#fedora-blocker-review: F29-blocker-review
Meeting started by adamw at 16:01:42 UTC
(full logs).
Meeting summary
- Roll Call (adamw, 16:01:42)
- Introduction (adamw, 16:13:12)
- Our purpose in this meeting is to review
proposed blocker and nice-to-have bugs and decide whether to accept
them, and to monitor the progress of fixing existing accepted
blocker and nice-to-have bugs. (adamw,
16:13:12)
- We'll be following the process outlined
at: (adamw,
16:13:12)
- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting
(adamw,
16:13:14)
- The bugs up for review today are available
at: (adamw,
16:13:14)
- http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/current
(adamw,
16:13:17)
- The criteria for release blocking bugs can be
found at: (adamw,
16:13:18)
- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Basic_Release_Criteria
(adamw,
16:13:22)
- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_29_Beta_Release_Criteria
(adamw,
16:13:24)
- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_29_Final_Release_Criteria
(adamw,
16:13:26)
- frantisekz will secretarialize (adamw,
16:16:23)
- 7 Proposed Blockers (adamw,
16:17:38)
- 1 Accepted Blockers (adamw,
16:17:42)
- 1 Proposed Freeze Exceptions (adamw,
16:17:45)
- starting with proposed Beta blockers
(adamw,
16:18:02)
- (1576699) unable to do vnc installation (adamw, 16:18:03)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1576699
(adamw,
16:18:03)
- Proposed Blocker, anaconda, NEW (adamw,
16:18:03)
- AGREED: 1576699 -
AcceptedBlocker (Beta) - clear violation of "When using a dedicated
installer image, the installer must be able to complete an
installation using the text, graphical and VNC installation
interfaces" (adamw,
16:22:22)
- (1577405) '<CompositeObject>' object has no attribute 'FirewallEnabled' (adamw, 16:22:34)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1577405
(adamw,
16:22:34)
- Proposed Blocker, anaconda, NEW (adamw,
16:22:34)
- https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/236941
uses a kickstart with no firewall line (adamw,
16:30:23)
- AGREED: 1577405 -
RejectedBlocker (Beta) - as currently understood, this does not
affect any release-blocking image. If our understanding of the bug
changes we will revisit this (adamw,
16:32:38)
- (1573873) Cogl/Clutter does not support 10-bit depth colours making some Gnome applications unusable (adamw, 16:32:50)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1573873
(adamw,
16:32:50)
- Proposed Blocker, cogl, NEW (adamw,
16:32:51)
- AGREED: 1573873 -
RejectedBlocker (Beta) - as things stand, nothing is broken for F29
Beta. There is no blocker bug here. If the 10-bit support is
reintroduced in Mesa without affected applications being fixed, we
will revisit this. (adamw,
16:50:28)
- (1575650) initial-setup fails - ImportError: cannot import name 'USER' (adamw, 16:52:01)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1575650
(adamw,
16:52:01)
- Proposed Blocker, initial-setup,
MODIFIED (adamw,
16:52:01)
- https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/236905
looks like this is fixed. (adamw,
16:52:37)
- openQA testing indicates this is now fixed with
initial-setup-0.3.61-1 , we will close the bug (adamw,
16:53:34)
- (1575626) libdnf does not handle module stream updates properly (adamw, 16:53:49)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1575626
(adamw,
16:53:49)
- Proposed Blocker, libdnf, NEW (adamw,
16:53:49)
- AGREED: 1575626 -
AcceptedBlocker (Beta) - clearly violates the newly revised
criterion "The installed system must be able to download and install
appropriate updates with the default tool for the relevant update
type in all release-blocking desktops (e.g. default graphical
package manager)" (adamw,
16:58:06)
- (1574711) pki-tools cannot be installed on current Rawhide (due to tomcat version bump) (adamw, 16:58:16)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1574711
(adamw,
16:58:16)
- Proposed Blocker, pki-core, MODIFIED
(adamw,
16:58:16)
- openQA FreeIPA tests on current Rawhide pass,
indicating this is now resolved, we will close the bug (adamw,
17:01:02)
- (1575797) Bootloader installation fails (BIOS) or installed system boot fails (UEFI) when blivet-gui partitioning used during install (adamw, 17:01:59)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1575797
(adamw,
17:01:59)
- Proposed Blocker, xfsprogs, NEW (adamw,
17:01:59)
- AGREED: 1575797 -
AcceptedBlocker (Beta) - accepted as a violation of the custom
partitioning criteria, which clearly imply that a system installed
with custom partitioning must actually boot (adamw,
17:09:44)
- going to the one proposed FE (adamw,
17:10:24)
- (1577405) '<CompositeObject>' object has no attribute 'FirewallEnabled' (adamw, 17:10:26)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1577405
(adamw,
17:10:26)
- Proposed Freeze Exceptions, anaconda,
NEW (adamw,
17:10:26)
- this is in fact an automatic freeze exception
per
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_freeze_exception_bug_process#Automatic_freeze_exceptions
(adamw,
17:11:40)
- we will mark as Accepted. (adamw,
17:12:04)
- taking a quick look at the accepted
blocker (adamw,
17:12:13)
- (1572916) kernel after 4.17.0-0.rc2.git0.1.fc29 waits for random entropy on boot (adamw, 17:12:19)
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1572916
(adamw,
17:12:19)
- Accepted Blocker, kernel, NEW (adamw,
17:12:19)
- the dimensions of this problem are becoming
more well-understood over time, but we still don't know exactly what
further (if anything) the kernel team plans to do about it at this
point (adamw,
17:21:03)
- ACTION: adamw to ask
kernel team about their plans for this (adamw,
17:21:11)
- Open floo (adamw, 17:21:28)
- Open floor (adamw, 17:21:30)
Meeting ended at 17:26:14 UTC
(full logs).
Action items
- adamw to ask kernel team about their plans for this
Action items, by person
- adamw
- adamw to ask kernel team about their plans for this
People present (lines said)
- adamw (152)
- sgallagh (38)
- kparal (35)
- puiterwijk (33)
- frantisekz (17)
- pwhalen (12)
- zodbot (10)
- coremodule (8)
- Southern_Gentlem (2)
- nirik (1)
- satellit (1)
Generated by MeetBot 0.1.4.