========================================== #fedora-blocker-review: F24-blocker-review ========================================== Meeting started by adamw at 16:05:11 UTC. The full logs are available at https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2016-04-04/f24-blocker-review.2016-04-04-16.05.log.html . Meeting summary --------------- * Roll Call (adamw, 16:05:12) * Introduction (adamw, 16:12:02) * Our purpose in this meeting is to review proposed blocker and nice-to-have bugs and decide whether to accept them, and to monitor the progress of fixing existing accepted blocker and nice-to-have bugs. (adamw, 16:12:02) * We'll be following the process outlined at: (adamw, 16:12:02) * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting (adamw, 16:12:04) * The bugs up for review today are available at: (adamw, 16:12:04) * LINK: http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/current (adamw, 16:12:06) * The criteria for release blocking bugs can be found at: (adamw, 16:12:09) * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_24_Alpha_Release_Criteria (adamw, 16:12:11) * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_24_Beta_Release_Criteria (adamw, 16:12:13) * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_24_Final_Release_Criteria (adamw, 16:12:16) * pschindl to secretarialize (adamw, 16:15:11) * (1318067) [anaconda] non-bootable system after fresh install of current F24 on bare metal (adamw, 16:16:13) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1318067 (adamw, 16:16:13) * Proposed Blocker, grub2, NEW (adamw, 16:16:13) * AGREED: 1318067 - AcceptedBlocker (Beta) - this is a conditional violation of "A system installed without a graphical package set must boot to a state where it is possible to log in through at least one of the default virtual consoles." and from the info gathered it seems significant enough of a violation to accept as a blocker (adamw, 16:27:22) * (1323511) hibernate action results in a shutdown (adamw, 16:27:28) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323511 (adamw, 16:27:28) * Proposed Blocker, kernel, NEW (adamw, 16:27:28) * AGREED: 1323511 - RejectedBlocker (Beta) - the criteria do not cover hibernation and this is intentional, it's not considered release-blocking functionality (due to the difficulty of making it work reliably). it's also not really supported in VMs anyhow. (adamw, 16:37:11) * (1293167) [abrt] kf5-kinit: qt_message_fatal(): kdeinit5 killed by SIGABRT (adamw, 16:37:19) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1293167 (adamw, 16:37:19) * Proposed Blocker, kf5-kinit, NEW (adamw, 16:37:20) * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_24_Beta_Release_Criteria#Desktop_panel (kparal, 16:40:02) * AGREED: 1293167 - AcceptedBlocker (Final) AcceptedFreezeException (Beta) - we count this as a conditional violation of "...logging out...must work using...the mechanisms offered (if any) by all release-blocking desktops." As it's conditional and affects a more advanced use case we accept it as a Final blocker rather than Beta, but also as a Beta freeze exception issue. (adamw, 16:47:55) * (1321393) blivet.errors.DeviceTreeError: no slaves found for device md127 (adamw, 16:48:18) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1321393 (adamw, 16:48:18) * Proposed Blocker, python-blivet, NEW (adamw, 16:48:18) * AGREED: 1321393 - punt (delay decision) - this looks worrying, but we need more information: from the reporters on whether they had an actual valid RAID set or just disks with stale RAID metadata, and from blivet and/or mdadm developers on what the problem looks like from their end (adamw, 17:00:25) * we have no proposed Final blockers at this point (adamw, 17:00:40) * moving onto accepted Beta blockers (adamw, 17:01:22) * (1259865) call `dnf mark install `on packages installed from PK (adamw, 17:01:53) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1259865 (adamw, 17:01:53) * Accepted Blocker, PackageKit, NEW (adamw, 17:01:53) * this was accepted back in February and no progress seems to have been made (adamw, 17:02:28) * ACTION: kparal to poke GNOME Software / PK folks and try to get some movement on this bug (adamw, 17:04:58) * (1306808) blivet.errors.FSError: mount failed: 32 (adamw, 17:05:47) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1306808 (adamw, 17:05:48) * Accepted Blocker, anaconda, NEW (adamw, 17:05:48) * ACTION: adamw to very diplomatically raise this bug with anaconda team (adamw, 17:06:23) * (1262556) AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'get_data' (adamw, 17:08:29) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1262556 (adamw, 17:08:29) * Accepted Blocker, NetworkManager, NEW (adamw, 17:08:29) * this one has a needinfo from a dev, so we should get on that (adamw, 17:08:36) * Open floor (adamw, 17:10:13) Meeting ended at 17:13:32 UTC. Action Items ------------ * kparal to poke GNOME Software / PK folks and try to get some movement on this bug * adamw to very diplomatically raise this bug with anaconda team Action Items, by person ----------------------- * adamw * adamw to very diplomatically raise this bug with anaconda team * kparal * kparal to poke GNOME Software / PK folks and try to get some movement on this bug * **UNASSIGNED** * (none) People Present (lines said) --------------------------- * adamw (134) * kparal (46) * handsome_pirate (34) * Southern_Gentlem (17) * jpigface (12) * pschindl (11) * pwhalen (10) * dgilmore (8) * zodbot (7) * satellit_e (1) Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4 .. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot