#fedora-blocker-review: F27-blocker-review
Meeting started by adamw at 16:02:41 UTC
(full logs).
Meeting summary
- Roll Call (adamw, 16:02:41)
- Introduction (adamw, 16:06:19)
- Our purpose in this meeting is to review
proposed blocker and nice-to-have bugs and decide whether to accept
them, and to monitor the progress of fixing existing accepted
blocker and nice-to-have bugs. (adamw,
16:06:20)
- We'll be following the process outlined
at: (adamw,
16:06:20)
- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting
(adamw,
16:06:21)
- The bugs up for review today are available
at: (adamw,
16:06:21)
- http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/current
(adamw,
16:06:23)
- The criteria for release blocking bugs can be
found at: (adamw,
16:06:27)
- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_27_Alpha_Release_Criteria
(adamw,
16:06:29)
- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_27_Beta_Release_Criteria
(adamw,
16:06:31)
- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_27_Final_Release_Criteria
(adamw,
16:06:33)
- 8 Proposed Beta Blockers (adamw,
16:07:04)
- 5 Accepted Beta Blockers (adamw,
16:07:04)
- 3 Proposed Final Blockers (adamw,
16:07:18)
- 5 Accepted Final Blockers (adamw,
16:07:19)
- kparal will secretariarariariariariari(INFINITE
LOOP DETECTED)alize (adamw,
16:09:01)
- (1485831) shim package is not available, installation fails (adamw, 16:10:53)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1485831
(adamw,
16:10:53)
- Proposed Blocker, anaconda, ON_QA (adamw,
16:10:53)
- already fixed in recent composes (adamw,
16:11:01)
- (1487856) UEFI installs fail to boot with anaconda-27.20-1 (due to EFI executable name mismatch) (adamw, 16:12:02)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1487856
(adamw,
16:12:02)
- Proposed Blocker, anaconda, MODIFIED
(adamw,
16:12:02)
- AGREED: 1487856 -
AcceptedBlocker (Beta) - violates Alpha "Expected installed system
boot behavior" requirements for some, possibly all, UEFI
installs (adamw,
16:16:24)
- (1477916) Workstation boot.iso is 1.8 GB, seems to be ostree iso (adamw, 16:16:34)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1477916
(adamw,
16:16:34)
- Proposed Blocker, distribution, NEW
(adamw,
16:16:34)
- AGREED: 1477916 -
punt (delay decision) - we did not yet get around to testing this in
more detail or drafting a revised criterion, so we will punt (delay)
this one again and try to get it done this week (adamw,
16:31:58)
- (1455561) ipa-server-install fails to obtain RA certificate from CA (CA_UNREACHABLE) (adamw, 16:32:38)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1455561
(adamw,
16:32:38)
- Proposed Blocker, freeipa, POST (adamw,
16:32:39)
- AGREED: 1455561 -
AcceptedBlocker (Beta) - clear violation of "Release-blocking roles
and the supported role configuration interfaces must meet the core
functional Role Definition Requirements to the extent that supported
roles can be successfully deployed..." for the release-blocking
'domain controller' role (adamw,
16:39:20)
- (1487305) Raspberry Pi 3: run-initial-setup hangs (adamw, 16:40:44)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1487305
(adamw,
16:40:44)
- Proposed Blocker, initial-setup, NEW
(adamw,
16:40:44)
- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/ARM/Supported_Platforms
(adamw,
16:43:21)
- AGREED: 1487305 -
AcceptedBlocker (Beta) - this sounds like a violation of Alpha
criterion "A working mechanism to create a user account must be
clearly presented during installation and/or first boot of the
installed system" for Raspberry Pi 3, which is a supported ARM
platform for F27. If further testing indicates it's not so
clear-cut, we will revisit (adamw,
16:53:16)
- (1484155) rdma-core excluding armhfp breaks many, many dep chains (adamw, 16:53:27)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1484155
(adamw,
16:53:28)
- Proposed Blocker, rdma-core, NEW (adamw,
16:53:28)
- this is pretty much solved now, at least to the
point where it isn't blocking composes or obviously breaking
critical functionality any more (adamw,
16:54:13)
- we will un-propose or close the bug
(adamw,
16:54:21)
- (1484566) Multiple 'map' denials prevent Cockpit from working (adamw, 16:55:32)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1484566
(adamw,
16:55:33)
- Proposed Blocker, selinux-policy-targeted,
MODIFIED (adamw,
16:55:33)
- AGREED: 1484566 -
AcceptedBlocker (Beta) - clear violation of Alpha criterion "Unless
explicitly specified otherwise, after system installation the
Cockpit web management interface must be running and accessible on
its default port (9090)" (adamw,
17:00:57)
- (1484569) 'map' denials prevent PostgreSQL starting (adamw, 17:01:06)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1484569
(adamw,
17:01:06)
- Proposed Blocker, selinux-policy-targeted,
MODIFIED (adamw,
17:01:06)
- per openQA tests of Fedora-27-20170903.n.0 ,
this is now fixed (adamw,
17:02:47)
- bug will be closed (adamw,
17:03:24)
- moving on to proposed Final blockers...
(adamw,
17:05:45)
- (1486002) grub2-mkconfig does not work if xen.gz is installed. (adamw, 17:05:49)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1486002
(adamw,
17:05:49)
- Proposed Blocker, grub2, NEW (adamw,
17:05:49)
- AGREED: 1486002 -
AcceptedBlocker (Beta) - we're happy to accept Konrad's assertion
that this violates the Final criterion "The release must boot
successfully as Xen DomU with releases providing a functional,
supported Xen Dom0 and widely used cloud providers utilizing
Xen" (adamw,
17:15:58)
- (1484575) Filesystem resizing during install fails since 2.1.10 (likely due to removal of unconditional filesystem check) (adamw, 17:16:08)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1484575
(adamw,
17:16:08)
- Proposed Blocker, python-blivet, POST
(adamw,
17:16:08)
- AGREED: 1486002 -
AcceptedBlocker (Final) - clear violation of Final criterion "Any
installer mechanism for resizing storage volumes must correctly
attempt the requested operation" (adamw,
17:24:26)
- (1484908) xenconsole does want to start (adamw, 17:24:39)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1484908
(adamw,
17:24:39)
- Proposed Blocker, xen, NEW (adamw,
17:24:39)
- AGREED: 1484908 -
punt (delay decision) - it's not clear whether this actually
violates the criterion, so we will request a more detailed
explanation from Konrad (adamw,
17:34:30)
- Open floor (adamw, 17:35:32)
- #1486002 was incorrectly agreed as
AcceptedBlocker (Beta), it was in fact AcceptedBlocker
(Final) (adamw,
17:35:37)
Meeting ended at 17:43:32 UTC
(full logs).
Action items
- (none)
People present (lines said)
- adamw (190)
- kparal (56)
- pschindl_wfh (17)
- dominicpg (15)
- Southern_Gentlem (14)
- zodbot (11)
- mkolman (9)
- sgallagh (5)
Generated by MeetBot 0.1.4.