#fedora-blocker-review: F28-blocker-review

Meeting summary

1. Roll Call (adamw, 17:01:36)
   
2. Introduction (adamw, 17:08:05)
   1. Our purpose in this meeting is to review proposed blocker and nice-to-have bugs and decide whether to accept them, and to monitor the progress of fixing existing accepted blocker and nice-to-have bugs. (adamw, 17:08:05)
   2. We'll be following the process outlined at: (adamw, 17:08:05)
   3. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting (adamw, 17:08:06)
   4. The bugs up for review today are available at: (adamw, 17:08:07)
   5. http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/current (adamw, 17:08:11)
   6. The criteria for release blocking bugs can be found at: (adamw, 17:08:13)
   7. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Basic_Release_Criteria (adamw, 17:08:15)
   8. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_28_Beta_Release_Criteria (adamw, 17:08:17)
   9. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_28_Final_Release_Criteria (adamw, 17:08:19)
   10. 2 Proposed Blockers (Beta) (adamw, 17:08:26)
   11. 1 Accepted Blockers (Beta) (adamw, 17:08:32)
   12. 1 Proposed Freeze Exceptions (Beta) (adamw, 17:08:36)
   13. 1 Proposed Blockers (Final) (adamw, 17:08:46)
   14. coremodule will secretarialize (adamw, 17:13:31)
   
   
3. (1496562) freeipa tests in Fedora28+ shouldn't test for specific NSS database filenames, but should be flexible (adamw, 17:13:48)
   1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1496562 (adamw, 17:13:48)
   2. Proposed Blocker, pki-core, ASSIGNED (adamw, 17:13:48)
   3. AGREED: 1496562 - AcceptedBlocker (Beta) - this bug is a clear violation of "Release-blocking roles and the supported role configuration interfaces must meet the core functional Role Definition Requirements to the extent that supported roles can be successfully deployed, started, stopped, brought to a working configuration, and queried" (adamw, 17:19:17)
   
   
4. (1520580) Unable to log in on arm disk images (adamw, 17:19:25)
   1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1520580 (adamw, 17:19:26)
   2. Proposed Blocker, selinux-policy, NEW (adamw, 17:19:26)
   3. AGREED: 1520580 - AcceptedBlocker (Beta) - clear violation of "A system installed without a graphical package set must boot to a state where it is possible to log in through at least one of the default virtual consoles" for ARM disk images (adamw, 17:24:31)
   4. moving onto the proposed Final blocker (adamw, 17:24:54)
   
   
5. (1518032) dnfdragora notifies of available updates in Plasma live session (adamw, 17:25:04)
   1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1518032 (adamw, 17:25:04)
   2. Proposed Blocker, spin-kickstarts, ASSIGNED (adamw, 17:25:04)
   3. AGREED: 1518032 - AcceptedBlocker (Final) - clear violation of "Release-blocking desktops must notify the user of available updates, but must not do so when running as a live image" (adamw, 17:29:47)
   4. moving onto the Beta proposed FE (adamw, 17:30:03)
   
   
6. (1519042) sugar desktop starts in journal. (adamw, 17:30:04)
   1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1519042 (adamw, 17:30:04)
   2. Proposed Freeze Exceptions, sugar-journal, NEW (adamw, 17:30:04)
   3. AGREED: 1519042 - AcceptedFreezeException (Beta) - this is a clear wrong behaviour in a non-blocking live image that can't be fixed with an update, and the fix is highly likely to be localized to Sugar (adamw, 17:32:54)
   
   
7. Open floor (adamw, 17:32:57)

Action items

1. (none)

People present (lines said)

1. adamw (64)
2. coremodule (13)
3. pwhalen (11)
4. sgallagh (11)
5. zodbot (5)
6. sumantrom[m] (4)