========================================== #fedora-blocker-review: F25-blocker-review ========================================== Meeting started by pschindl at 16:00:14 UTC. The full logs are available at https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2016-07-20/f25-blocker-review.2016-07-20-16.00.log.html . Meeting summary --------------- * Roll Call (pschindl, 16:00:18) * Introduction (pschindl, 16:12:19) * Our purpose in this meeting is to review proposed blocker and nice-to-have bugs and decide whether to accept them, and to monitor the progress of fixing existing accepted blocker and nice-to-have bugs. (pschindl, 16:12:23) * We'll be following the process outlined at: (pschindl, 16:12:25) * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting (pschindl, 16:12:30) * The bugs up for review today are available at: (pschindl, 16:12:32) * LINK: http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/current (pschindl, 16:12:34) * The criteria for release blocking bugs can be found at: (pschindl, 16:12:36) * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_25_Alpha_Release_Criteria (pschindl, 16:12:38) * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_25_Beta_Release_Criteria (pschindl, 16:12:40) * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_25_Final_Release_Criteria (pschindl, 16:12:42) * 5 Proposed Blockers (pschindl, 16:12:49) * 0 Accepted Blockers (pschindl, 16:12:51) * 0 Proposed Freeze Exceptions (pschindl, 16:12:53) * 0 Accepted Freeze Exceptions (pschindl, 16:12:55) * coremodule will do all the secretary stuff (pschindl, 16:15:59) * (1342732) SELinux is preventing accounts-daemon from 'write' accesses on the directory root. (pschindl, 16:16:49) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1342732 (pschindl, 16:16:51) * Proposed Blocker, accountsservice, ASSIGNED (pschindl, 16:16:53) * LINK: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/25538 (kparal, 16:20:30) * AGREED: 1342732 - Remove the blocker nomination - original bug seems to be already fixed. There is no need to block on this now. If the problem appears again, please repropose. (pschindl, 16:26:18) * (1352680) efibootmgr calls in anaconda crashing since efivar-0.24-1.fc25 landed (pschindl, 16:26:20) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1352680 (pschindl, 16:26:20) * Proposed Blocker, efibootmgr, NEW (pschindl, 16:26:21) * LINK: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/25721#step/_do_install_and_reboot/33 (kparal, 16:28:20) * AGREED: 1352680 - AcceptedBlocker - Failing efibootmgr clearly violates the alpha criterion: "When using a dedicated installer image, the installer must be able to complete an installation using the text, graphical and VNC installation interfaces." (pschindl, 16:34:23) * (1353054) FreeIPA server deployment fails due to pki-core dangling symlinks (one from non-installed 'scannotation' package, one formerly in resteasy-jaxrs-api but now lost) (pschindl, 16:34:37) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1353054 (pschindl, 16:34:39) * Proposed Blocker, pki-core, NEW (pschindl, 16:34:41) * AGREED: 1353054 - AcceptedBlocker - This bug violates the criterion: "Release-blocking roles and the supported role configuration interfaces must meet the core functional Role Definition Requirements to the extent that supported roles can be successfully deployed, started, stopped, brought to a working configuration, and queried." The domain controller role can't be deployed because of this bug. (pschindl, 16:39:16) * (1358416) "Error setting up software source" when attempting a Network installation (pschindl, 16:39:40) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1358416 (pschindl, 16:39:42) * Proposed Blocker, anaconda, NEW (pschindl, 16:39:44) * AGREED: 1358416 - AcceptedBlocker - Malfunctioning networking violates the alpha criterion: "When using a release-blocking dedicated installer image, the installer must be able to use either HTTP or FTP repositories (or both) as package sources. Release-blocking network install images must default to a valid publicly-accessible package source." (pschindl, 16:45:23) * (1349721) Upgrade from Fedora 24 to Fedora Rawhide with dnf-plugin-system-upgrade fails, system stuck in boot loop until booted with enforcing=0 (pschindl, 16:45:56) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1349721 (pschindl, 16:45:58) * Proposed Blocker, selinux-policy, NEW (pschindl, 16:46:00) * AGREED: 1349721 - AcceptedBlocker - Failing upgrade violates the beta criterion: "For each one of the release-blocking package sets, it must be possible to successfully complete a direct upgrade from fully updated installations of the last two stable Fedora releases with that package set installed." (pschindl, 16:50:12) * (1347415) iSCSI install fails in current Rawhide with "The name org.storaged.Storaged was not provided by any .service files" (pschindl, 16:50:39) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1347415 (pschindl, 16:50:41) * Proposed Blocker, lorax, POST (pschindl, 16:50:43) * AGREED: 1347415 - AcceptedBlocker - This bug violates the final criterion: "The installer must be able to detect (if possible) and install to supported network-attached storage devices." (pschindl, 16:54:17) * Open floor (pschindl, 16:54:28) Meeting ended at 16:57:47 UTC. Action Items ------------ Action Items, by person ----------------------- * **UNASSIGNED** * (none) People Present (lines said) --------------------------- * pschindl (73) * kparal (44) * pwhalen (25) * RaphGro (19) * coremodule (18) * zodbot (7) * Southern_Gentlem (1) Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4 .. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot