sgallagh stickster 17:03:44 it'll be very short 17:03:53 we don't really need to discuss it 17:04:28 #info #1315494 - as it has been all along, this bug is only on the blocker list for tracking; it is not in the candidate we will discuss today, Alpha-1.7. It was listed in case we pulled in a new anaconda build for any other reason and so needed to fix that bug. 17:04:29 heh 17:04:38 that's all we need, i think? 17:04:54 looks good :) 17:05:01 thanks Adam 17:05:17 #topic Test Matrices coverage 17:05:26 #link https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_24_Alpha_1.7_Summary 17:06:50 so, we do not have all the test cases for Alpha covered yet, however from my POV the most imposrtant are covered and I am fine to consider this as sufficient 17:06:51 so i think we can consider most Alpha-1.6 results valid for Alpha-1.7 also 17:07:06 i have not done the thing where we list the Alpha-1.6 results in the Alpha-1.7 pages yet, sorry :/ 17:07:15 i can do that as the meeting rolls along, for reference 17:07:30 adamw: thanks 17:07:32 the changes between Alpha-1.6 and Alpha-1.7 mostly affected desktops - there were changes to the Workstation and KDE package sets 17:08:09 so, are there any objections to consider the Test Matrices as sufficiently covered for the F24 alpha ? 17:08:13 so we did re-cover the Desktop tests 17:08:23 just let me do a quick blow through and check nothing worrying is missing... 17:09:08 adamw: ok, lets wait a while for your blow through and check 17:09:35 so in fact all that's missing for Alpha-1.7 is a few Server tests - otherwise all Alpha tests are actually covered 17:09:40 while we're waiting... special public thank you for sgallagh and rdieter_work for help with a couple of the blockers that came up over the intervening week 17:09:41 so we're pretty good. +1 coverage 17:09:45 oops, no longer waiting :-) 17:09:56 i'll transfer the few missing Server results from 1.6. 17:09:59 cool 17:10:08 adamw: thanks 17:10:11 \o/ 17:10:16 adamw: Right, I ran the full set on 1.6, but only spot-checked the more complicated pieces in 1.7 17:10:23 that's fine, nothing there should have changed. 17:10:26 Yeah 17:10:54 #info a special thank you for sgallagh and rdieter for help with a couple of the blockers 17:12:04 #info Test Matrices for F24 Alpha are considered as covered 17:12:20 adamw++ 17:12:20 jkurik: Karma for adamwill changed to 16 (for the f23 release cycle): https://badges.fedoraproject.org/tags/cookie/any 17:12:42 I believe we can move on now for the final decision ... 17:12:50 #topic Go/No-Go decision 17:13:31 as we have no blockers and Test Matrices are considered as covered we might start with voting 17:14:07 I don't see any issues blocking things. +1 go from me. 17:14:13 i'm sad we didn't get a fix for the initial-setup issue, but i'm all good to go for Alpha personally 17:14:25 by QA policy, QA votes 'go' as test coverage is sufficient and there are no outstanding blockers 17:14:42 proposed #agreed Fedora 24 alpha release is considered as GOLD and we are ready to ship it 17:14:45 I am also +1 to Go 17:15:06 jkurik: well, gold-plated at least :) 17:15:12 +1 to go. 17:15:19 gold-effect! 17:15:50 jeez, i am actually flat out amazed we're only out by a week, with an entirely retooled compose process...nice job everyone 17:15:54 The Gold Experience 17:16:04 adamw: don't jinx it 17:16:05 so we have QE as +1, FESCo as +2, Eng.Management as +1 17:16:08 yeah, impressive 17:16:19 we need Release Engineering to vote 17:16:22 yeah, most definitely 17:16:26 dgilmore++ 17:16:27 sgallagh: Karma for ausil changed to 25 (for the f23 release cycle): https://badges.fedoraproject.org/tags/cookie/any 17:16:33 dgilmore: may I ask you please to express your opinion ? 17:16:33 we are go 17:16:39 woop woop 17:17:04 dgilmore: thanks 17:17:19 #agreed Fedora 24 Alpha release is considered as GOLD and we are ready to ship it 17:17:39 thanks everybody for the work on the release 17:17:42 #topic Open floor 17:17:49 anything else to discuss today on this meeting ? 17:18:16 #action jkurik to publish the Go/No-Go result 17:18:23 thanks everyone! 17:18:25 nada, zip, zilch 17:19:12 looks like there is nothing more for this meeting today 17:19:26 so thanks everybody for joing today 17:19:35 we're missing atomic and some lives for Alpha 17:19:41 i guess we can talk about that at readiness? 17:19:42 I will end this meeting in a few seconds ... 17:19:49 is there another readiness? 17:19:57 adamw: no more readiness 17:20:07 Atomic is not a blocking deliverable 17:20:50 as I understan from Amanda, the Atomic team is going to synchronize the release of the 2-weeks Atomic with the Alpha 17:22:04 anything else ? 17:22:20 Well done, folks! 17:22:47 Thanks everybody 17:22:50 #endmeeting