#fedora-meeting: F27 Releng Retrospective

Meeting started by syeghiay at 18:02:04 UTC (full logs).

Meeting summary

    1. https://public.etherpad-mozilla.org/p/FedoraRelease27RelEngRetrospective (dgilmore, 18:02:43)
    2. https://meet.jit.si/fedora27retro (mattdm, 18:03:01)
    3. https://www.youtube.com/c/MatthewMiller-mattdm/live (mattdm, 18:04:43)
    4. live stream (slightly delayed) (mattdm, 18:04:56)
    5. ACTION: Schedule Slipping: investigate how to cope with such a short release cycle and if we still think skipping alpha is still worth the benefits (syeghiay, 18:42:02)
    6. ACTION: Process Needed: investigate how we can ensure rel-eng is keep in loop regarding important items (syeghiay, 18:48:26)
    7. ACTION: Packager Tooling not feature complete: investigate how we can repair this moving forward (syeghiay, 18:51:52)
    8. ACTION: Multiarch Support in container registry: investigate how we can better communicate/collaborate on the multi arch efforts - central point for this type of communication? (syeghiay, 18:58:40)
    9. ACTION: Multiarch Support in container registry: create issue for this problem (syeghiay, 18:59:07)
    10. ACTION: Addition of s390 architecture: investigate process for change management (syeghiay, 19:00:41)
    11. ACTION: Addition of s390 architecture: investigate process for portfolio (multi-project) management (syeghiay, 19:00:57)
    12. ACTION: Lack of project management: investigate establishing more project management processes (syeghiay, 19:01:24)


Meeting ended at 19:02:57 UTC (full logs).

Action items

  1. Schedule Slipping: investigate how to cope with such a short release cycle and if we still think skipping alpha is still worth the benefits
  2. Process Needed: investigate how we can ensure rel-eng is keep in loop regarding important items
  3. Packager Tooling not feature complete: investigate how we can repair this moving forward
  4. Multiarch Support in container registry: investigate how we can better communicate/collaborate on the multi arch efforts - central point for this type of communication?
  5. Multiarch Support in container registry: create issue for this problem
  6. Addition of s390 architecture: investigate process for change management
  7. Addition of s390 architecture: investigate process for portfolio (multi-project) management
  8. Lack of project management: investigate establishing more project management processes


People present (lines said)

  1. bowlofeggs (21)
  2. dustymabe (15)
  3. zodbot (13)
  4. puiterwijk (13)
  5. syeghiay (12)
  6. dgilmore (12)
  7. threebean (4)
  8. mattdm (4)
  9. jwf (4)
  10. mboddu (3)
  11. tflink (1)
  12. sgallagh (1)


Generated by MeetBot 0.1.4.