#fedora-meeting-1: F28 Final Go/No-Go meeting
Meeting started by jkurik at 17:02:24 UTC
(full logs).
Meeting summary
- Roll Call (jkurik, 17:02:39)
- Purpose of this meeting (jkurik, 17:03:07)
- Purpose of this meeting is to check whether or
not F28 Final is ready for shipment, according to the release
criteria. (jkurik,
17:03:14)
- This is determined in a few ways: (jkurik,
17:03:19)
- * No remaining blocker bugs (jkurik,
17:03:25)
- * Release candidate compose is available
(jkurik,
17:03:30)
- * Test matrices for Final are fully
completed (jkurik,
17:03:36)
- Current status (jkurik, 17:03:53)
- The RC for F28 Final is ready (jkurik,
17:05:15)
- http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/28_RC-1.1/
(jkurik,
17:05:21)
- Test matrices are available (jkurik,
17:05:26)
- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_28_RC_1.1_Summary
(jkurik,
17:05:32)
- There are proposed and accepted blockers we
need to go through (jkurik,
17:05:39)
- https://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/milestone/28/final/buglist
(jkurik,
17:05:46)
- Mini-Blocker Review (jkurik, 17:06:15)
- https://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/milestone/28/final/buglist
(jkurik,
17:06:25)
- there's one proposed blocker (adamw,
17:06:58)
- (1569211) GDM fails first login attempt after reboot (adamw, 17:06:59)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1569211
(adamw,
17:06:59)
- Proposed Blocker, gnome-shell, NEW (adamw,
17:06:59)
- AGREED: 1569211 -
RejectedBlocker (Final) - there's a general feeling that this is bad
but not *so* bad that it constitutes a serious enough criteria
violation to abort the release at this point. most users who run
into this will just assume they mistyped, and type again; it's not
likely to lock anyone out of anything. We certainly hope that a fix
for this can be made available as a 0-day blocker (adamw,
17:21:34)
- we have one outstanding accepted blocker
(adamw,
17:24:05)
- (1537253) Add-On Modularity (adamw, 17:25:31)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1537253
(adamw,
17:25:31)
- Accepted Blocker, Changes Tracking,
VERIFIED (adamw,
17:25:31)
- once again for the record, FESCo has declared
the Add-on Modularity feature as 'blocking' F28 release, this bug is
being used to track whether the feature meets FESCo's stated
requirements (adamw,
17:26:15)
- multiple testers report that Modularity does
meet FESCo's requirements, so this blocker is considered
addressed. (adamw,
17:29:37)
- Test Matrices coverage (jkurik, 17:31:13)
- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_28_RC_1.1_Summary
(jkurik,
17:31:15)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1557655#c28
tends to indicate it actually worked at 2018-04-10, though i
should've asked lili to be a bit more explicit. (adamw,
17:34:20)
- http://www.islinuxaboutchoice.com/
(stickster,
17:52:27)
- AGREED: Test matrices
coverage is considered as sufficient for the F28 Final
release. (jkurik,
18:00:05)
- Go/No-Go decision (jkurik, 18:00:21)
- AGREED: The
Fedora_28_RC_1.1 is considered as GOLD and we are going to ship it
on May 1st, 2018 (jkurik,
18:04:28)
- ACTION: jkurik to
publish the Go/No-Go result (jkurik,
18:04:38)
- Open floor (jkurik, 18:04:48)
Meeting ended at 18:08:01 UTC
(full logs).
Action items
- jkurik to publish the Go/No-Go result
Action items, by person
- jkurik
- jkurik to publish the Go/No-Go result
People present (lines said)
- adamw (87)
- puiterwijk (71)
- jkurik (58)
- sgallagh (47)
- langdon (43)
- stickster (30)
- nirik (26)
- lruzicka (22)
- zodbot (21)
- mboddu (17)
- mattdm (16)
- bowlofeggs (15)
- jsmith (11)
- stickster_temp (10)
- sumantro (8)
- kparal (7)
- mclasen (5)
- satellit_ (5)
- x3mboy (4)
- Southern_Gentlem (4)
- nb (3)
- zbyszek (3)
- frantisekz (3)
- bt0 (1)
- decathorpe (1)
- smooge (1)
Generated by MeetBot 0.1.4.